Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Factors affecting sonographic preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer

D. Fischerova, F. Frühauf, M. Zikan, I. Pinkavova, R. Kocián, P. Dundr, K. Nemejcova, L. Dusek, D. Cibula,

. 2014 ; 43 (5) : 575-585.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NT13070 MZ0 CEP Register

OBJECTIVES: To identify major factors in the under- and overestimation of cervical and myometrial invasion by endometrial cancer at preoperative staging by ultrasound. METHODS: This prospective study involved all patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer referred consecutively for surgical staging between January 2009 and December 2011. All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination, obtaining metric and perfusion data, and the results were compared with final histology: myometrial invasion was defined at histology in the final pathology report as being either < or ≥ 50%, while cervical stromal invasion was reported as being either present or absent, and sonographic over-/underestimation was determined relative to these. RESULTS: Enrolled prospectively into the study were 210 patients. The proportion of cases with sonographic underestimation, relative to final histology, of myometrial invasion (i.e. false-negative estimation of no or superficial invasion < 50%) and of cervical invasion (i.e. false-negative finding of absence of stromal invasion) was comparable: 8.6% (n = 18) and 10.5% (n = 22), respectively. Myometrial invasion was overestimated by ultrasound (i.e. false-positive estimation of deep invasion ≥ 50%) in 15.7% (n = 33) of cases, and cervical invasion was overestimated (i.e. false-positive finding of presence of stromal invasion) in 4.8% (n = 10) of cases. These outcomes correspond to positive and negative predictive values of 67.6% (95% CI, 57.7-76.6) and 83.3% (95% CI, 74.9-89.8), respectively, for the subjective assessment of myometrial invasion, and 60.0% (95% CI, 38.2-79.2) and 88.1% (95% CI, 82.5-92.4), respectively, for that of cervical stromal invasion. The staging error in subjective assessment was not related to body mass index (BMI), to the position of the uterus in the pelvis or to image quality. Cervical and myometrial invasion were more often underestimated in well-differentiated endometrial cancers that were smaller in size, with thick minimum tumor-free myometrium and lower perfusion, and more often overestimated in moderately and poorly differentiated cancers that were larger in size, with thin minimum tumor-free myometrium and richer perfusion. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of subjective assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion by ultrasound was significantly influenced by tumor size, density of tumor vascularization, tumor vessel architecture and histological grading, while it was not significantly affected by BMI, uterine position and image quality.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15014571
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181109140353.0
007      
ta
008      
150420s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/uog.13248 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24281994
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Fischerová, Daniela $u Gynecological Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0074804
245    10
$a Factors affecting sonographic preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer / $c D. Fischerova, F. Frühauf, M. Zikan, I. Pinkavova, R. Kocián, P. Dundr, K. Nemejcova, L. Dusek, D. Cibula,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: To identify major factors in the under- and overestimation of cervical and myometrial invasion by endometrial cancer at preoperative staging by ultrasound. METHODS: This prospective study involved all patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer referred consecutively for surgical staging between January 2009 and December 2011. All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination, obtaining metric and perfusion data, and the results were compared with final histology: myometrial invasion was defined at histology in the final pathology report as being either < or ≥ 50%, while cervical stromal invasion was reported as being either present or absent, and sonographic over-/underestimation was determined relative to these. RESULTS: Enrolled prospectively into the study were 210 patients. The proportion of cases with sonographic underestimation, relative to final histology, of myometrial invasion (i.e. false-negative estimation of no or superficial invasion < 50%) and of cervical invasion (i.e. false-negative finding of absence of stromal invasion) was comparable: 8.6% (n = 18) and 10.5% (n = 22), respectively. Myometrial invasion was overestimated by ultrasound (i.e. false-positive estimation of deep invasion ≥ 50%) in 15.7% (n = 33) of cases, and cervical invasion was overestimated (i.e. false-positive finding of presence of stromal invasion) in 4.8% (n = 10) of cases. These outcomes correspond to positive and negative predictive values of 67.6% (95% CI, 57.7-76.6) and 83.3% (95% CI, 74.9-89.8), respectively, for the subjective assessment of myometrial invasion, and 60.0% (95% CI, 38.2-79.2) and 88.1% (95% CI, 82.5-92.4), respectively, for that of cervical stromal invasion. The staging error in subjective assessment was not related to body mass index (BMI), to the position of the uterus in the pelvis or to image quality. Cervical and myometrial invasion were more often underestimated in well-differentiated endometrial cancers that were smaller in size, with thick minimum tumor-free myometrium and lower perfusion, and more often overestimated in moderately and poorly differentiated cancers that were larger in size, with thin minimum tumor-free myometrium and richer perfusion. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of subjective assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion by ultrasound was significantly influenced by tumor size, density of tumor vascularization, tumor vessel architecture and histological grading, while it was not significantly affected by BMI, uterine position and image quality.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
650    _2
$a pohyb buněk $7 D002465
650    _2
$a cervix uteri $x patologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D002584
650    _2
$a nádory endometria $x patologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D016889
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a myometrium $x patologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D009215
650    _2
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a předoperační péče $x metody $7 D011300
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Frühauf, Filip $7 xx0207709
700    1_
$a Zikán, Michal, $d 1976- $7 xx0096708
700    1_
$a Pinkavová, Ivana, $d 1976- $7 xx0103207
700    1_
$a Kocián, Roman $7 xx0239055
700    1_
$a Dundr, Pavel, $d 1971- $7 xx0080436
700    1_
$a Nemejcova, K
700    1_
$a Dušek, Ladislav, $d 1967- $7 mzk2003181727
700    1_
$a Cibula, David, $d 1968- $7 jo20000074072
773    0_
$w MED00010717 $t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology $x 1469-0705 $g Roč. 43, č. 5 (2014), s. 575-585
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24281994 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181109140433 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1072152 $s 897449
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 43 $c 5 $d 575-585 $i 1469-0705 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $n Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x MED00010717
GRA    __
$a NT13070 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...