Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

A Comparative Analysis of Methods for Evaluation of ECG Signal Quality after Compression

A. Němcová, R. Smíšek, L. Maršánová, L. Smital, M. Vítek,

. 2018 ; 2018 (-) : 1868519. [pub] 20180718

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Review

The assessment of ECG signal quality after compression is an essential part of the compression process. Compression facilitates the signal archiving, speeds up signal transmission, and reduces the energy consumption. Conversely, lossy compression distorts the signals. Therefore, it is necessary to express the compression performance through both compression efficiency and signal quality. This paper provides an overview of objective algorithms for the assessment of both ECG signal quality after compression and compression efficiency. In this area, there is a lack of standardization, and there is no extensive review as such. 40 methods were tested in terms of their suitability for quality assessment. For this purpose, the whole CSE database was used. The tested signals were compressed using an algorithm based on SPIHT with varying efficiency. As a reference, compressed signals were manually assessed by two experts and classified into three quality groups. Owing to the experts' classification, we determined corresponding ranges of selected quality evaluation methods' values. The suitability of the methods for quality assessment was evaluated based on five criteria. For the assessment of ECG signal quality after compression, we recommend using a combination of these methods: PSim SDNN, QS, SNR1, MSE, PRDN1, MAX, STDERR, and WEDD SWT.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19000461
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250507093620.0
007      
ta
008      
190107e20180718xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1155/2018/1868519 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30112363
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Němcová, Andrea $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic. $7 xx0331813
245    12
$a A Comparative Analysis of Methods for Evaluation of ECG Signal Quality after Compression / $c A. Němcová, R. Smíšek, L. Maršánová, L. Smital, M. Vítek,
520    9_
$a The assessment of ECG signal quality after compression is an essential part of the compression process. Compression facilitates the signal archiving, speeds up signal transmission, and reduces the energy consumption. Conversely, lossy compression distorts the signals. Therefore, it is necessary to express the compression performance through both compression efficiency and signal quality. This paper provides an overview of objective algorithms for the assessment of both ECG signal quality after compression and compression efficiency. In this area, there is a lack of standardization, and there is no extensive review as such. 40 methods were tested in terms of their suitability for quality assessment. For this purpose, the whole CSE database was used. The tested signals were compressed using an algorithm based on SPIHT with varying efficiency. As a reference, compressed signals were manually assessed by two experts and classified into three quality groups. Owing to the experts' classification, we determined corresponding ranges of selected quality evaluation methods' values. The suitability of the methods for quality assessment was evaluated based on five criteria. For the assessment of ECG signal quality after compression, we recommend using a combination of these methods: PSim SDNN, QS, SNR1, MSE, PRDN1, MAX, STDERR, and WEDD SWT.
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a komprese dat $7 D044962
650    _2
$a databáze faktografické $7 D016208
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    12
$a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Smíšek, Radovan $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Institute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Maršánová, Lucie $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Smital, Lukáš $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vítek, Martin $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technická 12, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00182164 $t BioMed research international $x 2314-6141 $g Roč. 2018 (20180718), s. 1868519
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30112363 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250507093618 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1363850 $s 1038584
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 2018 $c - $d 1868519 $e 20180718 $i 2314-6141 $m BioMed research international $n Biomed Res Int $x MED00182164
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190107

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...