Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement versus the traditional approach in the pre-hospital emergency setting: a randomized study

R. Skulec, J. Callerova, P. Vojtisek, V. Cerny,

. 2020 ; 15 (2) : 303-310. [pub] 20191107

Language English Country Italy

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2006-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest) from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago

We performed a randomized pre-hospital clinical study to compare two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion and the conventional cannulation technique in the pre-hospital emergency setting, with a specific focus on the procedural success rate and the time required to introduce PVC. This pre-hospital prospective controlled randomized clinical trial allocated patients treated by emergency medical service to undergo PVC insertion fully controlled by ultrasound (ultrasound guidance of the PVC tip until it penetrates the lumen, group A), PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound (target vein identification only, group B) or to receive PVC without any ultrasound guidance (group C). The study outcomes were monitored until the patient was admitted to the hospital. A total of 300 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first attempt (group A: 88%, group B: 94%, group C: 76%, p < 0.001) and overall success rate (A: 99%, B: 99%, C: 90%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group A, followed by group B when compared to group C. The number of attempts was significantly lower (A: 1.18 ± 0.54, B: 1.05 ± 0.22, C: 1.22 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) and the time required for the procedure shorter (A: 75.3 ± 60.6, B: 43.5 ± 26.0, C: 82.3 ± 100.9 s, p < 0.001) in group B compared to groups A and C. Both techniques of ultrasound-guided PVC placement were associated with higher success rates than the conventional method. However, PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound was superior to full ultrasound guidance in terms of time and number of cannulation attempts required.

Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care J E Purkinje University Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem Socialni pece 3316 12A 400 11 Usti Nad Labem Czech Republic Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Charles University Prague Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove University Hospital Hradec Kralove Sokolská 581 500 05 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic Faculty of Health Studies J E Purkinje University Pasteurova 3544 1 400 96 Usti Nad Labem Czech Republic Department of Research and Development Charles University Prague Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove University Hospital Hradec Kralove Sokolská 581 500 05 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic Department of Anesthesia Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax NS B3H 4R2 Canada

Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care J E Purkinje University Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem Socialni pece 3316 12A 400 11 Usti Nad Labem Czech Republic Usti and Labem Region Emergency Medical Services Sociální péče 799 7a 400 11 Usti and Labem Czech Republic

Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region Vancurova 1544 272 01 Kladno Czech Republic

Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region Vancurova 1544 272 01 Kladno Czech Republic Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care J E Purkinje University Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem Socialni pece 3316 12A 400 11 Usti Nad Labem Czech Republic Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Charles University Prague Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove University Hospital Hradec Kralove Sokolská 581 500 05 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic Faculty of Health Studies J E Purkinje University Pasteurova 3544 1 400 96 Usti Nad Labem Czech Republic

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028446
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210114153905.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s11739-019-02226-w $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31701317
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Skulec, Roman $u Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region, Vancurova 1544, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem, Socialni pece 3316/12A, 400 11, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz. Faculty of Health Studies, J.E. Purkinje University, Pasteurova 3544/1, 400 96, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz.
245    10
$a Two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement versus the traditional approach in the pre-hospital emergency setting: a randomized study / $c R. Skulec, J. Callerova, P. Vojtisek, V. Cerny,
520    9_
$a We performed a randomized pre-hospital clinical study to compare two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion and the conventional cannulation technique in the pre-hospital emergency setting, with a specific focus on the procedural success rate and the time required to introduce PVC. This pre-hospital prospective controlled randomized clinical trial allocated patients treated by emergency medical service to undergo PVC insertion fully controlled by ultrasound (ultrasound guidance of the PVC tip until it penetrates the lumen, group A), PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound (target vein identification only, group B) or to receive PVC without any ultrasound guidance (group C). The study outcomes were monitored until the patient was admitted to the hospital. A total of 300 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first attempt (group A: 88%, group B: 94%, group C: 76%, p < 0.001) and overall success rate (A: 99%, B: 99%, C: 90%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group A, followed by group B when compared to group C. The number of attempts was significantly lower (A: 1.18 ± 0.54, B: 1.05 ± 0.22, C: 1.22 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) and the time required for the procedure shorter (A: 75.3 ± 60.6, B: 43.5 ± 26.0, C: 82.3 ± 100.9 s, p < 0.001) in group B compared to groups A and C. Both techniques of ultrasound-guided PVC placement were associated with higher success rates than the conventional method. However, PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound was superior to full ultrasound guidance in terms of time and number of cannulation attempts required.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
650    _2
$a periferní katetrizace $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D002406
650    _2
$a rozdělení chí kvadrát $7 D016009
650    _2
$a urgentní zdravotnické služby $x metody $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D004632
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a venae jugulares $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D007601
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a intervenční ultrasonografie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D018084
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Callerova, Jitka $u Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region, Vancurova 1544, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vojtisek, Petr $u Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem, Socialni pece 3316/12A, 400 11, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. Usti and Labem Region Emergency Medical Services, Sociální péče 799/7a, 400 11, Usti and Labem, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cerny, Vladimir $u Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem, Socialni pece 3316/12A, 400 11, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Faculty of Health Studies, J.E. Purkinje University, Pasteurova 3544/1, 400 96, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. Department of Research and Development, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
773    0_
$w MED00188089 $t Internal and emergency medicine $x 1970-9366 $g Roč. 15, č. 2 (2020), s. 303-310
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31701317 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210114153902 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1608781 $s 1119626
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 15 $c 2 $d 303-310 $e 20191107 $i 1970-9366 $m Internal and emergency medicine $n Intern Emerg Med $x MED00188089
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...