-
Something wrong with this record ?
Appearance of levator ani muscle subdivision defects on level III vaginal support structures in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: an MRI study
L. Horcicka, M. Krcmar, M. Nemec, L. Hympanova, J. Feyereisl, L. Krofta
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
Grant Agency of Charles University research project Cooperatio (project no.207035)
lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2010-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Pelvic Floor injuries MeSH
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse * diagnostic imaging etiology MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Vagina * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Injury of the levator ani muscle (LAM) is a significant risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The puborectalis (PRM) and pubovisceral (PVM) subdivisions are level III vaginal support structures. The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in patterns of LAM subdivisions in healthy nulliparous women. Secondarily, we evaluated the presence of different LAM injury in a POP-symptomatic cohort. METHODS: This retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study included: 64 nulligravidae without any pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and 526 women of various parity with symptomatic POP. Primary outcome was PVM and PRM morphology on the axial planes: the attachment site on the pubic bone, and the visible separation/border between the PVM and PRM. The attachment was scored as "normal" or "abnormal". The "abnormal" attachment was divided in two types: "type I"-loss of the muscle substance, but preservation of the overall muscle architecture-and "type II"-muscle detachment from the pubic bone. RESULTS: The puboanal muscle (PAM) subdivision was evaluated as a representative part of the PVM. The PAM and PRM attachments and separation were distinguished in all asymptomatic nulliparae. PAM and PRM attachments did not significantly differ. POP group characteristics were parity 1.9 ± 0.8, instrumental delivery 5.6%, hysterectomy or POP surgery 60%, all Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stages, LAM defect 77.6% (PRM: 77.1%; PAM: 51.3%). Type I injuries were more frequent (PRM 54.7%; PAM 53.9%) compared with type II (PRM 29.4%; PAM 42.1%). CONCLUSIONS: A LAM defect was present in 77.6% of women with symptomatic POP. In PRM and PAM subdivisions type I injury was more frequent than type II.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Ruska 2411 87 100 00 Prague Czech Republic
Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Podolské nábřeží 157 147 00 Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23016759
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20231026105554.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 231013s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-023-05533-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37119270
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Horcicka, L $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Appearance of levator ani muscle subdivision defects on level III vaginal support structures in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: an MRI study / $c L. Horcicka, M. Krcmar, M. Nemec, L. Hympanova, J. Feyereisl, L. Krofta
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Injury of the levator ani muscle (LAM) is a significant risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The puborectalis (PRM) and pubovisceral (PVM) subdivisions are level III vaginal support structures. The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in patterns of LAM subdivisions in healthy nulliparous women. Secondarily, we evaluated the presence of different LAM injury in a POP-symptomatic cohort. METHODS: This retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study included: 64 nulligravidae without any pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and 526 women of various parity with symptomatic POP. Primary outcome was PVM and PRM morphology on the axial planes: the attachment site on the pubic bone, and the visible separation/border between the PVM and PRM. The attachment was scored as "normal" or "abnormal". The "abnormal" attachment was divided in two types: "type I"-loss of the muscle substance, but preservation of the overall muscle architecture-and "type II"-muscle detachment from the pubic bone. RESULTS: The puboanal muscle (PAM) subdivision was evaluated as a representative part of the PVM. The PAM and PRM attachments and separation were distinguished in all asymptomatic nulliparae. PAM and PRM attachments did not significantly differ. POP group characteristics were parity 1.9 ± 0.8, instrumental delivery 5.6%, hysterectomy or POP surgery 60%, all Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stages, LAM defect 77.6% (PRM: 77.1%; PAM: 51.3%). Type I injuries were more frequent (PRM 54.7%; PAM 53.9%) compared with type II (PRM 29.4%; PAM 42.1%). CONCLUSIONS: A LAM defect was present in 77.6% of women with symptomatic POP. In PRM and PAM subdivisions type I injury was more frequent than type II.
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a vagina $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D014621
- 650 12
- $a prolaps pánevních orgánů $x diagnostické zobrazování $x etiologie $7 D056887
- 650 _2
- $a pánevní dno $x zranění $7 D017773
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Krcmar, M $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 147 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nemec, M $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hympanova, L $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.hympanova@upmd.eu $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 147 00, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.hympanova@upmd.eu
- 700 1_
- $a Feyereisl, J $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 147 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Krofta, L $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 147 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 34, č. 8 (2023), s. 1971-1982
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37119270 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20231013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20231026105549 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2000343 $s 1203121
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 34 $c 8 $d 1971-1982 $e 20230429 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
- GRA __
- $a Grant Agency of Charles University research project Cooperatio (project no.207035) $p lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20231013