• Something wrong with this record ?

Can functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry replace insulin infusion in patients? A nested substudy in a randomized controlled trial with 6 months' follow-up

P. Waldauf, T. Urban, A. Krajčová, K. Jiroutková, B. Blahutová, B. Bakalář, K. Řasová, M. Grünerová-Lippertová, J. Gojda, F. Duška

. 2022 ; 46 (1) : 249-253. [pub] 20210729

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22019552

BACKGROUND: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry (FESCE) can deliver active exercise to critically ill patients, including those who are sedated. Aerobic exercise is known to stimulate skeletal muscle glucose uptake. We asked whether FESCE can reduce intravenous insulin requirements and improve insulin sensitivity in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHOD: We performed an a priori-planned secondary analysis of data from an outcome-based randomized controlled trial (NCT02864745) of FESCE-based early-mobility program vs standard of care in mechanically ventilated patients. We analyzed glucose profile, glucose intake, and insulin requirements during ICU stay in all enrolled patients. In a nested subgroup, we performed hyperinsulinemic (120 mIU/min/m2 ) euglycemic clamps at days 0, 7, and 180 (n = 30, 23, and 11, respectively). RESULTS: We randomized 150 patients 1:1 to receive intervention or standard of care. Seventeen (23%) patients in each study arm had a history of diabetes. During ICU stay, patients received 137 ± 65 and 137 ± 88 g/day carbohydrate (P = .97), and 31 vs 35 (P = .62) of them required insulin infusion to maintain blood glucose 8.61 ± 2.82 vs 8.73 ± 2.67 mM (P = .75, n = 11,254). In those treated with insulin, median daily dose was 53 IU (interquartile range [IQR], 25-95) vs 62 IU (IQR, 26-96) in the intervention and control arm, respectively (P = .44). In the subgroup of patients undergoing hyperglycemic clamps, insulin sensitivities improved similarly and significantly from acute and protracted critical illness to 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSION: The FESCE-based early-mobility program does not significantly reduce insulin requirements in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22019552
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804135752.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jpen.2213 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34165818
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Waldauf, Petr $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Can functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry replace insulin infusion in patients? A nested substudy in a randomized controlled trial with 6 months' follow-up / $c P. Waldauf, T. Urban, A. Krajčová, K. Jiroutková, B. Blahutová, B. Bakalář, K. Řasová, M. Grünerová-Lippertová, J. Gojda, F. Duška
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry (FESCE) can deliver active exercise to critically ill patients, including those who are sedated. Aerobic exercise is known to stimulate skeletal muscle glucose uptake. We asked whether FESCE can reduce intravenous insulin requirements and improve insulin sensitivity in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHOD: We performed an a priori-planned secondary analysis of data from an outcome-based randomized controlled trial (NCT02864745) of FESCE-based early-mobility program vs standard of care in mechanically ventilated patients. We analyzed glucose profile, glucose intake, and insulin requirements during ICU stay in all enrolled patients. In a nested subgroup, we performed hyperinsulinemic (120 mIU/min/m2 ) euglycemic clamps at days 0, 7, and 180 (n = 30, 23, and 11, respectively). RESULTS: We randomized 150 patients 1:1 to receive intervention or standard of care. Seventeen (23%) patients in each study arm had a history of diabetes. During ICU stay, patients received 137 ± 65 and 137 ± 88 g/day carbohydrate (P = .97), and 31 vs 35 (P = .62) of them required insulin infusion to maintain blood glucose 8.61 ± 2.82 vs 8.73 ± 2.67 mM (P = .75, n = 11,254). In those treated with insulin, median daily dose was 53 IU (interquartile range [IQR], 25-95) vs 62 IU (IQR, 26-96) in the intervention and control arm, respectively (P = .44). In the subgroup of patients undergoing hyperglycemic clamps, insulin sensitivities improved similarly and significantly from acute and protracted critical illness to 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSION: The FESCE-based early-mobility program does not significantly reduce insulin requirements in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.
650    12
$a kritický stav $7 D016638
650    _2
$a elektrická stimulace $7 D004558
650    _2
$a ergometrie $7 D016552
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a inzulin $7 D007328
650    12
$a jednotky intenzivní péče $7 D007362
650    _2
$a umělé dýchání $7 D012121
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Urban, Tomáš $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Krajčová, Adéla $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jiroutková, Kateřina $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Blahutová, Barbora $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000316170656
700    1_
$a Bakalář, Bob $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Řasová, Kamila $u Department of Rehabilitation, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000232011770 $7 mzk2007417576
700    1_
$a Grünerová-Lippertová, Marcela $u Department of Rehabilitation, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gojda, Jan $u Department of Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Duška, František $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University, The Third Faculty of Medicine and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000315594078 $7 mzk2007386027
773    0_
$w MED00002877 $t JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition $x 1941-2444 $g Roč. 46, č. 1 (2022), s. 249-253
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34165818 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804135745 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822953 $s 1170795
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 46 $c 1 $d 249-253 $e 20210729 $i 1941-2444 $m JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition $n JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr $x MED00002877
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options