-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Patient satisfaction with ultrasound, whole-body CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative ovarian cancer staging: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional survey
P. Pinto, L. Valentin, M. Borčinová, M. Wiesnerová, F. Filip, A. Burgetova, M. Masek, L. Lambert, V. Chiappa, D. Franchi, AC. Testa, F. Moro, G. Avesani, C. Panico, S. Alessi, P. Pricolo, R. Vigorito, G. Calareso, R. Kocian, J. Slama, A. Fagotti,...
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2001-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2001-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci
PubMed
38531539
DOI
10.1136/ijgc-2023-005264
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- celotělové zobrazování metody MeSH
- difuzní magnetická rezonance * metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory vaječníků * diagnostické zobrazování patologie MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie * metody MeSH
- předoperační péče metody MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- spokojenost pacientů * MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- ultrasonografie * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: In addition to the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods, patient-reported satisfaction with imaging methods is important. OBJECTIVE: To report a secondary outcome of the prospective international multicenter Imaging Study in Advanced ovArian Cancer (ISAAC Study), detailing patients' experience with abdomino-pelvic ultrasound, whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) for pre-operative ovarian cancer work-up. METHODS: In total, 144 patients with suspected ovarian cancer at four institutions in two countries (Italy, Czech Republic) underwent ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI for pre-operative work-up between January 2020 and November 2022. After having undergone all three examinations, the patients filled in a questionnaire evaluating their overall experience and experience in five domains: preparation before the examination, duration of examination, noise during the procedure, radiation load of CT, and surrounding space. Pain perception, examination-related patient-perceived unexpected, unpleasant, or dangerous events ('adverse events'), and preferred method were also noted. RESULTS: Ultrasound was the preferred method by 49% (70/144) of responders, followed by CT (38%, 55/144), and WB-DWI/MRI (13%, 19/144) (p<0.001). The poorest experience in all domains was reported for WB-DWI/MRI, which was also associated with the largest number of patients who reported adverse events (eg, dyspnea). Patients reported higher levels of pain during the ultrasound examination than during CT and WB-DWI/MRI (p<0.001): 78% (112/144) reported no pain or mild pain, 19% (27/144) moderate pain, and 3% (5/144) reported severe pain (pain score >7 of 10) during the ultrasound examination. We did not identify any factors related to patients' preferred method. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound was the imaging method preferred by most patients despite being associated with more pain during the examination in comparison with CT and WB-DWI/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03808792.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö Lund University Lund Sweden
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute Milan Italy
Department of Gynecology Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil Lisboa Portugal
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Skane University Hospital Malmo Sweden
Department of Radiology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
Division of Radiology Istituto Europeo di Oncologia Milan Italy
Masaryk University Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Brno Czech Republic
Preventive Gynecology Unit Division of Gynaecology European Institute of Oncology Milan Italy
Preventive Gynecology Unit Division of Gynecology European Institute of Oncology Milan Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013586
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134016.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005264 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38531539
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Pinto, Patrícia $u Department of Gynecology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Lisbon Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000264598529
- 245 10
- $a Patient satisfaction with ultrasound, whole-body CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative ovarian cancer staging: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional survey / $c P. Pinto, L. Valentin, M. Borčinová, M. Wiesnerová, F. Filip, A. Burgetova, M. Masek, L. Lambert, V. Chiappa, D. Franchi, AC. Testa, F. Moro, G. Avesani, C. Panico, S. Alessi, P. Pricolo, R. Vigorito, G. Calareso, R. Kocian, J. Slama, A. Fagotti, AMV. Urbinati, M. Signorelli, F. Bertolina, D. Cibula, D. Fischerova
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: In addition to the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods, patient-reported satisfaction with imaging methods is important. OBJECTIVE: To report a secondary outcome of the prospective international multicenter Imaging Study in Advanced ovArian Cancer (ISAAC Study), detailing patients' experience with abdomino-pelvic ultrasound, whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) for pre-operative ovarian cancer work-up. METHODS: In total, 144 patients with suspected ovarian cancer at four institutions in two countries (Italy, Czech Republic) underwent ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI for pre-operative work-up between January 2020 and November 2022. After having undergone all three examinations, the patients filled in a questionnaire evaluating their overall experience and experience in five domains: preparation before the examination, duration of examination, noise during the procedure, radiation load of CT, and surrounding space. Pain perception, examination-related patient-perceived unexpected, unpleasant, or dangerous events ('adverse events'), and preferred method were also noted. RESULTS: Ultrasound was the preferred method by 49% (70/144) of responders, followed by CT (38%, 55/144), and WB-DWI/MRI (13%, 19/144) (p<0.001). The poorest experience in all domains was reported for WB-DWI/MRI, which was also associated with the largest number of patients who reported adverse events (eg, dyspnea). Patients reported higher levels of pain during the ultrasound examination than during CT and WB-DWI/MRI (p<0.001): 78% (112/144) reported no pain or mild pain, 19% (27/144) moderate pain, and 3% (5/144) reported severe pain (pain score >7 of 10) during the ultrasound examination. We did not identify any factors related to patients' preferred method. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound was the imaging method preferred by most patients despite being associated with more pain during the examination in comparison with CT and WB-DWI/MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03808792.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a nádory vaječníků $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D010051
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a difuzní magnetická rezonance $x metody $7 D038524
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 12
- $a ultrasonografie $x metody $7 D014463
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
- 650 12
- $a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a celotělové zobrazování $x metody $7 D051598
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a předoperační péče $x metody $7 D011300
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Valentin, Lil $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden $u Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Borčinová, Martina $u Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000025016149X
- 700 1_
- $a Wiesnerová, Markéta $u Masaryk University Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Filip, Fruhauf $u Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Burgetova, Andrea $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Masek, Martin $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lambert, Lukas $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Chiappa, Valentina $u Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Franchi, Dorella $u Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Testa, Antonia Carla $u Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy $u Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Moro, Francesca $u Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000250707245
- 700 1_
- $a Avesani, Giacomo $u Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/000000019926760X
- 700 1_
- $a Panico, Camilla $u Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Alessi, Sarah $u Division of Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Pricolo, Paola $u Division of Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Vigorito, Raffaella $u Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Calareso, Giuseppina $u Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Kocian, Roman $u Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Slama, Jiri $u Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fagotti, Anna $u Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Lazio, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Urbinati, Ailyn Mariela Vidal $u Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Signorelli, Mauro $u Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Bertolina, Francesca $u Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Foundation IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, David $u Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Fischerova, Daniela $u Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic daniela.fischerova@vfn.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272243218 $7 xx0074804
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009896 $t International journal of gynecological cancer $x 1525-1438 $g Roč. 34, č. 6 (2024), s. 871-878
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38531539 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134010 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143409 $s 1225452
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 34 $c 6 $d 871-878 $e 20240603 $i 1525-1438 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725
