• Something wrong with this record ?

Multivariate and subgroup analyses of a randomized, multinational, phase 3 trial of decitabine vs treatment choice of supportive care or cytarabine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics

J. Mayer, C. Arthur, J. Delaunay, G. Mazur, XG. Thomas, A. Wierzbowska, F. Ravandi, E. Berrak, M. Jones, Y. Li, HM. Kantarjian,

. 2014 ; 14 (-) : 69.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Compared with younger patients, older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) generally have poorer survival outcomes and less benefit from clinical trials. A recent phase 3 trial demonstrated a trend toward improved overall survival (OS) with decitabine, a hypomethylating agent, compared with treatment choice of either cytarabine or supportive care (7.7 months, 95% CI: 6.2-9.2 vs 5.0 months, 95% CI: 4.3-6.3, respectively) in older adults with newly diagnosed AML. The current analyses investigated prognostic factors for outcomes in this trial and examined OS and responses in prespecified subgroups. METHODS: A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate effects of demographic and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, cytogenetic risk, AML type, ECOG Performance Status, geographic region, bone marrow blasts, platelets, and white blood cells on OS, based on mature data. Similar analyses were conducted with a logistic regression model to predict response rates. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for OS and response rates, also using mature data. RESULTS: Patient characteristics that appeared to negatively influence OS included more advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.560 for ≥75 vs <70 years; p = 0.0010), poorer performance status at baseline (HR 0.771 for 0 or 1 vs 2; p = 0.0321), poor cytogenetics (HR 0.699 for intermediate vs poor; p = 0.0010), higher bone marrow blast counts (HR 1.355 for >50% vs ≤50%; p = 0.0045), low baseline platelet counts (HR 0.775 for each additional 100 × 109/L; p = 0.0015), and high white blood cell counts (HR 1.256 for each additional 25 × 109/L; p = 0.0151). Regarding geographic regions, patients from Western Europe had the longest median OS. Response rates favored decitabine for all subgroups investigated, including patients ≥75 years (odds ratio 5.94, p = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Response to decitabine in AML is associated with known prognostic factors related to both patient demographics and disease characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00260832.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008334
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240516120952.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/1471-2407-14-69 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24498872
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Mayer, Jiří $u Masaryk University Hospital Brno and Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. jmayer@fnbrno.cz.
245    10
$a Multivariate and subgroup analyses of a randomized, multinational, phase 3 trial of decitabine vs treatment choice of supportive care or cytarabine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics / $c J. Mayer, C. Arthur, J. Delaunay, G. Mazur, XG. Thomas, A. Wierzbowska, F. Ravandi, E. Berrak, M. Jones, Y. Li, HM. Kantarjian,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Compared with younger patients, older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) generally have poorer survival outcomes and less benefit from clinical trials. A recent phase 3 trial demonstrated a trend toward improved overall survival (OS) with decitabine, a hypomethylating agent, compared with treatment choice of either cytarabine or supportive care (7.7 months, 95% CI: 6.2-9.2 vs 5.0 months, 95% CI: 4.3-6.3, respectively) in older adults with newly diagnosed AML. The current analyses investigated prognostic factors for outcomes in this trial and examined OS and responses in prespecified subgroups. METHODS: A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate effects of demographic and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, cytogenetic risk, AML type, ECOG Performance Status, geographic region, bone marrow blasts, platelets, and white blood cells on OS, based on mature data. Similar analyses were conducted with a logistic regression model to predict response rates. Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for OS and response rates, also using mature data. RESULTS: Patient characteristics that appeared to negatively influence OS included more advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.560 for ≥75 vs <70 years; p = 0.0010), poorer performance status at baseline (HR 0.771 for 0 or 1 vs 2; p = 0.0321), poor cytogenetics (HR 0.699 for intermediate vs poor; p = 0.0010), higher bone marrow blast counts (HR 1.355 for >50% vs ≤50%; p = 0.0045), low baseline platelet counts (HR 0.775 for each additional 100 × 109/L; p = 0.0015), and high white blood cell counts (HR 1.256 for each additional 25 × 109/L; p = 0.0151). Regarding geographic regions, patients from Western Europe had the longest median OS. Response rates favored decitabine for all subgroups investigated, including patients ≥75 years (odds ratio 5.94, p = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Response to decitabine in AML is associated with known prognostic factors related to both patient demographics and disease characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00260832.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a protinádorové antimetabolity $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000964
650    _2
$a azacytidin $x aplikace a dávkování $x analogy a deriváty $7 D001374
650    _2
$a cytarabin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D003561
650    _2
$a cytogenetické vyšetření $x metody $7 D020732
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a internacionalita $7 D038622
650    _2
$a akutní myeloidní leukemie $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $7 D015470
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Arthur, Christopher $7 gn_A_00009020
700    1_
$a Delaunay, Jacques
700    1_
$a Mazur, Grzegorz
700    1_
$a Thomas, Xavier $7 xx0317364
700    1_
$a Wierzbowska, Agnieszka
700    1_
$a Ravandi, Farhad
700    1_
$a Berrak, Erhan
700    1_
$a Jones, Mark
700    1_
$a Li, Yuhan
700    1_
$a Kantarjian, Hagop M
773    0_
$w MED00008171 $t BMC cancer $x 1471-2407 $g Roč. 14 (2014), s. 69
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24498872 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240516120946 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065607 $s 891134
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 14 $c - $d 69 $i 1471-2407 $m BMC cancer $n BMC Cancer $x MED00008171
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...