-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Inequalities in the Use of eHealth Between Socioeconomic Groups Among Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study
AH. Hansen, M. Bradway, J. Broz, T. Claudi, Ø. Henriksen, SC. Wangberg, E. Årsand,
Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 1999
Free Medical Journals
od 1999
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 1999
PubMed Central
od 1999
Europe PubMed Central
od 1999
ProQuest Central
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2005-02-24
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2001-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1999
PubMed
31144669
DOI
10.2196/13615
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 2. typu terapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- prevalence MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- socioekonomické faktory MeSH
- společenská třída * MeSH
- telemedicína statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes and the use of electronic health (eHealth) are increasing. People with diabetes need frequent monitoring and follow-up of health parameters, and eHealth services can be highly valuable. However, little is known about the use of eHealth in different socioeconomic groups among people with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of 4 different eHealth platforms (apps, search engines, video services, and social media sites) and the association with socioeconomic status (SES) among people diagnosed with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1D and T2D, respectively). METHODS: We used email survey data from 1250 members of the Norwegian Diabetes Association (aged 18-89 years), collected in 2018. Eligible for analyses were the 1063 respondents having T1D (n=523) and T2D (n=545). 5 respondents reported having both diabetes types and thus entered into both groups. Using descriptive statistics, we estimated the use of the different types of eHealth. By logistic regressions, we studied the associations between the use of these types of eHealth and SES (education and household income), adjusted for gender, age, and self-rated health. RESULTS: We found that 87.0% (447/514) of people with T1D and 77.7% (421/542) of people with T2D had used 1 or more forms of eHealth sometimes or often during the previous year. The proportion of people using search engines was the largest in both diagnostic groups, followed by apps, social media, and video services. We found a strong association between a high level of education and the use of search engines, whereas there were no educational differences for the use of apps, social media, or video services. In both diagnostic groups, high income was associated with the use of apps. In people with T1D, lower income was associated with the use of video services. CONCLUSIONS: This paper indicates a digital divide among people with diabetes in Norway, with consequences that may contribute to sustaining and shaping inequalities in health outcomes. The strong relationship between higher education and the use of search engines, along with the finding that the use of apps, social media, and video services was not associated with education, indicates that adequate communication strategies for audiences with varying education levels should be a focus in future efforts to reduce inequalities in health outcomes.
Department of Internal Medicine 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Medicine Nordland Hospital Bodø Norway
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006322
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200522105725.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 xxc f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2196/13615 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31144669
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxc
- 100 1_
- $a Hansen, Anne Helen $u Centre for Quality Improvement and Development, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
- 245 10
- $a Inequalities in the Use of eHealth Between Socioeconomic Groups Among Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-Sectional Study / $c AH. Hansen, M. Bradway, J. Broz, T. Claudi, Ø. Henriksen, SC. Wangberg, E. Årsand,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes and the use of electronic health (eHealth) are increasing. People with diabetes need frequent monitoring and follow-up of health parameters, and eHealth services can be highly valuable. However, little is known about the use of eHealth in different socioeconomic groups among people with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of 4 different eHealth platforms (apps, search engines, video services, and social media sites) and the association with socioeconomic status (SES) among people diagnosed with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1D and T2D, respectively). METHODS: We used email survey data from 1250 members of the Norwegian Diabetes Association (aged 18-89 years), collected in 2018. Eligible for analyses were the 1063 respondents having T1D (n=523) and T2D (n=545). 5 respondents reported having both diabetes types and thus entered into both groups. Using descriptive statistics, we estimated the use of the different types of eHealth. By logistic regressions, we studied the associations between the use of these types of eHealth and SES (education and household income), adjusted for gender, age, and self-rated health. RESULTS: We found that 87.0% (447/514) of people with T1D and 77.7% (421/542) of people with T2D had used 1 or more forms of eHealth sometimes or often during the previous year. The proportion of people using search engines was the largest in both diagnostic groups, followed by apps, social media, and video services. We found a strong association between a high level of education and the use of search engines, whereas there were no educational differences for the use of apps, social media, or video services. In both diagnostic groups, high income was associated with the use of apps. In people with T1D, lower income was associated with the use of video services. CONCLUSIONS: This paper indicates a digital divide among people with diabetes in Norway, with consequences that may contribute to sustaining and shaping inequalities in health outcomes. The strong relationship between higher education and the use of search engines, along with the finding that the use of apps, social media, and video services was not associated with education, indicates that adequate communication strategies for audiences with varying education levels should be a focus in future efforts to reduce inequalities in health outcomes.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a diabetes mellitus 2. typu $x terapie $7 D003924
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prevalence $7 D015995
- 650 12
- $a společenská třída $7 D012923
- 650 _2
- $a socioekonomické faktory $7 D012959
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a telemedicína $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D017216
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Bradway, Meghan $u Norwegian Centre for eHealth Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Department of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Broz, Jan $u Department of Internal Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Claudi, Tor $u Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Henriksen, Øystein $u Faculty of Social Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Wangberg, Silje C $u Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Narvik, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Årsand, Eirik $u Norwegian Centre for eHealth Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007388 $t Journal of medical Internet research $x 1438-8871 $g Roč. 21, č. 5 (2019), s. e13615
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31144669 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200522105723 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1525180 $s 1096378
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 21 $c 5 $d e13615 $e 20190529 $i 1438-8871 $m JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $n J Med Internat Res $x MED00007388
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511