-
Something wrong with this record ?
Whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry demonstrates better reliability than segmental body composition analysis in college-aged students
P. Kutáč, V. Bunc, M. Sigmund,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Absorptiometry, Photon methods MeSH
- Lower Extremity diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Upper Extremity diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Bone Density physiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Body Composition physiology MeSH
- Students statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Body Constitution physiology MeSH
- Adipose Tissue diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Universities MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is rapidly becoming more accessible and popular as a technique to monitor body composition. The reliability of DXA has been examined extensively using a number of different methodological approaches. This study sets up to investigate the accuracy of measuring the parameters of body composition (BC) by means of the whole-body and the segmental DXA method analysis with the typical error of measurement (TEM) that allows for expressing the error in the units of measure. The research was implemented in a group of 63 participants, all of whom were university students. Thirty-eight males (22.6±2.9 years, average body mass 77.5±8.4 kg) and 25 females (21.4±2.0 years, average body mass 58.6±7.2 kg) were recruited. The measured parameters included body mass (BM), fat-free mass (FFM), body fat (BF), bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD). For the whole-body analysis, the determined TEM was: BM at the level of 0.12 kg in females and 0.29 kg in males; BF 0.25kg and 0.44% females, 0.52 kg and 0.66% males; FFM 0.24 kg females and 0.42 kg males; BMC 0.02 kg females and males; BMD 0.01g/cm2 females and males. The TEM values in the segmental analysis were: BF within the range of 0.04-0.28 kg and 0.68-1.20% in females, 0.10-0.36 kg and 0.72-1.94% in males; FFM 0.08-0.41 kg females and 0.17-0.86 males, BMC 0.00-0.02 kg females and 0.01-0.02 kg males in relation to the body segment (upper limb, trunk, lower limb). The BMD value was at the level of 0.01-0.02g/cm2. The study results showed high reliability in measuring body composition parameters using the DXA method. The whole-body analysis showed a higher accuracy of measurement than the segmental. Only the changes that are greater than the TEM, or the upper bound (95%) of the confidence interval of the measurement can be considered demonstrable when interpreting repeated measurements.
Application Centre BALUO Faculty of Physical Culture Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Praha Czech Republic
Human Motion Diagnostics Center University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006436
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200518132642.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0215599 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31009495
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kutáč, Petr $u Human Motion Diagnostics Center, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry demonstrates better reliability than segmental body composition analysis in college-aged students / $c P. Kutáč, V. Bunc, M. Sigmund,
- 520 9_
- $a Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is rapidly becoming more accessible and popular as a technique to monitor body composition. The reliability of DXA has been examined extensively using a number of different methodological approaches. This study sets up to investigate the accuracy of measuring the parameters of body composition (BC) by means of the whole-body and the segmental DXA method analysis with the typical error of measurement (TEM) that allows for expressing the error in the units of measure. The research was implemented in a group of 63 participants, all of whom were university students. Thirty-eight males (22.6±2.9 years, average body mass 77.5±8.4 kg) and 25 females (21.4±2.0 years, average body mass 58.6±7.2 kg) were recruited. The measured parameters included body mass (BM), fat-free mass (FFM), body fat (BF), bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD). For the whole-body analysis, the determined TEM was: BM at the level of 0.12 kg in females and 0.29 kg in males; BF 0.25kg and 0.44% females, 0.52 kg and 0.66% males; FFM 0.24 kg females and 0.42 kg males; BMC 0.02 kg females and males; BMD 0.01g/cm2 females and males. The TEM values in the segmental analysis were: BF within the range of 0.04-0.28 kg and 0.68-1.20% in females, 0.10-0.36 kg and 0.72-1.94% in males; FFM 0.08-0.41 kg females and 0.17-0.86 males, BMC 0.00-0.02 kg females and 0.01-0.02 kg males in relation to the body segment (upper limb, trunk, lower limb). The BMD value was at the level of 0.01-0.02g/cm2. The study results showed high reliability in measuring body composition parameters using the DXA method. The whole-body analysis showed a higher accuracy of measurement than the segmental. Only the changes that are greater than the TEM, or the upper bound (95%) of the confidence interval of the measurement can be considered demonstrable when interpreting repeated measurements.
- 650 _2
- $a absorpční fotometrie $x metody $7 D015502
- 650 _2
- $a tuková tkáň $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D000273
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a složení těla $x fyziologie $7 D001823
- 650 _2
- $a tělesná konstituce $x fyziologie $7 D001824
- 650 _2
- $a kostní denzita $x fyziologie $7 D015519
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a dolní končetina $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D035002
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a studenti $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D013334
- 650 _2
- $a univerzity $7 D014495
- 650 _2
- $a horní končetina $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D034941
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Bunc, Václav $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sigmund, Martin $u Application Centre BALUO, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 4 (2019), s. e0215599
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31009495 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200518132642 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1525294 $s 1096492
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 14 $c 4 $d e0215599 $e 20190422 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511