• Something wrong with this record ?

Informal cash payments for birth in Hungary: Are women paying to secure a known provider, respect, or quality of care

P. Baji, N. Rubashkin, I. Szebik, K. Stoll, S. Vedam,

. 2017 ; 189 (-) : 86-95. [pub] 20170721

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: In Central and Eastern Europe, many women make informal cash payments to ensure continuity of provider, i.e., to have a "chosen" doctor who provided their prenatal care, be present for birth. High rates of obstetric interventions and disrespectful maternity care are also common to the region. No previous study has examined the associations among informal payments, intervention rates, and quality of maternity care. METHODS: We distributed an online cross-sectional survey in 2014 to a nationally representative sample of Hungarian internet-using women (N = 600) who had given birth in the last 5 years. The survey included items related to socio-demographics, type of provider, obstetric interventions, and experiences of care. Women reported if they paid informally, and how much. We built a two-part model, where a bivariate probit model was used to estimate conditional probabilities of women paying informally, and a GLM model to explore the amount of payments. We calculated marginal effects of the covariates (provider choice, interventions, respectful care). RESULTS: Many more women (79%) with a chosen doctor paid informally (191 euros on average) compared to 17% of women without a chosen doctor (86 euros). Based on regression analysis, the chosen doctor's presence at birth was the principal determinant of payment. Intervention and procedure rates were significantly higher for women with a chosen doctor versus without (cesareans 45% vs. 33%; inductions 32% vs. 19%; episiotomy 75% vs. 62%; epidural 13% vs. 5%), but had no direct effect on payments. Half of the sample (42% with a chosen doctor, 62% without) reported some form of disrespectful care, but this did not reduce payments. CONCLUSION: Despite reporting disrespect and higher rates of interventions, women rewarded the presence of a chosen doctor with informal payments. They may be unaware of evidence-based standards, and trust that their chosen doctor provided high quality maternity care.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024754
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180713112850.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.015 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28787630
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Baji, Petra $u Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary; CERGE-EI Fellow, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: petra.baji@uni-corvinus.hu.
245    10
$a Informal cash payments for birth in Hungary: Are women paying to secure a known provider, respect, or quality of care / $c P. Baji, N. Rubashkin, I. Szebik, K. Stoll, S. Vedam,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In Central and Eastern Europe, many women make informal cash payments to ensure continuity of provider, i.e., to have a "chosen" doctor who provided their prenatal care, be present for birth. High rates of obstetric interventions and disrespectful maternity care are also common to the region. No previous study has examined the associations among informal payments, intervention rates, and quality of maternity care. METHODS: We distributed an online cross-sectional survey in 2014 to a nationally representative sample of Hungarian internet-using women (N = 600) who had given birth in the last 5 years. The survey included items related to socio-demographics, type of provider, obstetric interventions, and experiences of care. Women reported if they paid informally, and how much. We built a two-part model, where a bivariate probit model was used to estimate conditional probabilities of women paying informally, and a GLM model to explore the amount of payments. We calculated marginal effects of the covariates (provider choice, interventions, respectful care). RESULTS: Many more women (79%) with a chosen doctor paid informally (191 euros on average) compared to 17% of women without a chosen doctor (86 euros). Based on regression analysis, the chosen doctor's presence at birth was the principal determinant of payment. Intervention and procedure rates were significantly higher for women with a chosen doctor versus without (cesareans 45% vs. 33%; inductions 32% vs. 19%; episiotomy 75% vs. 62%; epidural 13% vs. 5%), but had no direct effect on payments. Half of the sample (42% with a chosen doctor, 62% without) reported some form of disrespectful care, but this did not reduce payments. CONCLUSION: Despite reporting disrespect and higher rates of interventions, women rewarded the presence of a chosen doctor with informal payments. They may be unaware of evidence-based standards, and trust that their chosen doctor provided high quality maternity care.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a výdaje na zdravotnictví $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D005102
650    _2
$a zdravotnický personál $x ekonomika $x normy $7 D006282
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a Maďarsko $7 D006814
650    _2
$a internet $7 D020407
650    _2
$a porod $x psychologie $7 D036801
650    _2
$a péče o pacienta $x ekonomika $7 D005791
650    _2
$a kvalita zdravotní péče $x ekonomika $7 D011787
650    _2
$a regresní analýza $7 D012044
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Rubashkin, Nicholas $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department Global Health Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Szebik, Imre $u Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Stoll, Kathrin $u School of Population & Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Canada.
700    1_
$a Vedam, Saraswathi $u School of Population & Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Canada; Division of Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
773    0_
$w MED00008691 $t Social science & medicine (1982) $x 1873-5347 $g Roč. 189, č. - (2017), s. 86-95
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28787630 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180713113144 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316885 $s 1021675
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 189 $c - $d 86-95 $e 20170721 $i 1873-5347 $m Social science & medicine $n Soc Sci Med $x MED00008691
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...