• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be

P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Salzer, J. Malm, J. Zizka

. 2021 ; 42 (7) : 1201-1207. [pub] 20210422

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22004104

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Systematic analysis of angulation-related variability of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus imaging biomarkers has not been published yet. Our aim was to evaluate the variability of these radiologic biomarkers with respect to imaging plane angulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty subjects (35 with clinically confirmed idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and 45 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were prospectively enrolled in a 3T brain MR imaging study. Two independent readers assessed 12 radiologic idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus biomarkers on sections aligned parallel or perpendicular to the bicallosal, bicommissural, hypophysis-fastigium, and brain stem vertical lines, respectively. RESULTS: Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, simplified callosal angle, frontal horn diameter, z-Evans Index, and cella media vertical width did not show significant systematic differences in any of 6 section plane combinations studied. The remaining 7 biomarkers (including the Evans Index and callosal angle) showed significant differences in up to 4 of 6 mutually compared section plane combinations. The values obtained from sections aligned with the brain stem vertical line (parallel to the posterior brain stem margin) showed the most deviating results from other section angulations. CONCLUSIONS: Seven of 12 idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus biomarkers including the frequently used Evans Index and callosal angle showed statistically significant deviations when measured on sections whose angulations differed or did not comply with the proper section definition published in the original literature. Strict adherence to the methodology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus biomarker assessment is, therefore, essential to avoid an incorrect diagnosis. Increased radiologic and clinical attention should be paid to the biomarkers showing low angulation-related variability yet high specificity for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-related morphologic changes such as the z-Evans Index, frontal horn diameter, or disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004104
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127145545.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3174/ajnr.A7095 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33888457
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Ryska, P $u From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (P.R., O.S.), University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be / $c P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Salzer, J. Malm, J. Zizka
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Systematic analysis of angulation-related variability of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus imaging biomarkers has not been published yet. Our aim was to evaluate the variability of these radiologic biomarkers with respect to imaging plane angulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty subjects (35 with clinically confirmed idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and 45 age- and sex-matched healthy controls) were prospectively enrolled in a 3T brain MR imaging study. Two independent readers assessed 12 radiologic idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus biomarkers on sections aligned parallel or perpendicular to the bicallosal, bicommissural, hypophysis-fastigium, and brain stem vertical lines, respectively. RESULTS: Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, simplified callosal angle, frontal horn diameter, z-Evans Index, and cella media vertical width did not show significant systematic differences in any of 6 section plane combinations studied. The remaining 7 biomarkers (including the Evans Index and callosal angle) showed significant differences in up to 4 of 6 mutually compared section plane combinations. The values obtained from sections aligned with the brain stem vertical line (parallel to the posterior brain stem margin) showed the most deviating results from other section angulations. CONCLUSIONS: Seven of 12 idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus biomarkers including the frequently used Evans Index and callosal angle showed statistically significant deviations when measured on sections whose angulations differed or did not comply with the proper section definition published in the original literature. Strict adherence to the methodology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus biomarker assessment is, therefore, essential to avoid an incorrect diagnosis. Increased radiologic and clinical attention should be paid to the biomarkers showing low angulation-related variability yet high specificity for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-related morphologic changes such as the z-Evans Index, frontal horn diameter, or disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a biologické markery $7 D015415
650    _2
$a mozek $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001921
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a normotenzní hydrocefalus $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D006850
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Slezak, O $u From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (P.R., O.S.), University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology (O.S.), Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Eklund, A $u Departments of Radiation Sciences (A.E.)
700    1_
$a Salzer, J $u Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J.S., J.M.), Section of Neurology
700    1_
$a Malm, J $u Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J.S., J.M.), Section of Neurology
700    1_
$a Zizka, J $u Imaging and Functional Medicine (J.Z.), University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden jan.zizka@regionvasterbotten.se
773    0_
$w MED00009116 $t AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology $x 1936-959X $g Roč. 42, č. 7 (2021), s. 1201-1207
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33888457 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127145542 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751534 $s 1155253
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 42 $c 7 $d 1201-1207 $e 20210422 $i 1936-959X $m American journal of neuroradiology $n AJNR Am J Neuroradiol $x MED00009116
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace