-
Something wrong with this record ?
Functional differences in upper limb movement after early and chronic stroke based on kinematic motion indicators
M. Blaszczyszyn, A. Szczesna, J. Opara, M. Konieczny, P. Pakosz, S. Balko
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
PubMed
30338767
DOI
10.5507/bp.2018.061
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Stroke pathology MeSH
- Upper Extremity innervation physiopathology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Stroke Rehabilitation * MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Motion Capture * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
AIMS: The main purpose of this study was to determine the changes in kinematic parameters of ischemic stroke affected upper limbs, during simple functional activity, to determine the most relevant changes. METHODS: The OptiTrack system was used for motion capture. To determine upper extremity function in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. During particular phases, the following matrices were chosen: mean and peak speed, normalized movement unit, normalized jerk and phase movement time. The chosen matrices represent the speed and smoothness profile of end-point data. The the arm-trunk compensation was also taken into consideration. Twenty stroke patients, in early (G1 from 1 to 3 months after stroke) and chronic stage (G2 from 6 months to 1 year), were studied. The large and small cylinder forward and back transporting phases were evaluated. RESULTS: The most significant differences between groups G1 and G2 were in mean and peak speed of the forward transport of the large and small cylinders for the paretic limb. Significant differences were also found for the smoothness (measured by movement unit, mean and peak speed and jerk) where the G2 group had a rougher motion. There were also differences in arm-trunk compensation in the frontal plane. CONCLUSION: The variables used in the study showed applicability in assessing kinematic parameters in both the early and chronic period after stroke.
Academy of Physical Education ul Mikolowska 72a 40 065 Katowice Poland
Institute of Informatics Silesian University of Technology 44 100 Gliwice Akademicka 16 Poland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19011730
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230314145026.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190404s2018 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2018.061 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30338767
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Blaszczyszyn, Monika $u Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Proszkowska 76, Poland.
- 245 10
- $a Functional differences in upper limb movement after early and chronic stroke based on kinematic motion indicators / $c M. Blaszczyszyn, A. Szczesna, J. Opara, M. Konieczny, P. Pakosz, S. Balko
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: The main purpose of this study was to determine the changes in kinematic parameters of ischemic stroke affected upper limbs, during simple functional activity, to determine the most relevant changes. METHODS: The OptiTrack system was used for motion capture. To determine upper extremity function in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. During particular phases, the following matrices were chosen: mean and peak speed, normalized movement unit, normalized jerk and phase movement time. The chosen matrices represent the speed and smoothness profile of end-point data. The the arm-trunk compensation was also taken into consideration. Twenty stroke patients, in early (G1 from 1 to 3 months after stroke) and chronic stage (G2 from 6 months to 1 year), were studied. The large and small cylinder forward and back transporting phases were evaluated. RESULTS: The most significant differences between groups G1 and G2 were in mean and peak speed of the forward transport of the large and small cylinders for the paretic limb. Significant differences were also found for the smoothness (measured by movement unit, mean and peak speed and jerk) where the G2 group had a rougher motion. There were also differences in arm-trunk compensation in the frontal plane. CONCLUSION: The variables used in the study showed applicability in assessing kinematic parameters in both the early and chronic period after stroke.
- 650 _7
- $a cévní mozková příhoda $x patologie $7 D020521 $2 czmesh
- 650 17
- $a rehabilitace po cévní mozkové příhodě $7 D000071939 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a horní končetina $x inervace $x patofyziologie $7 D034941 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696 $2 czmesh
- 650 17
- $a snímání pohybu $7 D000092682 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a senioři $7 D000368 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260 $2 czmesh
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Szczesna, Agnieszka $u Institute of Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Akademicka 16, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Opara, Jozef $u Academy of Physical Education, ul. Mikolowska 72a, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Konieczny, Mariusz $u Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Proszkowska 76, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Pakosz, Pawel $u Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Proszkowska 76, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Balkó, Štefan, $u Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, J.E. Purkyne University, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic. $d 1980- $7 xx0212232
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 162, č. 4 (2018), s. 294-303
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30338767 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230314145023 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1390877 $s 1050035
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 162 $c 4 $d 294-303 $e 20181011 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $c NLK182 $d 20230314 $b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20190404