-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Phosphorus Removal in Low-Flux Hemodialysis, High-Flux Hemodialysis, and Hemodiafiltration
F. Švára, F. Lopot, I. Valkovský, O. Pecha,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- dialýza ledvin metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fosfor krev MeSH
- hemodiafiltrace metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Phosphorus removal by hemoelimination procedure is a important mechanism to maintain phosphorus level in acceptable level in patients on dialysis. Phosphorus is removed by both diffusion and convection, but in clinical practice, it is not possible to differentiate the contribution of this two transport modalities. We used Gutzwiller formula to quantify the amount of removed phosphorus and compared it in low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD), high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), and on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF). There were no significant differences in phosphorus predialysis concentration, duration of procedure, processed blood volume and ultrafiltration, e.g., factors, which could possibly influence phosphorus elimination. All three tested dialysis modes also did not differ in urea dialysis dose (Kt/V) as a parameter of small molecular weight removal (LFHD, 1.50 ± 0.04 vs HFHD, 1.5 ± 0.06 vs HDF, 1.5 ± 0.05). The amount of removed phosphorus in LFHD, HFHD, and HDF was 34.0 ± 1.2, 37.8 ± 1.6, and 38.3 ± 1.4 mmol, respectively. Statistically significant increase in phosphorus removal was seen only with use of high-flux membrane (HFHD and HDF) when compared with the low-flux one. No difference was, however, found between HFHD and HDF. It can thus be concluded that phosphorus removal in all three dialysis modes is a predominantly diffusive issue and contribution of convection to it is minor to negligible.
‡Clinic of Internal Medicine University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic
From the *Department of Medicine Strahov General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17000867
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170113104415.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000313 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000313 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26579979
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Švára, František $u From the *Department of Medicine Strahov, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; †Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; ‡Clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Phosphorus Removal in Low-Flux Hemodialysis, High-Flux Hemodialysis, and Hemodiafiltration / $c F. Švára, F. Lopot, I. Valkovský, O. Pecha,
- 520 9_
- $a Phosphorus removal by hemoelimination procedure is a important mechanism to maintain phosphorus level in acceptable level in patients on dialysis. Phosphorus is removed by both diffusion and convection, but in clinical practice, it is not possible to differentiate the contribution of this two transport modalities. We used Gutzwiller formula to quantify the amount of removed phosphorus and compared it in low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD), high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), and on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF). There were no significant differences in phosphorus predialysis concentration, duration of procedure, processed blood volume and ultrafiltration, e.g., factors, which could possibly influence phosphorus elimination. All three tested dialysis modes also did not differ in urea dialysis dose (Kt/V) as a parameter of small molecular weight removal (LFHD, 1.50 ± 0.04 vs HFHD, 1.5 ± 0.06 vs HDF, 1.5 ± 0.05). The amount of removed phosphorus in LFHD, HFHD, and HDF was 34.0 ± 1.2, 37.8 ± 1.6, and 38.3 ± 1.4 mmol, respectively. Statistically significant increase in phosphorus removal was seen only with use of high-flux membrane (HFHD and HDF) when compared with the low-flux one. No difference was, however, found between HFHD and HDF. It can thus be concluded that phosphorus removal in all three dialysis modes is a predominantly diffusive issue and contribution of convection to it is minor to negligible.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a hemodiafiltrace $x metody $7 D017583
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a fosfor $x krev $7 D010758
- 650 _2
- $a dialýza ledvin $x metody $7 D006435
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lopot, František
- 700 1_
- $a Valkovský, Ivo
- 700 1_
- $a Pecha, Ondřej
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000604 $t ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs 1992) $x 1538-943X $g Roč. 62, č. 2 (2016), s. 176-81
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579979 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170113104515 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1180007 $s 961434
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 62 $c 2 $d 176-81 $i 1538-943X $m ASAIO journal $n Asaio J $x MED00000604
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103