-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping
D. Kubicek, M. Hornak, J. Horak, R. Navratil, G. Tauwinklova, J. Rubes, K. Vesela,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- aneuploidie * MeSH
- chromozomální aberace * MeSH
- chromozomální poruchy epidemiologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fertilizace in vitro * MeSH
- genetické testování MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- karyotypizace MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- meióza * MeSH
- preimplantační diagnóza metody MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental aneuploidies detected by karyomapping at a blastocyst stage in human-derived IVF embryos? What is the distribution of various types of errors, including rare chromosomal abnormalities? DESIGN: The incidence of chromosomal aneuploidies was assessed in 967 trophectoderm biopsies from 180 couples who underwent 215 cycles of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease with a known causal mutation with a mean maternal age of 32.7 years. DNA from both parents and a reference sample was genotyped together with the analysed trophectoderm samples by karyomapping (single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based array). RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 31% of the analysed samples. At least one whole chromosomal aneuploidy was detected in 27.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies, whereas a segmental aneuploidy was detected in 5.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies. Our results reveal that segmental aneuploidies predominantly affect paternally derived chromosomes (70.4%; P < 0.01) compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidies that more frequently affect maternally derived chromosomes (90.1%; P < 0.0001). Also, the frequency of meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII) errors was established in meiotic trisomies; MI errors were observed to be more frequent (n = 102/147 [69.4%]) than MII errors (n = 45/147 [30.6%]). CONCLUSIONS: Karyomapping is a robust method that is suitable for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease and for detecting meiotic aneuploidies, including meiotic segmental aneuploidies, and provides complex information about their parental origin. Our results revealed that segmental aneuploidy more frequently affects paternal chromosomes compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidy in human IVF embryos at the blastocyst stage.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006651
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200525100405.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30639160
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kubicek, David $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology - Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: dkubicek@repromeda.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping / $c D. Kubicek, M. Hornak, J. Horak, R. Navratil, G. Tauwinklova, J. Rubes, K. Vesela,
- 520 9_
- $a RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental aneuploidies detected by karyomapping at a blastocyst stage in human-derived IVF embryos? What is the distribution of various types of errors, including rare chromosomal abnormalities? DESIGN: The incidence of chromosomal aneuploidies was assessed in 967 trophectoderm biopsies from 180 couples who underwent 215 cycles of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease with a known causal mutation with a mean maternal age of 32.7 years. DNA from both parents and a reference sample was genotyped together with the analysed trophectoderm samples by karyomapping (single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based array). RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 31% of the analysed samples. At least one whole chromosomal aneuploidy was detected in 27.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies, whereas a segmental aneuploidy was detected in 5.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies. Our results reveal that segmental aneuploidies predominantly affect paternally derived chromosomes (70.4%; P < 0.01) compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidies that more frequently affect maternally derived chromosomes (90.1%; P < 0.0001). Also, the frequency of meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII) errors was established in meiotic trisomies; MI errors were observed to be more frequent (n = 102/147 [69.4%]) than MII errors (n = 45/147 [30.6%]). CONCLUSIONS: Karyomapping is a robust method that is suitable for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease and for detecting meiotic aneuploidies, including meiotic segmental aneuploidies, and provides complex information about their parental origin. Our results revealed that segmental aneuploidy more frequently affects paternal chromosomes compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidy in human IVF embryos at the blastocyst stage.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a aneuploidie $7 D000782
- 650 12
- $a chromozomální aberace $7 D002869
- 650 _2
- $a chromozomální poruchy $x epidemiologie $7 D025063
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a fertilizace in vitro $7 D005307
- 650 _2
- $a genetické testování $7 D005820
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a incidence $7 D015994
- 650 _2
- $a karyotypizace $7 D007621
- 650 12
- $a meióza $7 D008540
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a preimplantační diagnóza $x metody $7 D019836
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hornak, Miroslav $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology - Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Horak, Jakub $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Navratil, Rostislav $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tauwinklova, Gabriela $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rubes, Jiri $u Central European Institute of Technology - Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vesela, Katerina $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007348 $t Reproductive biomedicine online $x 1472-6491 $g Roč. 38, č. 3 (2019), s. 330-339
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30639160 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200525100406 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1525509 $s 1096707
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 38 $c 3 $d 330-339 $e 20181223 $i 1472-6491 $m Reproductive biomedicine online $n Reprod Biomed Online $x MED00007348
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511