-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Impact of retransfusion of blood processed in cell-saver on coagulation versus cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective observational study using thromboelastography
T. Vymazal, M. Filaun, M. Horacek
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, pozorovací studie
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
- MeSH
- hemokoagulace fyziologie MeSH
- kardiopulmonální bypass * MeSH
- krevní transfuze metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- opakovaná terapie MeSH
- pooperační krvácení krev diagnóza terapie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- tromboelastografie metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
AIMS: To compare an impact of retransfusion of blood processed in cell-saver (CS) with that of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on blood coagulation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Prospective observational study using thromboelastography (TEG). RESULTS: TEG samples from 170 patients were analyzed. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 100 patients while 70 patients were operated off-pump. In 20 off-pump patients collected blood was processed by cell-saver and returned. In all patients clot formation after heparin neutralization by protamine was unimpaired. However, there was a significant increase in fibrinolysis defined by the TEG parameter Lysis time 30 min after the maximum amplitude of the clot was reached (Ly30) in groups with CPB or CS but this increase still did not exceed the threshold for clinical fibrinolysis (Ly30 > 7.5%). In the group without CPB there was no significant impact on coagulation. CONCLUSION: Surgery that avoids CPB and/or CS is the gentlest method for inducing blood coagulation.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17006048
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170308085057.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170210s2015 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2013.012 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23549515
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Vymazal, Tomáš $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 2nd Medical School, Charles University in Prague and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0192065
- 245 10
- $a Impact of retransfusion of blood processed in cell-saver on coagulation versus cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective observational study using thromboelastography / $c T. Vymazal, M. Filaun, M. Horacek
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: To compare an impact of retransfusion of blood processed in cell-saver (CS) with that of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on blood coagulation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Prospective observational study using thromboelastography (TEG). RESULTS: TEG samples from 170 patients were analyzed. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in 100 patients while 70 patients were operated off-pump. In 20 off-pump patients collected blood was processed by cell-saver and returned. In all patients clot formation after heparin neutralization by protamine was unimpaired. However, there was a significant increase in fibrinolysis defined by the TEG parameter Lysis time 30 min after the maximum amplitude of the clot was reached (Ly30) in groups with CPB or CS but this increase still did not exceed the threshold for clinical fibrinolysis (Ly30 > 7.5%). In the group without CPB there was no significant impact on coagulation. CONCLUSION: Surgery that avoids CPB and/or CS is the gentlest method for inducing blood coagulation.
- 650 _2
- $a hemokoagulace $x fyziologie $7 D001777
- 650 _2
- $a krevní transfuze $x metody $7 D001803
- 650 12
- $a kardiopulmonální bypass $7 D002315
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační krvácení $x krev $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D019106
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a opakovaná terapie $7 D019233
- 650 _2
- $a tromboelastografie $x metody $7 D013916
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Filaun, Martin $7 xx0074435 $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 2nd Medical School, Charles University in Prague and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Horáček, Michal $7 xx0076506 $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 2nd Medical School, Charles University in Prague and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 159, č. 1 (2015), s. 131-134
- 856 41
- $u http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170210 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170223105359 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1192578 $s 966695
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 159 $c 1 $d 131-134 $e 20130322 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170210
