Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients

A. Tichopád, V. Vítová, Z. Kořístek, D. Lysák,

. 2013 ; 28 (6) : 395-403.

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14074699
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20141008125345.0
007      
ta
008      
141006s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jca.21290 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23922227
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Tichopád, Aleš $u CEEOR-Central and Eastern European Outcomes Research, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Immunology Methods, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients / $c A. Tichopád, V. Vítová, Z. Kořístek, D. Lysák,
520    9_
$a Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a analýza nákladů a výnosů $7 D003362
650    _2
$a cytaferéza $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016238
650    _2
$a rozhodovací stromy $7 D003663
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a faktor stimulující kolonie granulocytů $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D016179
650    _2
$a výdaje na zdravotnictví $7 D005102
650    _2
$a mobilizace hematopoetických kmenových buněk $x ekonomika $x metody $7 D019650
650    _2
$a heterocyklické sloučeniny $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D006571
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a délka pobytu $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D007902
650    _2
$a lymfom $x ekonomika $x chirurgie $7 D008223
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a ekonomické modely $7 D018803
650    _2
$a mnohočetný myelom $x ekonomika $x chirurgie $7 D009101
650    _2
$a transplantace periferních kmenových buněk $x ekonomika $7 D036102
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Československo $7 D003604
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Vítová, Veronika
700    1_
$a Kořístek, Zdeněk
700    1_
$a Lysák, Daniel
773    0_
$w MED00180287 $t Journal of clinical apheresis $x 1098-1101 $g Roč. 28, č. 6 (2013), s. 395-403
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23922227 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20141006 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20141008125733 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1042582 $s 873611
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 28 $c 6 $d 395-403 $i 1098-1101 $m Journal of clinical apheresis $n J Clin Apher $x MED00180287
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20141006

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...