-
Something wrong with this record ?
Abdominal wall reconstruction using a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold: a follow-up study
JR. Diaz-Siso, EM. Bueno, B. Pomahac,
Language English Country France
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1999-06-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2003-03-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1999-06-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Abdominoplasty adverse effects methods MeSH
- Bioprosthesis * MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Surgical Wound Infection etiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Herniorrhaphy adverse effects MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Seroma etiology MeSH
- Tissue Scaffolds * MeSH
- Hernia, Ventral surgery MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: In a previous study, we have shown that non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffolds (NCPDS) are a safe and effective alternative to prosthetic mesh in the reconstruction of complicated abdominal wall defects. Here, we report the long-term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction using NCPDS in a larger patient population. METHODS: Patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with NCPDS between May 2006 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Analysis of demographics, indications for NCPDS placement, surgical technique, complications, and follow-up data was performed. RESULTS: NCPDS was used for abdominal wall repair in 40 patients. In all patients, NCPDS was positioned using an intraperitoneal technique. At a mean follow-up time of 40.1 months, most patients had successful outcomes. Complications included seroma (21 %), recurrence (7.9 %), and infection (5.2 %); these rates are comparable to our initial report. Two patients died from multi-organ failure unrelated to NCPDS placement. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that complex abdominal wall defects can be successfully reconstructed using NCPDS with a low rate of recurrence and complications.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15012601
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151022102208.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150409s2013 fr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10029-012-0927-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22707311
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a fr
- 100 1_
- $a Diaz-Siso, J R $u Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. bpomahac@partners.org
- 245 10
- $a Abdominal wall reconstruction using a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold: a follow-up study / $c JR. Diaz-Siso, EM. Bueno, B. Pomahac,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: In a previous study, we have shown that non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffolds (NCPDS) are a safe and effective alternative to prosthetic mesh in the reconstruction of complicated abdominal wall defects. Here, we report the long-term outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction using NCPDS in a larger patient population. METHODS: Patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with NCPDS between May 2006 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Analysis of demographics, indications for NCPDS placement, surgical technique, complications, and follow-up data was performed. RESULTS: NCPDS was used for abdominal wall repair in 40 patients. In all patients, NCPDS was positioned using an intraperitoneal technique. At a mean follow-up time of 40.1 months, most patients had successful outcomes. Complications included seroma (21 %), recurrence (7.9 %), and infection (5.2 %); these rates are comparable to our initial report. Two patients died from multi-organ failure unrelated to NCPDS placement. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that complex abdominal wall defects can be successfully reconstructed using NCPDS with a low rate of recurrence and complications.
- 650 _2
- $a abdominoplastika $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D061645
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a bioprotézy $7 D001705
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a ventrální hernie $x chirurgie $7 D006555
- 650 _2
- $a operace kýly $x škodlivé účinky $7 D059685
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a serom $x etiologie $7 D049291
- 650 _2
- $a infekce chirurgické rány $x etiologie $7 D013530
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 12
- $a tkáňové podpůrné struktury $7 D054457
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bueno, E M
- 700 1_
- $a Pomahač, Bohdan, $d 1971- $7 xx0117402
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005723 $t Hernia the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery $x 1248-9204 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2013), s. 37-44
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22707311 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150409 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151022102403 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1070772 $s 895460
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 17 $c 1 $d 37-44 $i 1248-9204 $m Hernia $n Hernia $x MED00005723
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150409