-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Quality attributes and composition of meat from red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and Aberdeen Angus and Holstein cattle (Bos taurus)
D. Bureš, L. Bartoň, R. Kotrba, J. Hakl,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25298298
DOI
10.1002/jsfa.6950
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- ateroskleróza MeSH
- barva MeSH
- chuť * MeSH
- kolagen analýza MeSH
- kyseliny mastné omega-3 analýza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- maso analýza normy MeSH
- mechanický stres MeSH
- nutriční hodnota * MeSH
- odoranty * MeSH
- skot MeSH
- tuky analýza MeSH
- vysoká zvěř * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- skot MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The consumption of venison from deer species has increased in recent years owing to presumably positive health effects. Therefore a comparison was made of the physical characteristics, chemical composition and sensory attributes of meat obtained from red deer, fallow deer and Aberdeen Angus and Holstein cattle raised under conditions typical for commercial farming practice and slaughtered at similar ages. RESULTS: Venison had one-quarter the crude fat content, lower total collagen and a higher proportion of heat-soluble collagen. It was darker and less yellow than beef. Deer species provided meat with higher polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acid ratio and lower atherogenic index. In addition, the venison of red deer contained five times as much n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as the beef. Steaks prepared from venison were scored higher than beef for flavour and aroma intensity; they were also tenderer and more easily chewable. CONCLUSION: Compared with beef, venison from two widely farmed deer species was superior in nutrient composition, thus offering potential benefits for human consumption, and it received higher scores for most of the sensory attributes examined.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16021046
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160801111521.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jsfa.6950 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jsfa.6950 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25298298
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Bureš, Daniel $u Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves 104 00, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Quality attributes and composition of meat from red deer (Cervus elaphus), fallow deer (Dama dama) and Aberdeen Angus and Holstein cattle (Bos taurus) / $c D. Bureš, L. Bartoň, R. Kotrba, J. Hakl,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The consumption of venison from deer species has increased in recent years owing to presumably positive health effects. Therefore a comparison was made of the physical characteristics, chemical composition and sensory attributes of meat obtained from red deer, fallow deer and Aberdeen Angus and Holstein cattle raised under conditions typical for commercial farming practice and slaughtered at similar ages. RESULTS: Venison had one-quarter the crude fat content, lower total collagen and a higher proportion of heat-soluble collagen. It was darker and less yellow than beef. Deer species provided meat with higher polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acid ratio and lower atherogenic index. In addition, the venison of red deer contained five times as much n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as the beef. Steaks prepared from venison were scored higher than beef for flavour and aroma intensity; they were also tenderer and more easily chewable. CONCLUSION: Compared with beef, venison from two widely farmed deer species was superior in nutrient composition, thus offering potential benefits for human consumption, and it received higher scores for most of the sensory attributes examined.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a ateroskleróza $7 D050197
- 650 _2
- $a skot $7 D002417
- 650 _2
- $a kolagen $x analýza $7 D003094
- 650 _2
- $a barva $7 D003116
- 650 12
- $a vysoká zvěř $7 D003670
- 650 _2
- $a tuky $x analýza $7 D005223
- 650 _2
- $a kyseliny mastné omega-3 $x analýza $7 D015525
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a maso $x analýza $x normy $7 D008460
- 650 12
- $a nutriční hodnota $7 D009753
- 650 12
- $a odoranty $7 D009812
- 650 _2
- $a mechanický stres $7 D013314
- 650 12
- $a chuť $7 D013649
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Bartoň, Luděk $u Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves 104 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kotrba, Radim $u Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves 104 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hakl, Josef $u Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, 165 21, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003015 $t Journal of the science of food and agriculture $x 1097-0010 $g Roč. 95, č. 11 (2015), s. 2299-306
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25298298 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160801111748 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155716 $s 945574
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 95 $c 11 $d 2299-306 $e 20141110 $i 1097-0010 $m Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture $n J Sci Food Agric $x MED00003015
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722