-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The role of new technologies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Application of next-generation sequencing in myelofibrosis
J. Navrátilová, M. Palová, T. Szotkowski, A. Hluší, B. Katrincsáková, T. Papajík, K. Indrák
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
IGA-LF-UP-2020_002
Palacky University Olomouc
PubMed
33734589
DOI
10.1111/ijlh.13504
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dioxygenasy genetika MeSH
- DNA vazebné proteiny genetika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fosfoproteiny genetika MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- primární myelofibróza genetika MeSH
- represorové proteiny genetika MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sestřihové faktory genetika MeSH
- vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Driver mutations in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are well known. In the past, whole-genome sequencing identified nondriver mutations in other genes, potentially contributing to evolution of malignant clones. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing was used to assess the presence of any mutations in 14 candidate genes at the point of diagnosis and the resultant impact on the clinical course of the disease. RESULTS: The study analysed 63 patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Nondriver mutations were detected in 44% of them. The most frequently affected genes were ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (11%) and SF3B1 (6%). The frequency of such mutations was highest in primary MF (59%) and lowest in the prefibrotic phase of primary MF (21%). Patients with prognostically unfavourable sequence variants in genes had significantly worse overall survival (53 vs 71 months; HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.17-6.56; P = .017). CONCLUSION: In our study, multivariate analysis proved DIPSS to be the only significant factor to predict patient survival. DIPSS contains all of the important clinical and laboratory factors except genetic changes. Stratification of patients according to DIPSS is still beneficial although there are newer and improved scoring systems like GIPSS or MIPSS70. Assessing subclonal mutations in candidate genes during diagnosis may aid in the identification of high-risk MF patients and is therefore relevant for making a prediction for overall survival more accurate.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003585
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220713140527.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/ijlh.13504 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33734589
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kudová, Jana, $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1988- $7 mub2016926484
- 245 14
- $a The role of new technologies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Application of next-generation sequencing in myelofibrosis / $c J. Navrátilová, M. Palová, T. Szotkowski, A. Hluší, B. Katrincsáková, T. Papajík, K. Indrák
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Driver mutations in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are well known. In the past, whole-genome sequencing identified nondriver mutations in other genes, potentially contributing to evolution of malignant clones. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing was used to assess the presence of any mutations in 14 candidate genes at the point of diagnosis and the resultant impact on the clinical course of the disease. RESULTS: The study analysed 63 patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Nondriver mutations were detected in 44% of them. The most frequently affected genes were ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (11%) and SF3B1 (6%). The frequency of such mutations was highest in primary MF (59%) and lowest in the prefibrotic phase of primary MF (21%). Patients with prognostically unfavourable sequence variants in genes had significantly worse overall survival (53 vs 71 months; HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.17-6.56; P = .017). CONCLUSION: In our study, multivariate analysis proved DIPSS to be the only significant factor to predict patient survival. DIPSS contains all of the important clinical and laboratory factors except genetic changes. Stratification of patients according to DIPSS is still beneficial although there are newer and improved scoring systems like GIPSS or MIPSS70. Assessing subclonal mutations in candidate genes during diagnosis may aid in the identification of high-risk MF patients and is therefore relevant for making a prediction for overall survival more accurate.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a DNA vazebné proteiny $x genetika $7 D004268
- 650 _2
- $a dioxygenasy $x genetika $7 D049308
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $x metody $7 D059014
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a mutace $7 D009154
- 650 _2
- $a fosfoproteiny $x genetika $7 D010750
- 650 _2
- $a primární myelofibróza $x genetika $7 D055728
- 650 _2
- $a sestřihové faktory $x genetika $7 D000072260
- 650 _2
- $a represorové proteiny $x genetika $7 D012097
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Palová, Miroslava $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Szotkowski, Tomáš $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hluší, Antonín $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Katrincsáková, Beáta $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Papajík, Tomáš $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Indrák, Karel $u Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00153487 $t International journal of laboratory hematology $x 1751-553X $g Roč. 43, č. 5 (2021), s. 1070-1077
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33734589 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220713140522 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751139 $s 1154734
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 43 $c 5 $d 1070-1077 $e 20210318 $i 1751-553X $m International journal of laboratory hematology $n Int J Lab Hematol $x MED00153487
- GRA __
- $a IGA-LF-UP-2020_002 $p Palacky University Olomouc
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113