-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Transferability of PCR-based diagnostic protocols: An international collaborative case study assessing protocols targeting the quarantine pine pathogen Fusarium circinatum
R. Ioos, F. Aloi, B. Piškur, C. Guinet, M. Mullett, M. Berbegal, H. Bragança, SO. Cacciola, F. Oskay, C. Cornejo, K. Adamson, C. Douanla-Meli, A. Kačergius, P. Martínez-Álvarez, JA. Nowakowska, N. Luchi, AM. Vettraino, R. Ahumada, M. Pasquali, G....
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01 do 2019-12-31
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01 do 2019-12-31
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2011-12-01
Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
od 2011-12-01
- MeSH
- borovice mikrobiologie MeSH
- DNA fungální analýza MeSH
- DNA rostlinná MeSH
- falešně pozitivní reakce MeSH
- Fusarium genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
- mezinárodní spolupráce MeSH
- molekulární biologie normy MeSH
- nemoci rostlin mikrobiologie MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Fusarium circinatum is a harmful pathogenic fungus mostly attacking Pinus species and also Pseudotsuga menziesii, causing cankers in trees of all ages, damping-off in seedlings, and mortality in cuttings and mother plants for clonal production. This fungus is listed as a quarantine pest in several parts of the world and the trade of potentially contaminated pine material such as cuttings, seedlings or seeds is restricted in order to prevent its spread to disease-free areas. Inspection of plant material often relies on DNA testing and several conventional or real-time PCR based tests targeting F. circinatum are available in the literature. In this work, an international collaborative study joined 23 partners to assess the transferability and the performance of nine molecular protocols, using a wide panel of DNA from 71 representative strains of F. circinatum and related Fusarium species. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the nine protocols all reached values >80%, and the diagnostic specificity was the only parameter differing significantly between protocols. The rates of false positives and of false negatives were computed and only the false positive rates differed significantly, ranging from 3.0% to 17.3%. The difference between protocols for some of the performance values were mainly due to cross-reactions with DNA from non-target species, which were either not tested or documented in the original articles. Considering that participating laboratories were free to use their own reagents and equipment, this study demonstrated that the diagnostic protocols for F. circinatum were not easily transferable to end-users. More generally, our results suggest that the use of protocols using conventional or real-time PCR outside their initial development and validation conditions should require careful characterization of the performance data prior to use under modified conditions (i.e. reagents and equipment). Suggestions to improve the transfer are proposed.
Bioforest S A Camino a Coronel km 15S N 4030000 Concepción Chile
Çankırı Karatekin University Faculty of Forestry 18200 Çankırı Turkey
Departamento de Biologia CESAM Universidade de Aveiro 3810 193 Aveiro Portugal
Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering Estonian University of Life Sciences 51006 Tartu Estonia
Slovenian Forestry Institute Department of Forest Protection Večna pot 2 SI 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028898
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114155311.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41598-019-44672-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31160683
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Ioos, Renaud $u ANSES Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Unité de Mycologie, Domaine de Pixérécourt Bât. E, 54220, Malzéville, France. renaud.ioos@anses.fr.
- 245 10
- $a Transferability of PCR-based diagnostic protocols: An international collaborative case study assessing protocols targeting the quarantine pine pathogen Fusarium circinatum / $c R. Ioos, F. Aloi, B. Piškur, C. Guinet, M. Mullett, M. Berbegal, H. Bragança, SO. Cacciola, F. Oskay, C. Cornejo, K. Adamson, C. Douanla-Meli, A. Kačergius, P. Martínez-Álvarez, JA. Nowakowska, N. Luchi, AM. Vettraino, R. Ahumada, M. Pasquali, G. Fourie, L. Kanetis, A. Alves, L. Ghelardini, M. Dvořák, A. Sanz-Ros, JJ. Diez, J. Baskarathevan, J. Aguayo,
- 520 9_
- $a Fusarium circinatum is a harmful pathogenic fungus mostly attacking Pinus species and also Pseudotsuga menziesii, causing cankers in trees of all ages, damping-off in seedlings, and mortality in cuttings and mother plants for clonal production. This fungus is listed as a quarantine pest in several parts of the world and the trade of potentially contaminated pine material such as cuttings, seedlings or seeds is restricted in order to prevent its spread to disease-free areas. Inspection of plant material often relies on DNA testing and several conventional or real-time PCR based tests targeting F. circinatum are available in the literature. In this work, an international collaborative study joined 23 partners to assess the transferability and the performance of nine molecular protocols, using a wide panel of DNA from 71 representative strains of F. circinatum and related Fusarium species. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the nine protocols all reached values >80%, and the diagnostic specificity was the only parameter differing significantly between protocols. The rates of false positives and of false negatives were computed and only the false positive rates differed significantly, ranging from 3.0% to 17.3%. The difference between protocols for some of the performance values were mainly due to cross-reactions with DNA from non-target species, which were either not tested or documented in the original articles. Considering that participating laboratories were free to use their own reagents and equipment, this study demonstrated that the diagnostic protocols for F. circinatum were not easily transferable to end-users. More generally, our results suggest that the use of protocols using conventional or real-time PCR outside their initial development and validation conditions should require careful characterization of the performance data prior to use under modified conditions (i.e. reagents and equipment). Suggestions to improve the transfer are proposed.
- 650 _2
- $a DNA fungální $x analýza $7 D004271
- 650 _2
- $a DNA rostlinná $7 D018744
- 650 _2
- $a falešně pozitivní reakce $7 D005189
- 650 _2
- $a Fusarium $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D005670
- 650 _2
- $a mezinárodní spolupráce $7 D007391
- 650 _2
- $a molekulární biologie $x normy $7 D008967
- 650 _2
- $a borovice $x mikrobiologie $7 D028223
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci rostlin $x mikrobiologie $7 D010935
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $7 D016133
- 650 _2
- $a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D060888
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Aloi, Francesco $u Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 100, Catania, 95123, Italy. Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128, Palermo, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Piškur, Barbara $u Slovenian Forestry Institute, Department of Forest Protection, Večna pot 2, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
- 700 1_
- $a Guinet, Cécile $u ANSES Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Unité de Mycologie, Domaine de Pixérécourt Bât. E, 54220, Malzéville, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Mullett, Martin $u Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH, United Kingdom. Phytophthora Research Center, Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Berbegal, Mónica $u Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Bragança, Helena $u Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária I.P. (INIAV I.P.), Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159, Oeiras, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Cacciola, Santa Olga $u Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 100, Catania, 95123, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Oskay, Funda $u Çankırı Karatekin University, Faculty of Forestry, 18200, Çankırı, Turkey.
- 700 1_
- $a Cornejo, Carolina $u Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zuercherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Adamson, Kalev $u Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006, Tartu, Estonia.
- 700 1_
- $a Douanla-Meli, Clovis $u Julius Kühn-Institut, Institute for National and International Plant Health, Messeweg 11-12, 38104, Braunschweig, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Kačergius, Audrius $u Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Vokė Branch, Zalioji Sq. 2, 02232, Vilnius, Lithuania.
- 700 1_
- $a Martínez-Álvarez, Pablo $u Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid - INIA/Department of Vegetal Production and Forest Resources, University of Valladolid, 47011, Palencia, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Nowakowska, Justyna Anna $u Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Wóycickiego 1/3 Street, 01-938, Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Luchi, Nicola $u Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection - National Research Council (IPSP-CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Vettraino, Anna Maria $u Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, via S. Camillo de Lellis, snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Ahumada, Rodrigo $u Bioforest S.A. Camino a Coronel km 15S/N, 4030000, Concepción, Chile.
- 700 1_
- $a Pasquali, Matias $u Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences, University of Milan, via Celoria 2, I-20133, Milano, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Fourie, Gerda $u Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, 0028 Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa.
- 700 1_
- $a Kanetis, Loukas $u Department of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology, and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus.
- 700 1_
- $a Alves, Artur $u Departamento de Biologia, CESAM, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Ghelardini, Luisa $u Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell'Ambiente (DISPAA), University of Florence, 50144, Florence, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Dvořák, Miloň $u Phytophthora Research Center, Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sanz-Ros, Antonio $u Forest Health Center of Calabazanos, Regional Government of Castilla y León, JCyL, Poligono Industrial de Villamuriel, S/N, 30190, Villamuriel de Cerrato, Palencia, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Diez, Julio J $u Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid - INIA/Department of Vegetal Production and Forest Resources, University of Valladolid, 47011, Palencia, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Baskarathevan, Jeyaseelan $u Plant Health & Environment Laboratory, Diagnostic and Surveillance Services, Biosecurity New Zealand, Ministry for Primary Industries, PO Box 2095, Auckland, 1140, New Zealand.
- 700 1_
- $a Aguayo, Jaime $u ANSES Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Unité de Mycologie, Domaine de Pixérécourt Bât. E, 54220, Malzéville, France.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 9, č. 1 (2019), s. 8195
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31160683 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114155309 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1609233 $s 1120078
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 9 $c 1 $d 8195 $e 20190603 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105