• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping

D. Kubicek, M. Hornak, J. Horak, R. Navratil, G. Tauwinklova, J. Rubes, K. Vesela,

. 2019 ; 38 (3) : 330-339. [pub] 20181223

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20006651

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental aneuploidies detected by karyomapping at a blastocyst stage in human-derived IVF embryos? What is the distribution of various types of errors, including rare chromosomal abnormalities? DESIGN: The incidence of chromosomal aneuploidies was assessed in 967 trophectoderm biopsies from 180 couples who underwent 215 cycles of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease with a known causal mutation with a mean maternal age of 32.7 years. DNA from both parents and a reference sample was genotyped together with the analysed trophectoderm samples by karyomapping (single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based array). RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 31% of the analysed samples. At least one whole chromosomal aneuploidy was detected in 27.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies, whereas a segmental aneuploidy was detected in 5.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies. Our results reveal that segmental aneuploidies predominantly affect paternally derived chromosomes (70.4%; P < 0.01) compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidies that more frequently affect maternally derived chromosomes (90.1%; P < 0.0001). Also, the frequency of meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII) errors was established in meiotic trisomies; MI errors were observed to be more frequent (n = 102/147 [69.4%]) than MII errors (n = 45/147 [30.6%]). CONCLUSIONS: Karyomapping is a robust method that is suitable for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease and for detecting meiotic aneuploidies, including meiotic segmental aneuploidies, and provides complex information about their parental origin. Our results revealed that segmental aneuploidy more frequently affects paternal chromosomes compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidy in human IVF embryos at the blastocyst stage.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20006651
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200525100405.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.023 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30639160
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kubicek, David $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology - Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: dkubicek@repromeda.cz.
245    10
$a Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping / $c D. Kubicek, M. Hornak, J. Horak, R. Navratil, G. Tauwinklova, J. Rubes, K. Vesela,
520    9_
$a RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental aneuploidies detected by karyomapping at a blastocyst stage in human-derived IVF embryos? What is the distribution of various types of errors, including rare chromosomal abnormalities? DESIGN: The incidence of chromosomal aneuploidies was assessed in 967 trophectoderm biopsies from 180 couples who underwent 215 cycles of IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease with a known causal mutation with a mean maternal age of 32.7 years. DNA from both parents and a reference sample was genotyped together with the analysed trophectoderm samples by karyomapping (single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based array). RESULTS: Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 31% of the analysed samples. At least one whole chromosomal aneuploidy was detected in 27.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies, whereas a segmental aneuploidy was detected in 5.1% of the trophectoderm biopsies. Our results reveal that segmental aneuploidies predominantly affect paternally derived chromosomes (70.4%; P < 0.01) compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidies that more frequently affect maternally derived chromosomes (90.1%; P < 0.0001). Also, the frequency of meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII) errors was established in meiotic trisomies; MI errors were observed to be more frequent (n = 102/147 [69.4%]) than MII errors (n = 45/147 [30.6%]). CONCLUSIONS: Karyomapping is a robust method that is suitable for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic disease and for detecting meiotic aneuploidies, including meiotic segmental aneuploidies, and provides complex information about their parental origin. Our results revealed that segmental aneuploidy more frequently affects paternal chromosomes compared with whole chromosomal aneuploidy in human IVF embryos at the blastocyst stage.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a aneuploidie $7 D000782
650    12
$a chromozomální aberace $7 D002869
650    _2
$a chromozomální poruchy $x epidemiologie $7 D025063
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a fertilizace in vitro $7 D005307
650    _2
$a genetické testování $7 D005820
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a incidence $7 D015994
650    _2
$a karyotypizace $7 D007621
650    12
$a meióza $7 D008540
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a preimplantační diagnóza $x metody $7 D019836
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hornak, Miroslav $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology - Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Horak, Jakub $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Navratil, Rostislav $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tauwinklova, Gabriela $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rubes, Jiri $u Central European Institute of Technology - Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vesela, Katerina $u Repromeda, Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Biology Park, Studentská 812/6, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00007348 $t Reproductive biomedicine online $x 1472-6491 $g Roč. 38, č. 3 (2019), s. 330-339
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30639160 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200525100406 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1525509 $s 1096707
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 38 $c 3 $d 330-339 $e 20181223 $i 1472-6491 $m Reproductive biomedicine online $n Reprod Biomed Online $x MED00007348
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...