-
Something wrong with this record ?
Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients
A. Tichopád, V. Vítová, Z. Kořístek, D. Lysák,
Language English Country United States
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
23922227
DOI
10.1002/jca.21290
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cost-Benefit Analysis MeSH
- Cytapheresis statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Length of Stay statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Models, Economic MeSH
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor economics therapeutic use MeSH
- Heterocyclic Compounds economics therapeutic use MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymphoma economics surgery MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma economics surgery MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization economics methods MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Decision Trees MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation economics MeSH
- Health Expenditures MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czechoslovakia MeSH
Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.
CEEOR Central and Eastern European Outcomes Research Prague Czech Republic
Department of Immunology Methods Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14074699
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141008125345.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 141006s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jca.21290 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23922227
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Tichopád, Aleš $u CEEOR-Central and Eastern European Outcomes Research, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Immunology Methods, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients / $c A. Tichopád, V. Vítová, Z. Kořístek, D. Lysák,
- 520 9_
- $a Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
- 650 _2
- $a analýza nákladů a výnosů $7 D003362
- 650 _2
- $a cytaferéza $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016238
- 650 _2
- $a rozhodovací stromy $7 D003663
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a faktor stimulující kolonie granulocytů $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D016179
- 650 _2
- $a výdaje na zdravotnictví $7 D005102
- 650 _2
- $a mobilizace hematopoetických kmenových buněk $x ekonomika $x metody $7 D019650
- 650 _2
- $a heterocyklické sloučeniny $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D006571
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a kojenec $7 D007223
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D007902
- 650 _2
- $a lymfom $x ekonomika $x chirurgie $7 D008223
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a ekonomické modely $7 D018803
- 650 _2
- $a mnohočetný myelom $x ekonomika $x chirurgie $7 D009101
- 650 _2
- $a transplantace periferních kmenových buněk $x ekonomika $7 D036102
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 651 _2
- $a Československo $7 D003604
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vítová, Veronika
- 700 1_
- $a Kořístek, Zdeněk
- 700 1_
- $a Lysák, Daniel
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180287 $t Journal of clinical apheresis $x 1098-1101 $g Roč. 28, č. 6 (2013), s. 395-403
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23922227 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20141006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141008125733 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1042582 $s 873611
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 28 $c 6 $d 395-403 $i 1098-1101 $m Journal of clinical apheresis $n J Clin Apher $x MED00180287
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20141006