Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Levels of detection of hypertension in primary medical care and interventions to improve detection: a systematic review of the evidence since 2000

R. Baker, A. Wilson, K. Nockels, S. Agarwal, P. Modi, J. Bankart,

. 2018 ; 8 (3) : e019965. [pub] 20180322

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18033225

OBJECTIVES: In England, many hypertensives are not detected by primary medical care. Higher detection is associated with lower premature mortality. We aimed to summarise recent evidence on detection and interventions to improve detection in order to inform policies to improve care. DESIGN: Data sources: systematic review of articles published since 2000. Searches of Medline and Embase were undertaken. Eligibility criteria: published in English, any study design, the setting was general practice and studies included patients aged 18 or over. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: screening schemes, studies in primary care settings other than general practice, discussion or comment pieces. PARTICIPANTS: adult patients of primary medical care services. SYNTHESIS: study heterogeneity precluded a statistical synthesis, and papers were described in summary tables. RESULTS: Seventeen quantitative and one qualitative studies were included. Detection rates varied by gender and ethnic group, but longitudinal studies indicated an improvement in detection over time. Patient socioeconomic factors did not influence detection, but living alone was associated with lower detection. Few health system factors were associated with detection, but in two studies higher numbers of general practitioners per 1000 population were associated with higher detection. Three studies investigated interventions to improve detection, but none showed evidence of effectiveness. LIMITATIONS: The search was limited to studies published from 2000, in English. There were few studies of interventions to improve detection, and a meta-analysis was not possible. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Levels of detection of hypertension by general practices may be improving, but large numbers of people with hypertension remain undetected. Improvement in detection is therefore required, but guidance for primary medical care is not provided by the few studies of interventions included in this review. Primary care teams should continue to use low-cost, practical approaches to detecting hypertension until evidence from new studies of interventions to improve detection is available.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033225
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181022130848.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019965 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29567850
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Baker, Richard $u Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
245    10
$a Levels of detection of hypertension in primary medical care and interventions to improve detection: a systematic review of the evidence since 2000 / $c R. Baker, A. Wilson, K. Nockels, S. Agarwal, P. Modi, J. Bankart,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: In England, many hypertensives are not detected by primary medical care. Higher detection is associated with lower premature mortality. We aimed to summarise recent evidence on detection and interventions to improve detection in order to inform policies to improve care. DESIGN: Data sources: systematic review of articles published since 2000. Searches of Medline and Embase were undertaken. Eligibility criteria: published in English, any study design, the setting was general practice and studies included patients aged 18 or over. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: screening schemes, studies in primary care settings other than general practice, discussion or comment pieces. PARTICIPANTS: adult patients of primary medical care services. SYNTHESIS: study heterogeneity precluded a statistical synthesis, and papers were described in summary tables. RESULTS: Seventeen quantitative and one qualitative studies were included. Detection rates varied by gender and ethnic group, but longitudinal studies indicated an improvement in detection over time. Patient socioeconomic factors did not influence detection, but living alone was associated with lower detection. Few health system factors were associated with detection, but in two studies higher numbers of general practitioners per 1000 population were associated with higher detection. Three studies investigated interventions to improve detection, but none showed evidence of effectiveness. LIMITATIONS: The search was limited to studies published from 2000, in English. There were few studies of interventions to improve detection, and a meta-analysis was not possible. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Levels of detection of hypertension by general practices may be improving, but large numbers of people with hypertension remain undetected. Improvement in detection is therefore required, but guidance for primary medical care is not provided by the few studies of interventions included in this review. Primary care teams should continue to use low-cost, practical approaches to detecting hypertension until evidence from new studies of interventions to improve detection is available.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypertenze $x diagnóza $x ekonomika $x epidemiologie $7 D006973
650    _2
$a předčasná smrt $x trendy $7 D061213
650    _2
$a primární zdravotní péče $x normy $7 D011320
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Wilson, Andrew $u Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
700    1_
$a Nockels, Keith $u Learning and Teaching Services, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
700    1_
$a Agarwal, Shona $u Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
700    1_
$a Modi, Priya $u Faculty of Medicine, Charles' University, Praha, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bankart, John $u Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00184484 $t BMJ open $x 2044-6055 $g Roč. 8, č. 3 (2018), s. e019965
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29567850 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181022131353 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340060 $s 1030219
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 8 $c 3 $d e019965 $e 20180322 $i 2044-6055 $m BMJ open $n BMJ Open $x MED00184484
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...