-
Something wrong with this record ?
Informal cash payments for birth in Hungary: Are women paying to secure a known provider, respect, or quality of care
P. Baji, N. Rubashkin, I. Szebik, K. Stoll, S. Vedam,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Internet MeSH
- Quality of Health Care economics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Patient Care economics MeSH
- Parturition psychology MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Regression Analysis MeSH
- Health Expenditures statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Health Personnel economics standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Hungary MeSH
BACKGROUND: In Central and Eastern Europe, many women make informal cash payments to ensure continuity of provider, i.e., to have a "chosen" doctor who provided their prenatal care, be present for birth. High rates of obstetric interventions and disrespectful maternity care are also common to the region. No previous study has examined the associations among informal payments, intervention rates, and quality of maternity care. METHODS: We distributed an online cross-sectional survey in 2014 to a nationally representative sample of Hungarian internet-using women (N = 600) who had given birth in the last 5 years. The survey included items related to socio-demographics, type of provider, obstetric interventions, and experiences of care. Women reported if they paid informally, and how much. We built a two-part model, where a bivariate probit model was used to estimate conditional probabilities of women paying informally, and a GLM model to explore the amount of payments. We calculated marginal effects of the covariates (provider choice, interventions, respectful care). RESULTS: Many more women (79%) with a chosen doctor paid informally (191 euros on average) compared to 17% of women without a chosen doctor (86 euros). Based on regression analysis, the chosen doctor's presence at birth was the principal determinant of payment. Intervention and procedure rates were significantly higher for women with a chosen doctor versus without (cesareans 45% vs. 33%; inductions 32% vs. 19%; episiotomy 75% vs. 62%; epidural 13% vs. 5%), but had no direct effect on payments. Half of the sample (42% with a chosen doctor, 62% without) reported some form of disrespectful care, but this did not reduce payments. CONCLUSION: Despite reporting disrespect and higher rates of interventions, women rewarded the presence of a chosen doctor with informal payments. They may be unaware of evidence-based standards, and trust that their chosen doctor provided high quality maternity care.
CERGE EI Fellow Prague Czech Republic
Department Global Health Sciences University of California at San Francisco San Francisco CA USA
Department of Health Economics Corvinus University of Budapest Budapest Hungary
Division of Midwifery Faculty of Medicine University of British Columbia Canada
Institute of Behavioral Sciences Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
School of Population and Public Health Faculty of Medicine The University of British Columbia Canada
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18024754
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180713112850.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.015 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28787630
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Baji, Petra $u Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary; CERGE-EI Fellow, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: petra.baji@uni-corvinus.hu.
- 245 10
- $a Informal cash payments for birth in Hungary: Are women paying to secure a known provider, respect, or quality of care / $c P. Baji, N. Rubashkin, I. Szebik, K. Stoll, S. Vedam,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: In Central and Eastern Europe, many women make informal cash payments to ensure continuity of provider, i.e., to have a "chosen" doctor who provided their prenatal care, be present for birth. High rates of obstetric interventions and disrespectful maternity care are also common to the region. No previous study has examined the associations among informal payments, intervention rates, and quality of maternity care. METHODS: We distributed an online cross-sectional survey in 2014 to a nationally representative sample of Hungarian internet-using women (N = 600) who had given birth in the last 5 years. The survey included items related to socio-demographics, type of provider, obstetric interventions, and experiences of care. Women reported if they paid informally, and how much. We built a two-part model, where a bivariate probit model was used to estimate conditional probabilities of women paying informally, and a GLM model to explore the amount of payments. We calculated marginal effects of the covariates (provider choice, interventions, respectful care). RESULTS: Many more women (79%) with a chosen doctor paid informally (191 euros on average) compared to 17% of women without a chosen doctor (86 euros). Based on regression analysis, the chosen doctor's presence at birth was the principal determinant of payment. Intervention and procedure rates were significantly higher for women with a chosen doctor versus without (cesareans 45% vs. 33%; inductions 32% vs. 19%; episiotomy 75% vs. 62%; epidural 13% vs. 5%), but had no direct effect on payments. Half of the sample (42% with a chosen doctor, 62% without) reported some form of disrespectful care, but this did not reduce payments. CONCLUSION: Despite reporting disrespect and higher rates of interventions, women rewarded the presence of a chosen doctor with informal payments. They may be unaware of evidence-based standards, and trust that their chosen doctor provided high quality maternity care.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a výdaje na zdravotnictví $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D005102
- 650 _2
- $a zdravotnický personál $x ekonomika $x normy $7 D006282
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Maďarsko $7 D006814
- 650 _2
- $a internet $7 D020407
- 650 _2
- $a porod $x psychologie $7 D036801
- 650 _2
- $a péče o pacienta $x ekonomika $7 D005791
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita zdravotní péče $x ekonomika $7 D011787
- 650 _2
- $a regresní analýza $7 D012044
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Rubashkin, Nicholas $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department Global Health Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Szebik, Imre $u Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Stoll, Kathrin $u School of Population & Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Vedam, Saraswathi $u School of Population & Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Canada; Division of Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008691 $t Social science & medicine (1982) $x 1873-5347 $g Roč. 189, č. - (2017), s. 86-95
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28787630 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180713113144 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1316885 $s 1021675
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 189 $c - $d 86-95 $e 20170721 $i 1873-5347 $m Social science & medicine $n Soc Sci Med $x MED00008691
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709