• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

MRI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Measure Infarct Volume: Assessment of Manual Segmentation Variability

P. Cimflova, J. Kral, O. Volny, M. Horn, P. Ojha, M. Cabal, L. Kasickova, J. Havelka, T. Jonszta, M. Bar, W. Qiu

. 2021 ; 31 (3) : 541-550. [pub] 20210330

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21025800

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Manual segmentation of infarct volume on follow-up MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI-DWI) is considered the gold standard but is prone to rater variability. We assess the variability of manual segmentations of MRI-DWI infarct volume. METHODS: Consecutive patients (May 2018 to May 2019) with the anterior circulation stroke and endovascularly treated were enrolled. All patients underwent 24- to 32-hour follow-up MRI. Three users manually segmented DWI infarct volumes slice by slice twice. The reference standard of DWI infarct volume was generated by the STAPLE algorithm. Intra- and interrater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by comparing manual segmentations with the reference standard. Spatial measurements were evaluated using metrics of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Volumetric measurements were compared using the lesion volume. RESULTS: The dataset consisted of 44 patients, mean (SD) age was 70.1 years (±10.3), 43% were women, and median baseline NIHSS score was 16. Among three users, the mean DSC for MRI-DWI infarct volume segmentations ranged from 80.6% ± 11.7% to 88.6% ± 7.5%, and the mean absolute volume difference was 2.8 ± 6.8 to 13.0 ± 14.0 ml. Interrater ICC among the users for DSC and infarct volume was .86 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: .78-.91) and .997 (95% CI: .995-.998). Intrarater ICC for the three users was .83 (95% CI: .69-.93), .84 (95% CI: .72-.91), and .80 (95% CI: .64-.89) for DSC, and .99 (95% CI: .987-.996), .991 (95% CI: .983-.995), and .996 (95% CI: .993-.998) for infarct volume. CONCLUSIONS: Manual segmentation of infarct volume on follow-up MRI-DWI shows excellent agreement and good spatial overlap with the reference standard, suggesting its usefulness for measuring infarct volume on 24- to 32-hour MRI-DWI.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025800
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133506.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jon.12850 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33783929
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Cimflova, Petra $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u Department of Medical Imaging, St. Anne´s University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, Stroke Research Program, St. Anne´s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
245    10
$a MRI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Measure Infarct Volume: Assessment of Manual Segmentation Variability / $c P. Cimflova, J. Kral, O. Volny, M. Horn, P. Ojha, M. Cabal, L. Kasickova, J. Havelka, T. Jonszta, M. Bar, W. Qiu
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Manual segmentation of infarct volume on follow-up MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI-DWI) is considered the gold standard but is prone to rater variability. We assess the variability of manual segmentations of MRI-DWI infarct volume. METHODS: Consecutive patients (May 2018 to May 2019) with the anterior circulation stroke and endovascularly treated were enrolled. All patients underwent 24- to 32-hour follow-up MRI. Three users manually segmented DWI infarct volumes slice by slice twice. The reference standard of DWI infarct volume was generated by the STAPLE algorithm. Intra- and interrater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by comparing manual segmentations with the reference standard. Spatial measurements were evaluated using metrics of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Volumetric measurements were compared using the lesion volume. RESULTS: The dataset consisted of 44 patients, mean (SD) age was 70.1 years (±10.3), 43% were women, and median baseline NIHSS score was 16. Among three users, the mean DSC for MRI-DWI infarct volume segmentations ranged from 80.6% ± 11.7% to 88.6% ± 7.5%, and the mean absolute volume difference was 2.8 ± 6.8 to 13.0 ± 14.0 ml. Interrater ICC among the users for DSC and infarct volume was .86 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: .78-.91) and .997 (95% CI: .995-.998). Intrarater ICC for the three users was .83 (95% CI: .69-.93), .84 (95% CI: .72-.91), and .80 (95% CI: .64-.89) for DSC, and .99 (95% CI: .987-.996), .991 (95% CI: .983-.995), and .996 (95% CI: .993-.998) for infarct volume. CONCLUSIONS: Manual segmentation of infarct volume on follow-up MRI-DWI shows excellent agreement and good spatial overlap with the reference standard, suggesting its usefulness for measuring infarct volume on 24- to 32-hour MRI-DWI.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a mozkový infarkt $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x terapie $7 D020520
650    _2
$a difuzní magnetická rezonance $x metody $7 D038524
650    _2
$a endovaskulární výkony $x metody $7 D057510
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kral, Jiri $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Volny, Ondrej $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u International Clinical Research Center, Stroke Research Program, St. Anne´s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Horn, MacKenzie $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
700    1_
$a Ojha, Piyush $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
700    1_
$a Cabal, Martin $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kasickova, Linda $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Havelka, Jaroslav $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jonszta, Tomas $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bar, Michal $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Qiu, Wu $u Departments of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada $u Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
773    0_
$w MED00002833 $t Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging $x 1552-6569 $g Roč. 31, č. 3 (2021), s. 541-550
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33783929 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133512 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714721 $s 1146307
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 31 $c 3 $d 541-550 $e 20210330 $i 1552-6569 $m Journal of neuroimaging $n J Neuroimaging $x MED00002833
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace