• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity

A. Gába, O. Kapuš, R. Cuberek, M. Botek,

. 2015 ; 28 (4) : 390-400. [pub] 20140707

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16021081

BACKGROUND: Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) is commonly used in research to assess body composition. However, studies that validate the accuracy of BIA exclusively in post-menopausal women are lacking. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement of multi-frequency (MF)-BIA and single-frequency (SF)-BIA with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the estimation of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) among post-menopausal women with variation in body mass index (BMI) and physical activity (PA). METHODS: FM and FFM were estimated by BIA and DXA in 146 post-menopausal women with a mean (SD) age of 62.8 (5.2) years. PA was determined by an accelerometer. RESULTS: The mean (SD) difference between MF-BIA and DXA was -1.8 (1.8) kg (P = 0.08) and 1.3 (1.8) kg (P = 0.01) for FM and FFM, respectively. SF-BIA provided a significantly lower estimate of FM [-2.0 (2.2) kg; P = 0.04] and a higher estimate of FFM [1.8 (2.4) kg; P < 0.01] compared to DXA. MF-BIA provided significantly better estimates of FM and FFM with narrower limits of agreement than SF-BIA in obese and insufficiently active subjects. In other BMI and PA groups, both BIA devices showed a similar deviation from DXA. CONCLUSIONS: BIA tends to underestimate FM and overestimate FFM relative to DXA. MF-BIA appears to be a more appropriate method for the assessment of body composition than SF-BIA in post-menopausal woman with BMI >30 kg/m(2) and in those who are insufficiently active.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16021081
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160801102050.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jhn.12257 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jhn.12257 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25039938
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Gába, A $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity / $c A. Gába, O. Kapuš, R. Cuberek, M. Botek,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) is commonly used in research to assess body composition. However, studies that validate the accuracy of BIA exclusively in post-menopausal women are lacking. The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate the agreement of multi-frequency (MF)-BIA and single-frequency (SF)-BIA with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the estimation of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) among post-menopausal women with variation in body mass index (BMI) and physical activity (PA). METHODS: FM and FFM were estimated by BIA and DXA in 146 post-menopausal women with a mean (SD) age of 62.8 (5.2) years. PA was determined by an accelerometer. RESULTS: The mean (SD) difference between MF-BIA and DXA was -1.8 (1.8) kg (P = 0.08) and 1.3 (1.8) kg (P = 0.01) for FM and FFM, respectively. SF-BIA provided a significantly lower estimate of FM [-2.0 (2.2) kg; P = 0.04] and a higher estimate of FFM [1.8 (2.4) kg; P < 0.01] compared to DXA. MF-BIA provided significantly better estimates of FM and FFM with narrower limits of agreement than SF-BIA in obese and insufficiently active subjects. In other BMI and PA groups, both BIA devices showed a similar deviation from DXA. CONCLUSIONS: BIA tends to underestimate FM and overestimate FFM relative to DXA. MF-BIA appears to be a more appropriate method for the assessment of body composition than SF-BIA in post-menopausal woman with BMI >30 kg/m(2) and in those who are insufficiently active.
650    12
$a absorpční fotometrie $7 D015502
650    _2
$a akcelerometrie $7 D061725
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a složení těla $7 D001823
650    12
$a index tělesné hmotnosti $7 D015992
650    12
$a elektrická impedance $7 D017097
650    _2
$a cvičení $x fyziologie $7 D015444
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a obezita $x patofyziologie $7 D009765
650    _2
$a postmenopauza $x fyziologie $7 D017698
650    _2
$a sedavý životní styl $7 D057185
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kapuš, O $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cuberek, R $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Botek, M $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00007285 $t Journal of human nutrition and dietetics the official journal of the British Dietetic Association $x 1365-277X $g Roč. 28, č. 4 (2015), s. 390-400
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25039938 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160801102317 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1155751 $s 945609
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 28 $c 4 $d 390-400 $e 20140707 $i 1365-277X $m Journal of human nutrition and dietetics $n J Hum Nutr Diet $x MED00007285
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...