-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity
A. Gába, O. Kapuš, R. Cuberek, M. Botek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25039938
DOI
10.1111/jhn.12257
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- absorpční fotometrie * MeSH
- akcelerometrie MeSH
- cvičení fyziologie MeSH
- elektrická impedance * MeSH
- index tělesné hmotnosti * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obezita patofyziologie MeSH
- postmenopauza fyziologie MeSH
- sedavý životní styl MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- složení těla * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) is commonly used in research to assess body composition. However, studies that validate the accuracy of BIA exclusively in post-menopausal women are lacking. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement of multi-frequency (MF)-BIA and single-frequency (SF)-BIA with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the estimation of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) among post-menopausal women with variation in body mass index (BMI) and physical activity (PA). METHODS: FM and FFM were estimated by BIA and DXA in 146 post-menopausal women with a mean (SD) age of 62.8 (5.2) years. PA was determined by an accelerometer. RESULTS: The mean (SD) difference between MF-BIA and DXA was -1.8 (1.8) kg (P = 0.08) and 1.3 (1.8) kg (P = 0.01) for FM and FFM, respectively. SF-BIA provided a significantly lower estimate of FM [-2.0 (2.2) kg; P = 0.04] and a higher estimate of FFM [1.8 (2.4) kg; P < 0.01] compared to DXA. MF-BIA provided significantly better estimates of FM and FFM with narrower limits of agreement than SF-BIA in obese and insufficiently active subjects. In other BMI and PA groups, both BIA devices showed a similar deviation from DXA. CONCLUSIONS: BIA tends to underestimate FM and overestimate FFM relative to DXA. MF-BIA appears to be a more appropriate method for the assessment of body composition than SF-BIA in post-menopausal woman with BMI >30 kg/m(2) and in those who are insufficiently active.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16021081
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160801102050.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jhn.12257 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jhn.12257 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25039938
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Gába, A $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity / $c A. Gába, O. Kapuš, R. Cuberek, M. Botek,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) is commonly used in research to assess body composition. However, studies that validate the accuracy of BIA exclusively in post-menopausal women are lacking. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement of multi-frequency (MF)-BIA and single-frequency (SF)-BIA with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the estimation of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) among post-menopausal women with variation in body mass index (BMI) and physical activity (PA). METHODS: FM and FFM were estimated by BIA and DXA in 146 post-menopausal women with a mean (SD) age of 62.8 (5.2) years. PA was determined by an accelerometer. RESULTS: The mean (SD) difference between MF-BIA and DXA was -1.8 (1.8) kg (P = 0.08) and 1.3 (1.8) kg (P = 0.01) for FM and FFM, respectively. SF-BIA provided a significantly lower estimate of FM [-2.0 (2.2) kg; P = 0.04] and a higher estimate of FFM [1.8 (2.4) kg; P < 0.01] compared to DXA. MF-BIA provided significantly better estimates of FM and FFM with narrower limits of agreement than SF-BIA in obese and insufficiently active subjects. In other BMI and PA groups, both BIA devices showed a similar deviation from DXA. CONCLUSIONS: BIA tends to underestimate FM and overestimate FFM relative to DXA. MF-BIA appears to be a more appropriate method for the assessment of body composition than SF-BIA in post-menopausal woman with BMI >30 kg/m(2) and in those who are insufficiently active.
- 650 12
- $a absorpční fotometrie $7 D015502
- 650 _2
- $a akcelerometrie $7 D061725
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a složení těla $7 D001823
- 650 12
- $a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
- 650 12
- $a elektrická impedance $7 D017097
- 650 _2
- $a cvičení $x fyziologie $7 D015444
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a obezita $x patofyziologie $7 D009765
- 650 _2
- $a postmenopauza $x fyziologie $7 D017698
- 650 _2
- $a sedavý životní styl $7 D057185
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kapuš, O $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cuberek, R $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Botek, M $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007285 $t Journal of human nutrition and dietetics the official journal of the British Dietetic Association $x 1365-277X $g Roč. 28, č. 4 (2015), s. 390-400
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25039938 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160801102317 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155751 $s 945609
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 28 $c 4 $d 390-400 $e 20140707 $i 1365-277X $m Journal of human nutrition and dietetics $n J Hum Nutr Diet $x MED00007285
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722