Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed
10781354
DOI
10.1053/euhj.1999.1993
PII: S0195668X99919930
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary * MeSH
- Myocardial Infarction therapy MeSH
- Hospitals, Community MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Patient Transfer * MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Feasibility Studies MeSH
- Thrombolytic Therapy * MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
BACKGROUND: Primary coronary angioplasty is an effective reperfusion strategy in acute myocardial infarction. However, its availability is limited, and transporting patients to an angioplasty centre in the acute phase of myocardial infarction has not yet been proved safe. METHODS: The PRAGUE study (PRimary Angioplasty in patients transferred from General community hospitals to specialized PTCA Units with or without Emergency thrombolysis) compared three reperfusion strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction, presenting within 6 h of symptom onset at community hospitals without a catheterization laboratory: group A - thrombolytic therapy in community hospitals (n=99), group B - thrombolytic therapy during transportation to angioplasty (n=100), group C - immediate transportation for primary angioplasty without pre-treatment with thrombolysis (n=101). RESULTS: No complications occurred during transportation in group C. Two ventricular fibrillations occurred during transportation in group B. Median admission-reperfusion time in transported patients (group B 106 min, group C 96 min) compared favourably with the anticipated >90 min in group A. The combined primary end-point (death/reinfarction/stroke at 30 days) was less frequent in group C (8%) compared to groups B (15%) and A (23%, P<0. 02). The incidence of reinfarction was markedly reduced by transport to primary angioplasty (1% in group C vs 7% in group B vs 10% in group A, P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Transferring patients from community hospitals to a tertiary angioplasty centre in the acute phase of myocardial infarction is feasible and safe. This strategy is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of reinfarction and the combined clinical end-point of death/reinfarction/stroke at 30 days when compared to standard thrombolytic therapy at the community hospital.
References provided by Crossref.org
Risk Stratification of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Myocardial ischemic injury and protection
