Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib Against Traditional Therapies in Severe Alopecia Areata: A Retrospective Cohort Study

AJ. Stefanis, T. Dolezal, S. Gkalpakiotis, P. Arenberger

. 2025 ; 24 (2) : e16666. [pub] 20241120

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25010097

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata is a common autoimmune disease which results in reversible hair loss. Janus kinase inhibitors are prescribed for severe alopecia areata with encouraging results. There are no studies comparing the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors to traditional treatment options, such as topical immunomodulators and traditional immunosuppressants. AIMS: To retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an approved Janus kinase inhibitor, to other treatments for severe AA during a 6-month treatment period. MATERIALS/METHODS: We included patients with newly presenting, relapsing or treatment-resistant alopecia areata with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≥ 50, for the period between July 2021 and July 2023. Medical histories were reviewed and possible side effects were recorded. Primary endpoints were SALT ≤ 20 and SALT ≤ 10 after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (53 females) were divided into three groups: topical immunomodulators (51 patients); baricitinib (19 patients); and a group receiving pulsed intramuscular corticosteroids or traditional immunosuppressants (11 patients). Twenty-one patients received more than one treatment options within 2 years. After 6 months, the baricitinib group showed superior efficacy with 32% and 26% of patients achieving SALT ≤ 20 and SALT ≤ 10, compared to 12% and 9% in both other groups. Baricitinib demonstrated better secondary outcomes (50% and 90% reduction from initial SALT scores). All treatments exhibited mild-to-moderate and expected side effects. Weight gain, which had not been reported in clinical trials for alopecia areata, was observed in three baricitinib-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib was superior to traditional treatments for severe alopecia areata after 6 months. Weight gain concerned 16% of patients receiving baricitinib.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25010097
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429134940.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jocd.16666 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39564906
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Stefanis, Athanasios J $u Department of Dermatovenerology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000309934283
245    10
$a Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib Against Traditional Therapies in Severe Alopecia Areata: A Retrospective Cohort Study / $c AJ. Stefanis, T. Dolezal, S. Gkalpakiotis, P. Arenberger
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata is a common autoimmune disease which results in reversible hair loss. Janus kinase inhibitors are prescribed for severe alopecia areata with encouraging results. There are no studies comparing the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors to traditional treatment options, such as topical immunomodulators and traditional immunosuppressants. AIMS: To retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an approved Janus kinase inhibitor, to other treatments for severe AA during a 6-month treatment period. MATERIALS/METHODS: We included patients with newly presenting, relapsing or treatment-resistant alopecia areata with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≥ 50, for the period between July 2021 and July 2023. Medical histories were reviewed and possible side effects were recorded. Primary endpoints were SALT ≤ 20 and SALT ≤ 10 after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (53 females) were divided into three groups: topical immunomodulators (51 patients); baricitinib (19 patients); and a group receiving pulsed intramuscular corticosteroids or traditional immunosuppressants (11 patients). Twenty-one patients received more than one treatment options within 2 years. After 6 months, the baricitinib group showed superior efficacy with 32% and 26% of patients achieving SALT ≤ 20 and SALT ≤ 10, compared to 12% and 9% in both other groups. Baricitinib demonstrated better secondary outcomes (50% and 90% reduction from initial SALT scores). All treatments exhibited mild-to-moderate and expected side effects. Weight gain, which had not been reported in clinical trials for alopecia areata, was observed in three baricitinib-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib was superior to traditional treatments for severe alopecia areata after 6 months. Weight gain concerned 16% of patients receiving baricitinib.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a alopecia areata $x farmakoterapie $7 D000506
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a puriny $x škodlivé účinky $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D011687
650    12
$a azetidiny $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D001384
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a sulfonamidy $x škodlivé účinky $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D013449
650    12
$a pyrazoly $x škodlivé účinky $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D011720
650    12
$a inhibitory Janus kinas $x škodlivé účinky $x aplikace a dávkování $x terapeutické užití $7 D000075242
650    12
$a imunosupresiva $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007166
650    12
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a imunologické faktory $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D007155
650    _2
$a hormony kůry nadledvin $x terapeutické užití $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000305
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Dolezal, Tomas $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gkalpakiotis, Spyridon $u Department of Dermatovenerology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Arenberger, Petr $u Department of Dermatovenerology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00007681 $t Journal of cosmetic dermatology $x 1473-2165 $g Roč. 24, č. 2 (2025), s. e16666
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39564906 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429134936 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311455 $s 1247178
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 24 $c 2 $d e16666 $e 20241120 $i 1473-2165 $m Journal of cosmetic dermatology $n J Cosmet Dermatol $x MED00007681
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...