-
Something wrong with this record ?
Studying Wild Plant Pathosystems to Understand Crop Plant Pathosystems: Status, Gaps, Challenges, and Perspectives
A. Lebeda, JJ. Burdon
Language English Country United States
Document type Review, Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1970 to 1 year ago
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 1970 to 12 months ago
- MeSH
- Ecosystem * MeSH
- Plant Diseases genetics MeSH
- Oomycetes * genetics MeSH
- Plants MeSH
- Lactuca MeSH
- Plant Breeding MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Phytopathology is a highly complex scientific discipline. Initially, its focus was on the study of plant-pathogen interactions in agricultural and forestry production systems. Host-pathogen interactions in natural plant communities were generally overlooked until the 1970s when plant pathologists and evolutionary biologists started to take an interest in these interactions, and their dynamics in natural plant populations, communities, and ecosystems. This article introduces the general principles of plant pathosystems, provides a basic critical overview of current knowledge of host-pathogen interactions in natural plant pathosystems, and shows how this knowledge is important for future developments in plant pathology especially as it applies in cropping systems, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Plant pathosystems can be further divided according to the structure and origin of control, as autonomous (wild plant pathosystems, WPPs) or deterministic (crop plant pathosystems, CPPs). WPPs are characterized by the disease triangle and closed-loop (feedback) controls, and CPPs are characterized by the disease tetrahedron and open-loop (non-feedback) controls. Basic general, ecological, genetic, and population structural and functional differences between WPPs and CPPs are described. It is evident that we lack a focus on long-term observations and research of diseases and their dynamics in natural plant populations, metapopulations, communities, ecosystems, and biomes, as well as their direct or indirect relationships to CPPs. Differences and connections between WPPs and CPPs, and why, and how, these are important for agriculture varies. WPP and CPP may be linked by strong biological interactions, especially where the pathogen is in common. This is demonstrated through a case study of lettuce (Lactuca spp., L. serriola and L. sativa) and lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae). In other cases where there is no such direct biological linkage, the study of WPPs can provide a deeper understanding of how ecology and genetics interacts to drive disease through time. These studies provide insights into ways in which farming practices may be changed to limit disease development. Research on interactions between pathosystems, the "cross-talk" of WPPs and CPPs, is still very limited and, as shown in interactions between wild and cultivated Lactuca spp.-B. lactucae associations, can be highly complex. The implications and applications of this knowledge in plant breeding, crop management, and disease control measures are considered. This review concludes with a discussion of theoretical, general and specific aspects, challenges and limits of future WPP research, and application of their results in agriculture.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23010684
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230801132603.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1094/PHYTO-01-22-0018-PER $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36256745
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Lebeda, Aleš $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000033601583X $7 ola200208028
- 245 10
- $a Studying Wild Plant Pathosystems to Understand Crop Plant Pathosystems: Status, Gaps, Challenges, and Perspectives / $c A. Lebeda, JJ. Burdon
- 520 9_
- $a Phytopathology is a highly complex scientific discipline. Initially, its focus was on the study of plant-pathogen interactions in agricultural and forestry production systems. Host-pathogen interactions in natural plant communities were generally overlooked until the 1970s when plant pathologists and evolutionary biologists started to take an interest in these interactions, and their dynamics in natural plant populations, communities, and ecosystems. This article introduces the general principles of plant pathosystems, provides a basic critical overview of current knowledge of host-pathogen interactions in natural plant pathosystems, and shows how this knowledge is important for future developments in plant pathology especially as it applies in cropping systems, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Plant pathosystems can be further divided according to the structure and origin of control, as autonomous (wild plant pathosystems, WPPs) or deterministic (crop plant pathosystems, CPPs). WPPs are characterized by the disease triangle and closed-loop (feedback) controls, and CPPs are characterized by the disease tetrahedron and open-loop (non-feedback) controls. Basic general, ecological, genetic, and population structural and functional differences between WPPs and CPPs are described. It is evident that we lack a focus on long-term observations and research of diseases and their dynamics in natural plant populations, metapopulations, communities, ecosystems, and biomes, as well as their direct or indirect relationships to CPPs. Differences and connections between WPPs and CPPs, and why, and how, these are important for agriculture varies. WPP and CPP may be linked by strong biological interactions, especially where the pathogen is in common. This is demonstrated through a case study of lettuce (Lactuca spp., L. serriola and L. sativa) and lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae). In other cases where there is no such direct biological linkage, the study of WPPs can provide a deeper understanding of how ecology and genetics interacts to drive disease through time. These studies provide insights into ways in which farming practices may be changed to limit disease development. Research on interactions between pathosystems, the "cross-talk" of WPPs and CPPs, is still very limited and, as shown in interactions between wild and cultivated Lactuca spp.-B. lactucae associations, can be highly complex. The implications and applications of this knowledge in plant breeding, crop management, and disease control measures are considered. This review concludes with a discussion of theoretical, general and specific aspects, challenges and limits of future WPP research, and application of their results in agriculture.
- 650 12
- $a ekosystém $7 D017753
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci rostlin $x genetika $7 D010935
- 650 _2
- $a šlechtění rostlin $7 D000069600
- 650 _2
- $a rostliny $7 D010944
- 650 12
- $a oomycety $x genetika $7 D009868
- 650 _2
- $a salát (hlávkový) $7 D018545
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Burdon, Jeremy J $u 1 Catalano Street, Wright, A.C.T. 2611, Australia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003831 $t Phytopathology $x 0031-949X $g Roč. 113, č. 3 (2023), s. 365-380
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36256745 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230718 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230801132559 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1963253 $s 1196949
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 113 $c 3 $d 365-380 $e 20230221 $i 0031-949X $m Phytopathology $n Phytopathology $x MED00003831
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230718