Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

"Coil mainly" policy in management of intracranial ACoA aneurysms: single-centre experience with the systematic review of literature and meta-analysis

A. Steklacova, O. Bradac, P. de Lacy, J. Lacman, F. Charvat, V. Benes,

. 2018 ; 41 (3) : 825-839. [pub] 20171128

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18033517

Endovascular techniques are still expanding in their capability by introducing novel technologies. Nevertheless, anterior communicating artery (ACoA) remains the region with high propensity for aneurysm (AN) re-growth after endovascular intervention. The purpose of this study is to highlight the ongoing importance for microsurgical treatment. The authors conducted a single-institution retrospective study of ACoA AN treatment between January 2000 and December 2016 maintaining "coil mainly" policy. The results are supplied with a systematic review of the literature. A total of n = 398 ACoA ANs were treated in n = 398 consecutive patients (207 females, 191 males). Microsurgical treatment was performed for 79 AN patients (54 ruptured, 25 unruptured), and 319 AN patients (250 ruptured, 69 unruptured) underwent coiling procedure. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality (MM) for unruptured ANs was 0% in the microsurgical and 1.5% in the endovascular group (p = 1.000). The percentage of patients with none or minor permanent deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage was 74% in the microsurgical and 70% in the endovascular group (p = 0.693). The re-treatment rate was 3.8% in microsurgical group and 9.2% in endovascular group (p = 0.883). A literature review identified 39 studies concerning ACoA AN treatment. Clinical results of both modalities were comparable, with microsurgery being superior regarding radiological outcomes. This study demonstrates that both treatment techniques bring comparable clinical benefit to the patient. Microsurgery seemed superior regarding radiological outcomes. The decision about the treatment strategy should be made by a multi-disciplinary team consisting of specialists from both teams, bearing in mind the higher occlusion rate and longevity of the surgical treatment.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033517
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181016094841.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10143-017-0932-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29181806
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Steklacova, Anna $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University, U Vojenske Nemocnice 1200, Praha 6, 169 02, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a "Coil mainly" policy in management of intracranial ACoA aneurysms: single-centre experience with the systematic review of literature and meta-analysis / $c A. Steklacova, O. Bradac, P. de Lacy, J. Lacman, F. Charvat, V. Benes,
520    9_
$a Endovascular techniques are still expanding in their capability by introducing novel technologies. Nevertheless, anterior communicating artery (ACoA) remains the region with high propensity for aneurysm (AN) re-growth after endovascular intervention. The purpose of this study is to highlight the ongoing importance for microsurgical treatment. The authors conducted a single-institution retrospective study of ACoA AN treatment between January 2000 and December 2016 maintaining "coil mainly" policy. The results are supplied with a systematic review of the literature. A total of n = 398 ACoA ANs were treated in n = 398 consecutive patients (207 females, 191 males). Microsurgical treatment was performed for 79 AN patients (54 ruptured, 25 unruptured), and 319 AN patients (250 ruptured, 69 unruptured) underwent coiling procedure. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality (MM) for unruptured ANs was 0% in the microsurgical and 1.5% in the endovascular group (p = 1.000). The percentage of patients with none or minor permanent deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage was 74% in the microsurgical and 70% in the endovascular group (p = 0.693). The re-treatment rate was 3.8% in microsurgical group and 9.2% in endovascular group (p = 0.883). A literature review identified 39 studies concerning ACoA AN treatment. Clinical results of both modalities were comparable, with microsurgery being superior regarding radiological outcomes. This study demonstrates that both treatment techniques bring comparable clinical benefit to the patient. Microsurgery seemed superior regarding radiological outcomes. The decision about the treatment strategy should be made by a multi-disciplinary team consisting of specialists from both teams, bearing in mind the higher occlusion rate and longevity of the surgical treatment.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a arteria cerebri anterior $x chirurgie $7 D020771
650    12
$a cévní protézy $7 D001807
650    _2
$a implantace prsní náhrady $x metody $7 D019928
650    _2
$a revaskularizace mozku $7 D002548
650    _2
$a endovaskulární výkony $x metody $7 D057510
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a intrakraniální aneurysma $x chirurgie $7 D002532
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a neurochirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D019635
650    _2
$a reoperace $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012086
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Bradac, Ondrej $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University, U Vojenske Nemocnice 1200, Praha 6, 169 02, Prague, Czech Republic. ondrej.bradac@uvn.cz.
700    1_
$a de Lacy, Patricia $u Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
700    1_
$a Lacman, Jiri $u Department of Neuroradiology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Charvat, Frantisek $u Department of Neuroradiology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Benes, Vladimir $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University, U Vojenske Nemocnice 1200, Praha 6, 169 02, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00003513 $t Neurosurgical review $x 1437-2320 $g Roč. 41, č. 3 (2018), s. 825-839
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29181806 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181016095338 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340188 $s 1030511
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 41 $c 3 $d 825-839 $e 20171128 $i 1437-2320 $m Neurosurgical review $n Neurosurg Rev $x MED00003513
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...