Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Adherence with perindopril therapy: a pilot study using therapeutic drug monitoring of perindoprilat and an evaluation of the clearance estimation

M. Šíma, M. Vodička, V. Marešová, T. Šálek, R. Čabala, O. Slanař,

. 2017 ; 39 (5) : 1095-1100. [pub] 20170808

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024751
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2011-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem

Background Although measurement of drug serum levels is an objective direct method for testing compliance, it can be distorted by "white-coat compliance" or by variations in drug elimination. Objective The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of noncompliance with perindopril therapy in adult out-patients using pharmacokinetic simulations. The additional aim was to compare the predictive performance of two glomerular filtration rate markers-creatinine and cystatin C. Setting Department of Cardiology, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital in Zlín, Czech Republic. Method Perindoprilat pharmacokinetic models individualized according to patient characteristics were compared with measured perindoprilat serum concentrations to document compliance. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relations between perindoprilat clearance and glomerular filtration rate estimated using creatinine and cystatin C. Main outcome measure Assessment of non-compliance with medication using drug concentration measurements reinforced with therapeutic drug monitoring. Results Non-detectable perindoprilat levels were observed in 26.1% of patients. Another 21.7% were classified as non-compliant based on therapeutic drug monitoring pharmacokinetic simulations. Volume of distribution, clearance and half-life median value (interquarti°range) for perindoprilat were 408.3 (360.4-456.8) L, 10.1 (4.9-17.0) L h-1 and 24.7 (19.4-62.7) h, respectively. Linear regression models showed tight relationship between cystatin C and perindoprilat clearance. Conclusions Assessment of adherence with medication reinforced with therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic simulations is proposed as an optimal method reducing disadvantages of simple drug concentration measurements. Cystatin C proves to be better surrogate marker for perindoprilat elimination than creatinine.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024751
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200221132450.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s11096-017-0522-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28791494
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Šíma, Martin $u Department of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. martin.sima@lf1.cuni.cz.
245    10
$a Adherence with perindopril therapy: a pilot study using therapeutic drug monitoring of perindoprilat and an evaluation of the clearance estimation / $c M. Šíma, M. Vodička, V. Marešová, T. Šálek, R. Čabala, O. Slanař,
520    9_
$a Background Although measurement of drug serum levels is an objective direct method for testing compliance, it can be distorted by "white-coat compliance" or by variations in drug elimination. Objective The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of noncompliance with perindopril therapy in adult out-patients using pharmacokinetic simulations. The additional aim was to compare the predictive performance of two glomerular filtration rate markers-creatinine and cystatin C. Setting Department of Cardiology, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital in Zlín, Czech Republic. Method Perindoprilat pharmacokinetic models individualized according to patient characteristics were compared with measured perindoprilat serum concentrations to document compliance. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relations between perindoprilat clearance and glomerular filtration rate estimated using creatinine and cystatin C. Main outcome measure Assessment of non-compliance with medication using drug concentration measurements reinforced with therapeutic drug monitoring. Results Non-detectable perindoprilat levels were observed in 26.1% of patients. Another 21.7% were classified as non-compliant based on therapeutic drug monitoring pharmacokinetic simulations. Volume of distribution, clearance and half-life median value (interquarti°range) for perindoprilat were 408.3 (360.4-456.8) L, 10.1 (4.9-17.0) L h-1 and 24.7 (19.4-62.7) h, respectively. Linear regression models showed tight relationship between cystatin C and perindoprilat clearance. Conclusions Assessment of adherence with medication reinforced with therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic simulations is proposed as an optimal method reducing disadvantages of simple drug concentration measurements. Cystatin C proves to be better surrogate marker for perindoprilat elimination than creatinine.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a inhibitory ACE $x metabolismus $x farmakologie $7 D000806
650    _2
$a kreatinin $x metabolismus $7 D003404
650    _2
$a cystatin C $x metabolismus $7 D055316
650    _2
$a monitorování léčiv $x metody $7 D016903
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a hodnoty glomerulární filtrace $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D005919
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a adherence k farmakoterapii $7 D055118
650    _2
$a metabolická clearance $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D008657
650    _2
$a perindopril $x metabolismus $x farmakologie $7 D020913
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vodička, Martin $u Department of Pharmacy, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlín, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Marešová, Věra $u Institute of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šálek, Tomáš, $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Tomas Bata Regional Hospital, Zlín, Czech Republic. $d 1974- $7 xx0174625
700    1_
$a Čabala, Radomír $u Institute of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Slanař, Ondřej $u Department of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180241 $t International journal of clinical pharmacy $x 2210-7711 $g Roč. 39, č. 5 (2017), s. 1095-1100
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28791494 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200221132855 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316882 $s 1021672
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 39 $c 5 $d 1095-1100 $e 20170808 $i 2210-7711 $m International journal of clinical pharmacy $n Int J Clin Pharm $x MED00180241
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...