-
Something wrong with this record ?
Rapid screening of depression and anxiety in cancer patients: Interview validation of emotion thermometers
K. Licková, A. Čoček, M. Ambruš, R. Soumarová, J. Vránová, P. Klézl, AJ. Mitchell, J. Raudenská, A. Javůrková
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Early Detection of Cancer MeSH
- Depression diagnosis epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Quality of Life * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasms * complications MeSH
- Mass Screening MeSH
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales MeSH
- Psychometrics MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Thermometers MeSH
- Anxiety diagnosis epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Anxiety Disorders diagnosis epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the degree of depression and anxiety in cancer patients using the Emotion Thermometers (ET) and confirming their clinical usefulness compared to the gold standard interview, as well as determining optimal cut-off values for the appropriate identification of cancer patients' distress. METHODS: We included 238 cancer patients and we used ET (Emotion Thermometers) to screen depression and anxiety and the Beck depression inventory for adults (BDI-II), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) was used as the criterial validity standard. RESULTS: The prevalence of anxiety on the M.I.N.I. was 24% and depression was 11%. The optimal value for diagnosis of depression from ET (Dep ET) appears to be > 4.5 (AUC 0.928) against M.I.N.I. Optimal score for anxiety from ET (AnxT ET) compared to GAD according to M.I.N.I. we determined the value of 3.5 (AUC 0.899). To determine the cut off score for distress using from ET (DT), we compared against GAD-7 and BDI-II RS (raw total score) and the most optimal was 4.5 (AUC 0.953). For analysis of the cut off score for quality of life (QoL) against the total sums of all parts of the ET, the value of 14.5 (AUC 0.892) forms the cut off between the negative and the positive clinical finding. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study support the use of ET as a rapid screening tool for the detection of depression, anxiety and distress in cancer patients.
Department of Clinical Psychology University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czechia
Department of Ear Nose and Throat Thomayer Hospital Prague Czechia
Department of Psycho oncology University of Leicester Leicester LE1 5WW UK
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003271
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127150513.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102827 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34560569
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Licková, K $u Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Rapid screening of depression and anxiety in cancer patients: Interview validation of emotion thermometers / $c K. Licková, A. Čoček, M. Ambruš, R. Soumarová, J. Vránová, P. Klézl, AJ. Mitchell, J. Raudenská, A. Javůrková
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the degree of depression and anxiety in cancer patients using the Emotion Thermometers (ET) and confirming their clinical usefulness compared to the gold standard interview, as well as determining optimal cut-off values for the appropriate identification of cancer patients' distress. METHODS: We included 238 cancer patients and we used ET (Emotion Thermometers) to screen depression and anxiety and the Beck depression inventory for adults (BDI-II), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) was used as the criterial validity standard. RESULTS: The prevalence of anxiety on the M.I.N.I. was 24% and depression was 11%. The optimal value for diagnosis of depression from ET (Dep ET) appears to be > 4.5 (AUC 0.928) against M.I.N.I. Optimal score for anxiety from ET (AnxT ET) compared to GAD according to M.I.N.I. we determined the value of 3.5 (AUC 0.899). To determine the cut off score for distress using from ET (DT), we compared against GAD-7 and BDI-II RS (raw total score) and the most optimal was 4.5 (AUC 0.953). For analysis of the cut off score for quality of life (QoL) against the total sums of all parts of the ET, the value of 14.5 (AUC 0.892) forms the cut off between the negative and the positive clinical finding. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study support the use of ET as a rapid screening tool for the detection of depression, anxiety and distress in cancer patients.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a úzkost $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D001007
- 650 _2
- $a úzkostné poruchy $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D001008
- 650 _2
- $a deprese $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D003863
- 650 _2
- $a časná detekce nádoru $7 D055088
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a plošný screening $7 D008403
- 650 12
- $a nádory $x komplikace $7 D009369
- 650 _2
- $a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 12
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a teploměry $7 D013821
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Čoček, A $u Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Ambruš, M $u Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Soumarová, R $u Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Vránová, J $u Institute of Medical Biophysics and Medical Informatics, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Klézl, P $u Department of Urology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Mitchell, A J $u Department of Psycho-oncology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
- 700 1_
- $a Raudenská, J $u Department of Nursing, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Javůrková, A $u Department of Nursing, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia; Department of Clinical Psychology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia. Electronic address: alena.javurkova@fnkv.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166561 $t Asian journal of psychiatry $x 1876-2026 $g Roč. 65, č. - (2021), s. 102827
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34560569 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127150509 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1750895 $s 1154420
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 65 $c - $d 102827 $e 20210910 $i 1876-2026 $m Asian journal of psychiatry $n Asian J Psychiatr $x MED00166561
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113