-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry and discrepancy between fraction flow reserve and instantaneous wave free ratio
S. Jerabek, D. Zemanek, J. Pudil, K. Bayerova, A. Kral, K. Kopriva, Y. Kawase, H. Omori, T. Tanigaki, Z. Chen, A. Vodzinska, M. Branny, H. Matsuo, M. Mates, M. Sonka, T. Kovarnik
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie
Grantová podpora
NV16-28525A
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
- MeSH
- cévní endotel patofyziologie MeSH
- cévní rezistence MeSH
- frakční průtoková rezerva myokardu * MeSH
- koronární stenóza * diagnóza patofyziologie MeSH
- laser doppler flowmetrie * přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- manometrie přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- mikrocirkulace fyziologie MeSH
- navrhování softwaru * MeSH
- počítačové zpracování obrazu MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- software MeSH
- zobrazování myokardiální perfuze metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
Background: We tested whether the level of endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry, and expressed as reactive hyperemia index (RHI), is related to occurrences of a discrepancy between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03033810).Methods: We examined patients with coronary stenosis in the range of 40-70%, assessed by both FFR and iFR (system Philips-Volcano) for stable angina. We included consecutive patients with FFR and iFR in one native coronary artery, and who had had no previous intervention.Results: We included 138 patients. Out of those, 24 patients (17.4%) had a negative FFR (with an FFR value >0.8) and positive iFR (with a iFR value ≤0.89) - designated the FFRn/iFRp discrepancy group, and 22 patients (15.9%) had a positive FFR (≤0.8) and negative iFR (>0.89) - designated the FFRp/iFRn discrepancy. RHI was higher in the discrepancy groups compared the group without discrepancy (1.73 ± 0.79 vs. 1.48 ± 0.50, p = 0.025). However, this finding was not confirmed in multivariant logistic regression analyses. Patients with any type of discrepancy differed from the agreement group by having a higher occurrence of diabetes mellitus [9 patients (21.4%) vs. 36 patients (39.6%), p = 0.029], active smoking (23 patients or 54.8% vs. 26 patients or 28.6%, p = 0.003) and lower use of calcium channel blockers (9 patients, 21.4%, vs. 43 patients, 46.7%, p = 0.004).Conclusion: The presence of endothelial dysfunction can be associated with a discrepancy in FFR/iFR. However, RHI correlated with risk factors of atherosclerosis, not with FFR or iFR.
Cardiology Department Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Cardiology Department Trinec Podlesi Hospital Trinec Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020274
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101907.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/00015385.2019.1586089 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30945607
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Jerabek, Stepan $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry and discrepancy between fraction flow reserve and instantaneous wave free ratio / $c S. Jerabek, D. Zemanek, J. Pudil, K. Bayerova, A. Kral, K. Kopriva, Y. Kawase, H. Omori, T. Tanigaki, Z. Chen, A. Vodzinska, M. Branny, H. Matsuo, M. Mates, M. Sonka, T. Kovarnik
- 520 9_
- $a Background: We tested whether the level of endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital tonometry, and expressed as reactive hyperemia index (RHI), is related to occurrences of a discrepancy between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03033810).Methods: We examined patients with coronary stenosis in the range of 40-70%, assessed by both FFR and iFR (system Philips-Volcano) for stable angina. We included consecutive patients with FFR and iFR in one native coronary artery, and who had had no previous intervention.Results: We included 138 patients. Out of those, 24 patients (17.4%) had a negative FFR (with an FFR value >0.8) and positive iFR (with a iFR value ≤0.89) - designated the FFRn/iFRp discrepancy group, and 22 patients (15.9%) had a positive FFR (≤0.8) and negative iFR (>0.89) - designated the FFRp/iFRn discrepancy. RHI was higher in the discrepancy groups compared the group without discrepancy (1.73 ± 0.79 vs. 1.48 ± 0.50, p = 0.025). However, this finding was not confirmed in multivariant logistic regression analyses. Patients with any type of discrepancy differed from the agreement group by having a higher occurrence of diabetes mellitus [9 patients (21.4%) vs. 36 patients (39.6%), p = 0.029], active smoking (23 patients or 54.8% vs. 26 patients or 28.6%, p = 0.003) and lower use of calcium channel blockers (9 patients, 21.4%, vs. 43 patients, 46.7%, p = 0.004).Conclusion: The presence of endothelial dysfunction can be associated with a discrepancy in FFR/iFR. However, RHI correlated with risk factors of atherosclerosis, not with FFR or iFR.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a koronární stenóza $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D023921
- 650 _2
- $a cévní endotel $x patofyziologie $7 D004730
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a frakční průtoková rezerva myokardu $7 D053805
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a počítačové zpracování obrazu $7 D007091
- 650 12
- $a laser doppler flowmetrie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D017078
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a manometrie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D008365
- 650 _2
- $a mikrocirkulace $x fyziologie $7 D008833
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování myokardiální perfuze $x metody $7 D055414
- 650 _2
- $a software $7 D012984
- 650 12
- $a navrhování softwaru $7 D012985
- 650 _2
- $a cévní rezistence $7 D014655
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Zemanek, David $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pudil, Jan $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bayerova, Kristyna $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kral, Ales $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kopriva, Karel $u Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kawase, Yoshiaki $u Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Omori, Hiroyuki $u Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Tanigaki, Toru $u Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Zhi $u Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering and Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Vodzinska, Alexandra $u Cardiology Department, Trinec Podlesi Hospital, Trinec, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Branny, Marian $u Cardiology Department, Trinec Podlesi Hospital, Trinec, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Matsuo, Hitoshi $u Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Mates, Martin $u Cardiology Department, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sonka, Milan $u Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering and Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Kovarnik, Tomas $u 2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008997 $t Acta cardiologica $x 1784-973X $g Roč. 75, č. 4 (2020), s. 323-328
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30945607 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101907 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690953 $s 1140720
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 75 $c 4 $d 323-328 $e 20190404 $i 1784-973X $m Acta cardiologica $n Acta Cardiol $x MED00008997
- GRA __
- $a NV16-28525A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728