-
Something wrong with this record ?
Two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement versus the traditional approach in the pre-hospital emergency setting: a randomized study
R. Skulec, J. Callerova, P. Vojtisek, V. Cerny,
Language English Country Italy
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-04-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Analysis of Variance MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Interventional instrumentation methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Catheterization, Peripheral instrumentation methods MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Chi-Square Distribution MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Emergency Medical Services methods standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Jugular Veins diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
We performed a randomized pre-hospital clinical study to compare two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion and the conventional cannulation technique in the pre-hospital emergency setting, with a specific focus on the procedural success rate and the time required to introduce PVC. This pre-hospital prospective controlled randomized clinical trial allocated patients treated by emergency medical service to undergo PVC insertion fully controlled by ultrasound (ultrasound guidance of the PVC tip until it penetrates the lumen, group A), PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound (target vein identification only, group B) or to receive PVC without any ultrasound guidance (group C). The study outcomes were monitored until the patient was admitted to the hospital. A total of 300 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first attempt (group A: 88%, group B: 94%, group C: 76%, p < 0.001) and overall success rate (A: 99%, B: 99%, C: 90%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group A, followed by group B when compared to group C. The number of attempts was significantly lower (A: 1.18 ± 0.54, B: 1.05 ± 0.22, C: 1.22 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) and the time required for the procedure shorter (A: 75.3 ± 60.6, B: 43.5 ± 26.0, C: 82.3 ± 100.9 s, p < 0.001) in group B compared to groups A and C. Both techniques of ultrasound-guided PVC placement were associated with higher success rates than the conventional method. However, PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound was superior to full ultrasound guidance in terms of time and number of cannulation attempts required.
Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region Vancurova 1544 272 01 Kladno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028446
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114153905.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s11739-019-02226-w $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31701317
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Skulec, Roman $u Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region, Vancurova 1544, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem, Socialni pece 3316/12A, 400 11, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz. Faculty of Health Studies, J.E. Purkinje University, Pasteurova 3544/1, 400 96, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. skulec@email.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement versus the traditional approach in the pre-hospital emergency setting: a randomized study / $c R. Skulec, J. Callerova, P. Vojtisek, V. Cerny,
- 520 9_
- $a We performed a randomized pre-hospital clinical study to compare two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion and the conventional cannulation technique in the pre-hospital emergency setting, with a specific focus on the procedural success rate and the time required to introduce PVC. This pre-hospital prospective controlled randomized clinical trial allocated patients treated by emergency medical service to undergo PVC insertion fully controlled by ultrasound (ultrasound guidance of the PVC tip until it penetrates the lumen, group A), PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound (target vein identification only, group B) or to receive PVC without any ultrasound guidance (group C). The study outcomes were monitored until the patient was admitted to the hospital. A total of 300 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first attempt (group A: 88%, group B: 94%, group C: 76%, p < 0.001) and overall success rate (A: 99%, B: 99%, C: 90%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group A, followed by group B when compared to group C. The number of attempts was significantly lower (A: 1.18 ± 0.54, B: 1.05 ± 0.22, C: 1.22 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) and the time required for the procedure shorter (A: 75.3 ± 60.6, B: 43.5 ± 26.0, C: 82.3 ± 100.9 s, p < 0.001) in group B compared to groups A and C. Both techniques of ultrasound-guided PVC placement were associated with higher success rates than the conventional method. However, PVC insertion partially controlled by ultrasound was superior to full ultrasound guidance in terms of time and number of cannulation attempts required.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a periferní katetrizace $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D002406
- 650 _2
- $a rozdělení chí kvadrát $7 D016009
- 650 _2
- $a urgentní zdravotnické služby $x metody $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D004632
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a venae jugulares $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D007601
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a intervenční ultrasonografie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D018084
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Callerova, Jitka $u Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region, Vancurova 1544, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vojtisek, Petr $u Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem, Socialni pece 3316/12A, 400 11, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. Usti and Labem Region Emergency Medical Services, Sociální péče 799/7a, 400 11, Usti and Labem, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cerny, Vladimir $u Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital Usti Nad Labem, Socialni pece 3316/12A, 400 11, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Faculty of Health Studies, J.E. Purkinje University, Pasteurova 3544/1, 400 96, Usti Nad Labem, Czech Republic. Department of Research and Development, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188089 $t Internal and emergency medicine $x 1970-9366 $g Roč. 15, č. 2 (2020), s. 303-310
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31701317 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114153902 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608781 $s 1119626
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 15 $c 2 $d 303-310 $e 20191107 $i 1970-9366 $m Internal and emergency medicine $n Intern Emerg Med $x MED00188089
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105