-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Detection of monoclonal free light chains by immunofixation electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing - comparison with the quantitative method of determination
P. Kušnierová, D. Zeman, K. Revendová, O. Dlouhý
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- imunoglobuliny - lambda-řetězce analýza imunologie MeSH
- isoelektrická fokusace metody MeSH
- krevní proteiny analýza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky analýza imunologie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
The study aimed to investigate free light chain (FLC) monoclonality in patients with an abnormal free kappa/lambda ratio (FLC ratio). Seventy serum samples with abnormal FLC ratio were examined using an immunoturbidimetry (Binding Site, SPA) and the two different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (1. Sebia diagnostic kit; 2. in house methods), the monoclonal or oligoclonal bands of (FLC) by immunofixation electrophoresis (IE) and isoelectric focusing followed by affinity immunoblotting (IEF/AIB). The reference interval was calculated by non-parametric percentile method. 5.7% of samples examined by IE were suspected of monoclonal character of FLCs, but subsequently monoclonality was refuted by more sensitive IEF/AIB method; 7%, resp. 2.9% of samples showed FLC kappa, resp. FLC lambda oligoclonal character of bands. A statistically significant dependence was found between FLC ratio (Sebia) and FLC ratio (SPA), rs = 0.510, p = .001. Kappa statistic evaluated a fair conformity between the FLC ratio (Sebia) and IEF/AIB (kappa = 0.468) and between FLC ratio (in house) and IEF/AIB (kappa = 0.300). The verified reference interval for FLC ratio (Binding Site) is between 0.35 and 2.18. The IEF/AIB is the most sensitive method to discriminate between monoclonal and oligoclonal bands of FLC. The Binding Site and Sebia diagnostic kits do not give consistent results. The Binding Site diagnostic kit provides more results above reference interval of FLC ratios. For routine decision on monoclonality of the FLC ratio (SPA) it is advisable to use a verified reference interval.
Department of Biomedical Sciences Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Physics Faculty of Natural Sciences University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004828
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127144936.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/00365513.2020.1804608 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32779491
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kušnierová, Pavlína $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Detection of monoclonal free light chains by immunofixation electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing - comparison with the quantitative method of determination / $c P. Kušnierová, D. Zeman, K. Revendová, O. Dlouhý
- 520 9_
- $a The study aimed to investigate free light chain (FLC) monoclonality in patients with an abnormal free kappa/lambda ratio (FLC ratio). Seventy serum samples with abnormal FLC ratio were examined using an immunoturbidimetry (Binding Site, SPA) and the two different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (1. Sebia diagnostic kit; 2. in house methods), the monoclonal or oligoclonal bands of (FLC) by immunofixation electrophoresis (IE) and isoelectric focusing followed by affinity immunoblotting (IEF/AIB). The reference interval was calculated by non-parametric percentile method. 5.7% of samples examined by IE were suspected of monoclonal character of FLCs, but subsequently monoclonality was refuted by more sensitive IEF/AIB method; 7%, resp. 2.9% of samples showed FLC kappa, resp. FLC lambda oligoclonal character of bands. A statistically significant dependence was found between FLC ratio (Sebia) and FLC ratio (SPA), rs = 0.510, p = .001. Kappa statistic evaluated a fair conformity between the FLC ratio (Sebia) and IEF/AIB (kappa = 0.468) and between FLC ratio (in house) and IEF/AIB (kappa = 0.300). The verified reference interval for FLC ratio (Binding Site) is between 0.35 and 2.18. The IEF/AIB is the most sensitive method to discriminate between monoclonal and oligoclonal bands of FLC. The Binding Site and Sebia diagnostic kits do not give consistent results. The Binding Site diagnostic kit provides more results above reference interval of FLC ratios. For routine decision on monoclonality of the FLC ratio (SPA) it is advisable to use a verified reference interval.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x analýza $x imunologie $7 D000911
- 650 _2
- $a krevní proteiny $x analýza $7 D001798
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobuliny - lambda-řetězce $x analýza $x imunologie $7 D007146
- 650 _2
- $a isoelektrická fokusace $x metody $7 D007525
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zeman, David $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Revendová, Kamila $u Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dlouhý, Ondřej $u Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010597 $t Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation $x 1502-7686 $g Roč. 80, č. 7 (2020), s. 556-561
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32779491 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127144932 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1752123 $s 1155977
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 80 $c 7 $d 556-561 $e 20200811 $i 1502-7686 $m Scandinavian journal of clinical & laboratory investigation $n Scand J Clin Lab Invest $x MED00010597
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113