Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program

JE. Mazuski, LB. Gasink, J. Armstrong, H. Broadhurst, GG. Stone, D. Rank, L. Llorens, P. Newell, J. Pachl,

. 2016 ; 62 (11) : 1380-1389. [pub] 20160308

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: When combined with ceftazidime, the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam provides a carbapenem alternative against multidrug-resistant infections. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole were compared with meropenem in 1066 men and women with complicated intra-abdominal infections from 2 identical, randomized, double-blind phase 3 studies (NCT01499290 and NCT01500239). METHODS: The primary end point was clinical cure at test-of-cure visit 28-35 days after randomization, assessed by noninferiority of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem in the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat (mMITT) population (in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance), and the modified intention-to-treat and clinically evaluable populations (European Medicines Agency guidance). Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-group difference was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -12.5%. RESULTS: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem across all primary analysis populations. Clinical cure rates with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and meropenem, respectively, were as follows: mMITT population, 81.6% and 85.1% (between-group difference, -3.5%; 95% confidence interval -8.64 to 1.58); modified intention-to-treat, 82.5% and 84.9% (-2.4%; -6.90 to 2.10); and clinically evaluable, 91.7% and 92.5% (-0.8%; -4.61 to 2.89). The clinical cure rate with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for ceftazidime-resistant infections was comparable to that with meropenem (mMITT population, 83.0% and 85.9%, respectively) and similar to the regimen's own efficacy against ceftazidime-susceptible infections (82.0%). Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Efficacy was similar against infections caused by ceftazidime-susceptible and ceftazidime-resistant pathogens. The safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was consistent with that previously observed with ceftazidime alone. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01499290 and NCT01500239.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18017335
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180518095101.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/cid/ciw133 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26962078
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mazuski, John E $u Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
245    10
$a Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program / $c JE. Mazuski, LB. Gasink, J. Armstrong, H. Broadhurst, GG. Stone, D. Rank, L. Llorens, P. Newell, J. Pachl,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: When combined with ceftazidime, the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam provides a carbapenem alternative against multidrug-resistant infections. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole were compared with meropenem in 1066 men and women with complicated intra-abdominal infections from 2 identical, randomized, double-blind phase 3 studies (NCT01499290 and NCT01500239). METHODS: The primary end point was clinical cure at test-of-cure visit 28-35 days after randomization, assessed by noninferiority of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole to meropenem in the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat (mMITT) population (in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance), and the modified intention-to-treat and clinically evaluable populations (European Medicines Agency guidance). Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-group difference was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin of -12.5%. RESULTS: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem across all primary analysis populations. Clinical cure rates with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and meropenem, respectively, were as follows: mMITT population, 81.6% and 85.1% (between-group difference, -3.5%; 95% confidence interval -8.64 to 1.58); modified intention-to-treat, 82.5% and 84.9% (-2.4%; -6.90 to 2.10); and clinically evaluable, 91.7% and 92.5% (-0.8%; -4.61 to 2.89). The clinical cure rate with ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for ceftazidime-resistant infections was comparable to that with meropenem (mMITT population, 83.0% and 85.9%, respectively) and similar to the regimen's own efficacy against ceftazidime-susceptible infections (82.0%). Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Efficacy was similar against infections caused by ceftazidime-susceptible and ceftazidime-resistant pathogens. The safety profile of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was consistent with that previously observed with ceftazidime alone. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01499290 and NCT01500239.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a antibakteriální látky $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000900
650    12
$a azabicyklické sloučeniny $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D053961
650    12
$a ceftazidim $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D002442
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nitrobřišní infekce $x farmakoterapie $x epidemiologie $7 D059413
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a metronidazol $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D008795
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a thienamyciny $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D013845
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Gasink, Leanne B $u AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware.
700    1_
$a Armstrong, Jon $u AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Broadhurst, Helen $u AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Stone, Greg G $u AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts.
700    1_
$a Rank, Douglas $u Actavis,Oakland, California.
700    1_
$a Llorens, Lily $u Actavis,Oakland, California.
700    1_
$a Newell, Paul $u AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Pachl, Jan $u The Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001133 $t Clinical infectious diseases an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America $x 1537-6591 $g Roč. 62, č. 11 (2016), s. 1380-1389
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26962078 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180518095239 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300959 $s 1014175
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 62 $c 11 $d 1380-1389 $e 20160308 $i 1537-6591 $m Clinical infectious diseases $n Clin Infect Dis $x MED00001133
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...