Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The Efficacy and Safety of Lower-Limb Plyometric Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

T. Vetrovsky, M. Steffl, P. Stastny, JJ. Tufano,

. 2019 ; 49 (1) : 113-131. [pub] -

Language English Country New Zealand

Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review

Grant support
PRIMUS/MED/17/05 Univerzita Karlova v Praze

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2008-06-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2008-06-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2008-06-01 to 1 year ago

BACKGROUND: The aging process is associated with a progressive decline of neuromuscular function, increased risk of falls and fractures, impaired functional performance, and loss of independence. Plyometric training may mitigate or even reverse such age-related deterioration; however, little research on the effects of plyometric exercises has been performed in older adults. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of plyometric training in older adults. METHODS: Papers reporting on randomized trials of plyometric training in older adults (≥ 60 years) and published up to December 2017 were sought in the PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and EMBASE databases, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. A narrative synthesis of the findings is presented in this systematic review. RESULTS: Of the 2236 identified papers, 18 were included in the review, reporting on 12 different studies with a mean PEDro score of 6.0 (range 4-7). Altogether, 289 subjects (176 females and 113 males) were included in 15 intervention groups with plyometric components (n = 8-36 per group); their mean age ranged from 58.4 to 79.4 years. The plyometric training lasted from 4 weeks to 12 months. Muscular strength, bone health, body composition, postural stability, and jump and physical performance were the most often reported outcomes. No study reported increased occurrence of injuries or other adverse events related to plyometric exercises. CONCLUSION: Plyometric training is a feasible and safe training option with potential for improving various performance, functional, and health-related outcomes in older persons.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20006741
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200521092531.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 nz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s40279-018-1018-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30387072
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a nz
100    1_
$a Vetrovsky, Tomas $u The Strength and Conditioning Laboratory, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 269/31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic. tomas.vetrovsky@gmail.com.
245    14
$a The Efficacy and Safety of Lower-Limb Plyometric Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review / $c T. Vetrovsky, M. Steffl, P. Stastny, JJ. Tufano,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The aging process is associated with a progressive decline of neuromuscular function, increased risk of falls and fractures, impaired functional performance, and loss of independence. Plyometric training may mitigate or even reverse such age-related deterioration; however, little research on the effects of plyometric exercises has been performed in older adults. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of plyometric training in older adults. METHODS: Papers reporting on randomized trials of plyometric training in older adults (≥ 60 years) and published up to December 2017 were sought in the PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and EMBASE databases, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. A narrative synthesis of the findings is presented in this systematic review. RESULTS: Of the 2236 identified papers, 18 were included in the review, reporting on 12 different studies with a mean PEDro score of 6.0 (range 4-7). Altogether, 289 subjects (176 females and 113 males) were included in 15 intervention groups with plyometric components (n = 8-36 per group); their mean age ranged from 58.4 to 79.4 years. The plyometric training lasted from 4 weeks to 12 months. Muscular strength, bone health, body composition, postural stability, and jump and physical performance were the most often reported outcomes. No study reported increased occurrence of injuries or other adverse events related to plyometric exercises. CONCLUSION: Plyometric training is a feasible and safe training option with potential for improving various performance, functional, and health-related outcomes in older persons.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a dolní končetina $x fyziologie $7 D035002
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a bezpečnost pacientů $7 D061214
650    12
$a plyometrická cvičení $7 D059385
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Steffl, Michal $u The Strength and Conditioning Laboratory, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 269/31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 269/31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tufano, James J $u The Strength and Conditioning Laboratory, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 269/31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00004425 $t Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) $x 1179-2035 $g Roč. 49, č. 1 (2019), s. 113-131
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30387072 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200521092528 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1525599 $s 1096797
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 49 $c 1 $d 113-131 $e - $i 1179-2035 $m Sports medicine $n Sports Med $x MED00004425
GRA    __
$a PRIMUS/MED/17/05 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...