-
Something wrong with this record ?
Imaging techniques for the evaluation of ovarian cancer
D. Fischerova, A. Burgetova,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
Grant support
NT13070
MZ0
CEP Register
- MeSH
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant MeSH
- CA-125 Antigen analysis MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymphatic Metastasis MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Membrane Proteins analysis MeSH
- Multidetector Computed Tomography MeSH
- Ovarian Neoplasms diagnosis drug therapy pathology surgery ultrasonography MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed MeSH
- Positron-Emission Tomography MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Women with ovarian cancer often present at advanced stage of disease. The outcome depends mainly on the stage of disease at first diagnosis, but also on the quality of treatment. For individualised tumour treatment, detailed assessment of tumour extension using modern imaging is crucial. Ultrasound remains the initial and most important imaging method for ovarian cancer detection. Although increasing evidence shows that ultrasound is an accurate technique to stage and follow up ovarian cancer, it requires an experienced examiner capable of examining both the pelvis and the abdomen. Computed tomography is the most commonly used imaging modality for preoperative staging and follow up. Magnetic resonance imaging remains a second-line imaging method for solving problems, mainly in the pelvis. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography is the optimal imaging technique for suspected recurrence, particularly in women with rising CA 125 levels, but negative results of conventional imaging methods.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15014297
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181109142956.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150420s2014 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.006 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24846098
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Fischerová, Daniela $u Gynecological Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Apolinarska 18, 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: daniela.fischerova@seznam.cz. $7 xx0074804
- 245 10
- $a Imaging techniques for the evaluation of ovarian cancer / $c D. Fischerova, A. Burgetova,
- 520 9_
- $a Women with ovarian cancer often present at advanced stage of disease. The outcome depends mainly on the stage of disease at first diagnosis, but also on the quality of treatment. For individualised tumour treatment, detailed assessment of tumour extension using modern imaging is crucial. Ultrasound remains the initial and most important imaging method for ovarian cancer detection. Although increasing evidence shows that ultrasound is an accurate technique to stage and follow up ovarian cancer, it requires an experienced examiner capable of examining both the pelvis and the abdomen. Computed tomography is the most commonly used imaging modality for preoperative staging and follow up. Magnetic resonance imaging remains a second-line imaging method for solving problems, mainly in the pelvis. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography is the optimal imaging technique for suspected recurrence, particularly in women with rising CA 125 levels, but negative results of conventional imaging methods.
- 650 _2
- $a antigen CA-125 $x analýza $7 D018394
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvantní chemoterapie $7 D017024
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a membránové proteiny $x analýza $7 D008565
- 650 _2
- $a multidetektorová počítačová tomografie $7 D061330
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a nádory vaječníků $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $x chirurgie $x ultrasonografie $7 D010051
- 650 _2
- $a pozitronová emisní tomografie $7 D049268
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Burgetová, Andrea $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0163957
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007099 $t Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology $x 1532-1932 $g Roč. 28, č. 5 (2014), s. 697-720
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24846098 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150420 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181109143036 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1071878 $s 897175
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 28 $c 5 $d 697-720 $i 1532-1932 $m Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology $n Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol $x MED00007099 $o Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology
- GRA __
- $a NT13070 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150420