Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

IDH1/2 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation - the relevant survival predictors in Czech patients with brain gliomas

F. Kramář, M. Minárik, L. Benešová, T. Halková, D. Netuka, O. Bradáč, V. Beneš

. 2016 ; 62 (5) : 194-202.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
NT14253 MZ0 CEP Register

Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of tumours varying in prognosis, treatment approach, and overall survival. Recently, novel markers have been identified which are linked to patient prognosis and therapeutic response. Especially the mutation of the enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) gene and the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status seem to be the most important predictors of survival. From 2012 to 2015, 94 Czech patients with primary brain tumours were enrolled into the study. The IDH1/2 mutation was detected by denaturing capillary electrophores.The methylation status of the MGMT gene and other 46 genes was revealed by MS-MLPA. In all 94 patients, the clinical data were correlated with molecular markers by Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression model. The MGMT promoter methylation status was established and compared to clinical data. In our study eight different probes were used to elucidate the MGMT methylation status; hypermethylation was proclaimed if four and more probes were positive. This 3 : 5 ratio was tested and confirmed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. The study confirmed the importance of the IDH1/2 mutation and hypermethylation of the MGMT gene promoter being present in tumour tissue. Both markers are independent positive survival predictors; in the Cox model the IDH hazard ratio was 0.10 and in the case of MGMT methylation it reached 0.32. The methylation analysis of the panel of additional 46 genes did not reveal any other significant epigenetic markers; none of the candidate genes have been confirmed in the Cox regression analyses as an independent prognostic factor.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17010407
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190703150803.0
007      
ta
008      
170320s2016 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)27978414
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kramář, Filip $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0061774
245    10
$a IDH1/2 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation - the relevant survival predictors in Czech patients with brain gliomas / $c F. Kramář, M. Minárik, L. Benešová, T. Halková, D. Netuka, O. Bradáč, V. Beneš
520    9_
$a Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of tumours varying in prognosis, treatment approach, and overall survival. Recently, novel markers have been identified which are linked to patient prognosis and therapeutic response. Especially the mutation of the enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) gene and the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status seem to be the most important predictors of survival. From 2012 to 2015, 94 Czech patients with primary brain tumours were enrolled into the study. The IDH1/2 mutation was detected by denaturing capillary electrophores.The methylation status of the MGMT gene and other 46 genes was revealed by MS-MLPA. In all 94 patients, the clinical data were correlated with molecular markers by Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression model. The MGMT promoter methylation status was established and compared to clinical data. In our study eight different probes were used to elucidate the MGMT methylation status; hypermethylation was proclaimed if four and more probes were positive. This 3 : 5 ratio was tested and confirmed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. The study confirmed the importance of the IDH1/2 mutation and hypermethylation of the MGMT gene promoter being present in tumour tissue. Both markers are independent positive survival predictors; in the Cox model the IDH hazard ratio was 0.10 and in the case of MGMT methylation it reached 0.32. The methylation analysis of the panel of additional 46 genes did not reveal any other significant epigenetic markers; none of the candidate genes have been confirmed in the Cox regression analyses as an independent prognostic factor.
650    _2
$a nádory mozku $x enzymologie $x genetika $7 D001932
650    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
650    _2
$a metylace DNA $x genetika $7 D019175
650    _2
$a DNA modifikační methylasy $x genetika $7 D015254
650    _2
$a enzymy opravy DNA $x genetika $7 D045643
650    _2
$a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
650    _2
$a epigeneze genetická $7 D044127
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a gliom $x enzymologie $x genetika $7 D005910
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a isocitrátdehydrogenasa $x genetika $7 D007521
650    _2
$a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mutace $x genetika $7 D009154
650    12
$a promotorové oblasti (genetika) $7 D011401
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a regresní analýza $7 D012044
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a nádorové supresorové proteiny $x genetika $7 D025521
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Minárik, Marek, $u Center for Applied Genomics of Solid Tumors (CEGES), Genomac Research Institute, Ltd, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1970- $7 xx0071043
700    1_
$a Mináriková, Lucie. $u Center for Applied Genomics of Solid Tumors (CEGES), Genomac Research Institute, Ltd, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0105258
700    1_
$a Halková, T. $u Center for Applied Genomics of Solid Tumors (CEGES), Genomac Research Institute, Ltd, Prague, Czech Republic $7 _AN090905
700    1_
$a Netuka, David $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0061783
700    1_
$a Bradáč, Ondřej $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0121581
700    1_
$a Beneš, Vladimír, $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic $d 1953- $7 jn20000400135
773    0_
$w MED00011004 $t Folia biologica $x 0015-5500 $g Roč. 62, č. 5 (2016), s. 194-202
856    41
$u http://fb.cuni.cz/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 970 $c 89 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20170320 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190703150954 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1196586 $s 971123
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 62 $c 5 $d 194-202 $i 0015-5500 $m Folia biologica (Praha) $n Folia biol. (Praha) $x MED00011004
GRA    __
$a NT14253 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170320

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...