Combined Cancer Immunotherapy Against Aurora Kinase A
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
27070447
DOI
10.1097/cji.0000000000000120
PII: 00002371-201605000-00002
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Lymphocyte Activation MeSH
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor antagonists & inhibitors MeSH
- Aurora Kinase A genetics immunology metabolism MeSH
- Cell Growth Processes drug effects MeSH
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes immunology MeSH
- Vaccines, DNA MeSH
- Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte genetics immunology metabolism MeSH
- H-2 Antigens metabolism MeSH
- HEK293 Cells MeSH
- Immunization MeSH
- Immunotherapy * MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use MeSH
- Mice, Inbred C57BL MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Cancer Vaccines immunology MeSH
- Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit immunology MeSH
- T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory immunology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor MeSH
- Aurora Kinase A MeSH
- Vaccines, DNA MeSH
- Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte MeSH
- H-2 Antigens MeSH
- H-2Kb protein, mouse MeSH Browser
- Antibodies, Monoclonal MeSH
- Cancer Vaccines MeSH
- Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit MeSH
Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is a centrosomal protein that is overexpressed in a number of human malignancies and can contribute to tumor progression. As we used this protein as a target of DNA immunization, we increased its immunogenicity by the addition of the PADRE helper epitope and decreased its potential oncogenicity by mutagenesis of the kinase domain. For in vitro analysis of induced immune responses in mice, we identified the Aurka(220-228) nonapeptide representing an H-2Kb epitope. As DNA vaccination against the Aurka self-antigen by a gene gun did not show any antitumor effect, we combined DNA immunization with anti-CD25 treatment that depletes mainly regulatory T cells. Whereas 1 anti-CD25 dose injected before DNA vaccination did not enhance the activation of Aurka-specific splenocytes, 3 doses administered on days of immunizations augmented about 10-fold immunity against Aurka. However, an opposite effect was found for antitumor immunity-only 1 anti-CD25 dose combined with DNA vaccination reduced tumor growth. Moreover, the administration of 3 doses of anti-CD25 antibody alone accelerated tumor growth. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating cells showed that 3 anti-CD25 doses not only efficiently depleted regulatory T cells but also activated helper T cells and CD3(-)CD25(+) cells. Next, we found that blockade of the PD-1 receptor initiated 1 week after the first immunization was necessary for significant inhibition of tumor growth with therapeutic DNA vaccination against Aurka combined with depletion of CD25 cells. Our results suggest that combined cancer immunotherapy should be carefully evaluated to achieve the optimal antitumor effect.
References provided by Crossref.org
Implementation of Mass Cytometry for Immunoprofiling of Patients with Solid Tumors