Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Tests of manual dexterity and speed in Parkinson's disease: Not all measure the same

E. Růžička, R. Krupička, K. Zárubová, J. Rusz, R. Jech, Z. Szabó,

. 2016 ; 28 (-) : 118-123. [pub] 20160507

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011215

Grantová podpora
NT14181 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

INTRODUCTION: Timed performance tests were introduced to overcome the disadvantages of subjective evaluation of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to verify their discriminative properties and compare them with the motion capture analysis of finger tapping. METHODS: We included 22 PD patients (10 M, 12 F), mean age 64 (range 48-82) yrs, Hoehn & Yahr stage 2 (1-2.5) and 22 (10 M, 12 F) normal controls, mean age 66 (41-82) yrs. The key tapping subtest of the Halstead-Reitan battery, the Purdue Pegboard test, and the Bradykinesia-Akinesia Incoordination (BRAIN) test were performed according to the test manuals. The finger tapping subtest of the UPDRS-III, item 23 was recorded using a contactless 3D motion capture system Optitrack-V120. Average frequency (AvgFrq), maximum opening velocity (MaxOpV) and amplitude decrement (AmpDec) were computed and simultaneous video recordings of finger tapping were rated by two experts. RESULTS: The AmpDec and MaxOpV motion capture measures best differentiated between PD patients and controls (AUC = 0.87 and 0.81). Of the instrumental tests, only the Purdue Pegboard attained significance in differentiating PD patients from controls (AUC = 0.80). In PD patients, MaxOpV correlated with the finger tapping ratings and BRAIN test, and AvgFrq correlated with the BRAIN and Halstead-Reitan test scores. Moreover, correlations were found between the Purdue Pegboard and finger tapping ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Contactless 3D motion capture of finger tapping allowed an independent analysis of individual components of bradykinesia, demonstrating the amplitude decrement and maximum opening velocity as the most powerful discriminators between PD patients and controls.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011215
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181015092407.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.05.009 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27185294
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Růžička, Evžen, $u Dept. of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University in Prague, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, CZ-120 00, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: eruzi@lf1.cuni.cz. $d 1957- $7 jo20000074065
245    10
$a Tests of manual dexterity and speed in Parkinson's disease: Not all measure the same / $c E. Růžička, R. Krupička, K. Zárubová, J. Rusz, R. Jech, Z. Szabó,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Timed performance tests were introduced to overcome the disadvantages of subjective evaluation of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to verify their discriminative properties and compare them with the motion capture analysis of finger tapping. METHODS: We included 22 PD patients (10 M, 12 F), mean age 64 (range 48-82) yrs, Hoehn & Yahr stage 2 (1-2.5) and 22 (10 M, 12 F) normal controls, mean age 66 (41-82) yrs. The key tapping subtest of the Halstead-Reitan battery, the Purdue Pegboard test, and the Bradykinesia-Akinesia Incoordination (BRAIN) test were performed according to the test manuals. The finger tapping subtest of the UPDRS-III, item 23 was recorded using a contactless 3D motion capture system Optitrack-V120. Average frequency (AvgFrq), maximum opening velocity (MaxOpV) and amplitude decrement (AmpDec) were computed and simultaneous video recordings of finger tapping were rated by two experts. RESULTS: The AmpDec and MaxOpV motion capture measures best differentiated between PD patients and controls (AUC = 0.87 and 0.81). Of the instrumental tests, only the Purdue Pegboard attained significance in differentiating PD patients from controls (AUC = 0.80). In PD patients, MaxOpV correlated with the finger tapping ratings and BRAIN test, and AvgFrq correlated with the BRAIN and Halstead-Reitan test scores. Moreover, correlations were found between the Purdue Pegboard and finger tapping ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Contactless 3D motion capture of finger tapping allowed an independent analysis of individual components of bradykinesia, demonstrating the amplitude decrement and maximum opening velocity as the most powerful discriminators between PD patients and controls.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a prsty ruky $7 D005385
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypokineze $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D018476
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a Parkinsonova nemoc $x komplikace $x patofyziologie $7 D010300
650    _2
$a psychomotorický výkon $x fyziologie $7 D011597
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Krupička, Radim, $u Dept. of Biomedical Informatics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Sítná sq. 3105, CZ-272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: radim.krupicka@gmail.com. $d 1981- $7 xx0209817
700    1_
$a Zárubová, Kateřina $u Dept. of Neurology, Charles University in Prague, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, CZ-150 06, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: katzar@centrum.cz. $7 xx0155203
700    1_
$a Rusz, Jan $u Dept. of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University in Prague, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, CZ-120 00, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: rusz.mz@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Jech, Robert, $u Dept. of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University in Prague, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Kateřinská 30, CZ-120 00, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jech@cesnet.cz. $d 1969- $7 xx0082225
700    1_
$a Szabó, Zoltán $u Dept. of Biomedical Informatics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Sítná sq. 3105, CZ-272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: szabozol@fbmi.cvut.cz. $7 jx20080304016
773    0_
$w MED00006198 $t Parkinsonism & related disorders $x 1873-5126 $g Roč. 28, č. - (2016), s. 118-123
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27185294 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181015092903 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288700 $s 1008027
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 28 $c - $d 118-123 $e 20160507 $i 1873-5126 $m Parkinsonism & related disorders $n Parkinsonism Relat Disord $x MED00006198
GRA    __
$a NT14181 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...