• Something wrong with this record ?

The Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) Scale: an international reliability and validation study

G. Esposito, E. Dilaghi, C. Costa-Santos, I. Ligato, B. Annibale, M. Dinis-Ribeiro, M. Areia, GRACE Investigators

. 2025 ; 57 (4) : 312-320. [pub] 20240925

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Validation Study

BACKGROUND: Mucosal visualization during upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy can be impaired by the presence of foam, bubbles, and mucus. Some UGI endoscopy visibility scales have been proposed but have not undergone multicenter validation. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) scale. METHODS: A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted. The GRACE scale is based on a score from 0 (worst) to 3 (excellent) for esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, for a total ranging from 0 to 9. In phase 1, four expert endoscopists evaluated 60 images twice, with a 2-week interval between rounds; in phase 2, the same 60 images were scored twice by one expert and one nonexpert endoscopist from 27 endoscopy departments worldwide. For reproducibility assessment and real-time validation, the scale was applied to consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy at each center. RESULTS: On internal validation, interobserver agreement was 0.81 (95 %CI 0.73-0.87) and 0.80 (95 %CI 0.72-0.86), with reliability of 0.73 (95 %CI 0.63-0.82) and 0.72 (95 %CI 0.63-0.81), in the two rounds, respectively. On external validation, overall interobserver agreement was 0.85 (95 %CI 0.82-0.88) and reliability was 0.79 (95 %CI 0.73-0.84). In real-time evaluation, the overall proportion of correct classifications was 0.80 (95 %CI 0.77-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The GRACE scale showed good interobserver agreement, reliability, and validity. The widespread use of this scale could enhance quality and standardize the assessment of mucosal cleanliness during UGI endoscopy, pushing endoscopists to strive for excellent visibility and reducing the risk of missed lesions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25009401
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429135027.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/a-2422-0856 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39321961
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Esposito, Gianluca $u Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000222425048
245    14
$a The Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) Scale: an international reliability and validation study / $c G. Esposito, E. Dilaghi, C. Costa-Santos, I. Ligato, B. Annibale, M. Dinis-Ribeiro, M. Areia, GRACE Investigators
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Mucosal visualization during upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy can be impaired by the presence of foam, bubbles, and mucus. Some UGI endoscopy visibility scales have been proposed but have not undergone multicenter validation. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) scale. METHODS: A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted. The GRACE scale is based on a score from 0 (worst) to 3 (excellent) for esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, for a total ranging from 0 to 9. In phase 1, four expert endoscopists evaluated 60 images twice, with a 2-week interval between rounds; in phase 2, the same 60 images were scored twice by one expert and one nonexpert endoscopist from 27 endoscopy departments worldwide. For reproducibility assessment and real-time validation, the scale was applied to consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy at each center. RESULTS: On internal validation, interobserver agreement was 0.81 (95 %CI 0.73-0.87) and 0.80 (95 %CI 0.72-0.86), with reliability of 0.73 (95 %CI 0.63-0.82) and 0.72 (95 %CI 0.63-0.81), in the two rounds, respectively. On external validation, overall interobserver agreement was 0.85 (95 %CI 0.82-0.88) and reliability was 0.79 (95 %CI 0.73-0.84). In real-time evaluation, the overall proportion of correct classifications was 0.80 (95 %CI 0.77-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The GRACE scale showed good interobserver agreement, reliability, and validity. The widespread use of this scale could enhance quality and standardize the assessment of mucosal cleanliness during UGI endoscopy, pushing endoscopists to strive for excellent visibility and reducing the risk of missed lesions.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a gastroskopie $x metody $7 D005773
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a žaludeční sliznice $7 D005753
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a duodenum $7 D004386
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Dilaghi, Emanuele $u Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Costa-Santos, Cristina $u Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal $u Center for Health Technology and Services Research - CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
700    1_
$a Ligato, Irene $u Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Annibale, Bruno $u Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Dinis-Ribeiro, Mário $u Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal $u Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
700    1_
$a Areia, Miguel $u Francisco Gentil Portuguese Institute for Oncology of Coimbra, Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra (IPO Coimbra), Coimbra, Portugal $u RISE@CI-IPO (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal $1 https://orcid.org/0000000197878175
710    2_
$a GRACE Investigators
773    0_
$w MED00009605 $t Endoscopy $x 1438-8812 $g Roč. 57, č. 4 (2025), s. 312-320
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39321961 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429135023 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311029 $s 1246482
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 57 $c 4 $d 312-320 $e 20240925 $i 1438-8812 $m Endoscopy $n Endoscopy $x MED00009605
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...