-
Something wrong with this record ?
Left atrial appendage occlusion: Percutaneous and surgical approaches in everyday practice
J. Gofus, P. Zacek, Y. Shahin, K. Medilek, L. Haman, J. Vojacek
Language English Country Poland
Document type Journal Article, Review
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2003
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2013-04-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2003
PubMed
38493470
DOI
10.33963/v.phj.99369
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Anticoagulants therapeutic use MeSH
- Stroke * prevention & control complications MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation * complications MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Atrial Appendage * surgery MeSH
- Thromboembolism * prevention & control chemically induced MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Prophylactic left atrial appendage occlusion has been suggested as a means of reducing cardioembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Its clinical benefits have been discussed together with potential endocrine or hemodynamic adverse effects, with conflicting conclusions. We aimed to provide a thorough overview of the current literature and a recommendation for daily clinical decision-making. A comprehensive Medline search through PubMed was conducted to search for relevant articles, which were further filtered using the title and abstract. Sixty-five articles were selected as relevant to the topic. Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for other reasons is effective in terms of thromboembolism risk reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Surgical occlusion is safe, and epicardial closure techniques are preferred. Thoracoscopic and transcatheter techniques are also feasible, and the individual treatment choice must be tailored to the patient. The concerns about endocrine imbalance or risk of heart failure after occlusion are not supported by evidence. Current evidence is conflicting with regard to hemodynamic consequences of appendage occlusion.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24014594
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905133507.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.33963/v.phj.99369 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38493470
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Gofus, Jan $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. jan.gofus@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Left atrial appendage occlusion: Percutaneous and surgical approaches in everyday practice / $c J. Gofus, P. Zacek, Y. Shahin, K. Medilek, L. Haman, J. Vojacek
- 520 9_
- $a Prophylactic left atrial appendage occlusion has been suggested as a means of reducing cardioembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Its clinical benefits have been discussed together with potential endocrine or hemodynamic adverse effects, with conflicting conclusions. We aimed to provide a thorough overview of the current literature and a recommendation for daily clinical decision-making. A comprehensive Medline search through PubMed was conducted to search for relevant articles, which were further filtered using the title and abstract. Sixty-five articles were selected as relevant to the topic. Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for other reasons is effective in terms of thromboembolism risk reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Surgical occlusion is safe, and epicardial closure techniques are preferred. Thoracoscopic and transcatheter techniques are also feasible, and the individual treatment choice must be tailored to the patient. The concerns about endocrine imbalance or risk of heart failure after occlusion are not supported by evidence. Current evidence is conflicting with regard to hemodynamic consequences of appendage occlusion.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a antikoagulancia $x terapeutické užití $7 D000925
- 650 12
- $a síňové ouško $x chirurgie $7 D020517
- 650 12
- $a fibrilace síní $x komplikace $7 D001281
- 650 12
- $a cévní mozková příhoda $x prevence a kontrola $x komplikace $7 D020521
- 650 12
- $a tromboembolie $x prevence a kontrola $x chemicky indukované $7 D013923
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Zacek, Pavel $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Shahin, Youssef $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Medilek, Karel $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine - Cardioangiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Haman, Ludek $u 1st Department of Internal Medicine - Cardioangiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vojacek, Jan $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003056 $t Kardiologia polska $x 1897-4279 $g Roč. 82, č. 3 (2024), s. 267-275
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38493470 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905133501 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2144013 $s 1226460
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 82 $c 3 $d 267-275 $e 20240317 $i 1897-4279 $m Kardiologia polska $n Kardiol Pol $x MED00003056
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725