-
Something wrong with this record ?
Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy versus biopsies in the diagnostics of oesophageal and gastric lesions: A prospective, pathologist-blinded study
M. Kollar, J. Krajciova, L. Prefertusova, E. Sticova, J. Maluskova, Z. Vackova, J. Martinek
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NV16-27648A
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
from 2013
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
- MeSH
- Adenocarcinoma diagnosis pathology MeSH
- Biopsy statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal instrumentation methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Microscopy, Confocal instrumentation methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Lasers MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Esophageal Neoplasms diagnosis pathology MeSH
- Stomach Neoplasms diagnosis pathology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Esophageal Mucosa diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell diagnosis pathology MeSH
- Gastric Mucosa diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides real-time microscopic visualisation. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of pCLE with standard biopsies in patients with visible oesophageal or gastric lesions. METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, pathologist-blinded study. Patients underwent high-resolution endoscopy, and lesions were examined by pCLE followed by standard biopsies. A definitive diagnosis was determined from resection specimen. Main outcomes were overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: We examined 74 lesions in 67 patients. Definitive diagnoses revealed 34 malignant and 40 non-malignant lesions. pCLE diagnosis was correct in 89.2% (66/74), while diagnosis based on biopsy was correct in 85% (57/67; p = 0.6). The overall diagnostic accuracy of biopsies was 85% (76-94%) and that of pCLE was 89% (79-96%). pCLE correctly diagnosed malignant lesions, comprising oesophageal adenocarcinoma, oesophageal squamous-cell cancer or gastric adenocarcinoma, in 88.2% (30/34) of cases, while biopsy was correctly diagnosed in 75.9% (22/29; p = 0.3). Sensitivity and specificity to diagnose a malignant lesion were 75.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56-89%) and 100% (95% CI 90-100%) for biopsies and 88.2% (95% CI 72-97%) and 92% (95% CI 79-98%) for pCLE. No differences between biopsies and pCLE were found with regard to sensitivity, specificity to diagnose dysplastic and benign lesions (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: pCLE provides satisfactory diagnostic accuracy comparable with standard biopsies in patients with oesophageal or gastric lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT0292049).
Department of Hepatogastroenterology IKEM Prague Czech Republic
Department of Pathology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Physiology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020614
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830102237.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/2050640620904865 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32213027
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kollar, Marek $u Department of Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy versus biopsies in the diagnostics of oesophageal and gastric lesions: A prospective, pathologist-blinded study / $c M. Kollar, J. Krajciova, L. Prefertusova, E. Sticova, J. Maluskova, Z. Vackova, J. Martinek
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND AIM: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides real-time microscopic visualisation. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of pCLE with standard biopsies in patients with visible oesophageal or gastric lesions. METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, pathologist-blinded study. Patients underwent high-resolution endoscopy, and lesions were examined by pCLE followed by standard biopsies. A definitive diagnosis was determined from resection specimen. Main outcomes were overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: We examined 74 lesions in 67 patients. Definitive diagnoses revealed 34 malignant and 40 non-malignant lesions. pCLE diagnosis was correct in 89.2% (66/74), while diagnosis based on biopsy was correct in 85% (57/67; p = 0.6). The overall diagnostic accuracy of biopsies was 85% (76-94%) and that of pCLE was 89% (79-96%). pCLE correctly diagnosed malignant lesions, comprising oesophageal adenocarcinoma, oesophageal squamous-cell cancer or gastric adenocarcinoma, in 88.2% (30/34) of cases, while biopsy was correctly diagnosed in 75.9% (22/29; p = 0.3). Sensitivity and specificity to diagnose a malignant lesion were 75.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56-89%) and 100% (95% CI 90-100%) for biopsies and 88.2% (95% CI 72-97%) and 92% (95% CI 79-98%) for pCLE. No differences between biopsies and pCLE were found with regard to sensitivity, specificity to diagnose dysplastic and benign lesions (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: pCLE provides satisfactory diagnostic accuracy comparable with standard biopsies in patients with oesophageal or gastric lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT0292049).
- 650 _2
- $a adenokarcinom $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D000230
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D001706
- 650 _2
- $a spinocelulární karcinom $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D002294
- 650 _2
- $a gastrointestinální endoskopie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016099
- 650 _2
- $a sliznice jícnu $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D000071041
- 650 _2
- $a nádory jícnu $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D004938
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a žaludeční sliznice $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D005753
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lasery $7 D007834
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a konfokální mikroskopie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D018613
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a nádory žaludku $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D013274
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Krajciova, Jana $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Prefertusova, Lucia $u Department of Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sticova, Eva $u Department of Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Maluskova, Jana $u Department of Pathology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vackova, Zuzana $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Martinek, Jan $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188834 $t United European gastroenterology journal $x 2050-6414 $g Roč. 8, č. 4 (2020), s. 436-443
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32213027 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830102237 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1691233 $s 1141060
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 8 $c 4 $d 436-443 $e 20200128 $i 2050-6414 $m United European gastroenterology journal $n United European Gastroenterol J $x MED00188834
- GRA __
- $a NV16-27648A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728