Degradation of the Photosystem II D1 and D2 proteins in different strains of the cyanobacterium Synechocytis PCC 6803 varying with respect to the type and level of psbA transcript

. 2000 Mar ; 42 (4) : 635-45.

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid10809009

The turnover of the D1 and D2 proteins of Photosystem II (PSII) has been investigated by pulse-chase radiolabeling in several strains of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803 containing different types and levels of the psbA transcript. Strains lacking psbA1 and psbA3 gene and containing high levels of the psbA2 transcript showed the selective synthesis of D1 whose degradation could be slowed down by the protein synthesis inhibitor lincomycin. In contrast, in strains containing just the psbA3 gene, the intensity of the D1 protein labeling was lower and labeling of the D2 and CP43 proteins was stimulated in comparison to the psbA2-containing strains. In addition, the rate and selectivity of the D1 degradation and its dependence on the presence of lincomycin was proportional to the level of the psbA3 transcript in the particular strain. Consequently, there was parallel, lincomycin-independent and slowed-down breakdown of the D1 and D2 proteins in strains with the lowest level of psbA3 transcript. These results are discussed in terms of a model in which the rate of D1 and D2 degradation in cyanobacteria is affected not only by the rate of PSII photodamage, but also by the availability of newly synthesized D1 protein. Moreover, the comparison of the non-oxygen-evolving D1 mutants D170A** and Y161F*** differing by the presence of tyrosine Z has indicated a minor role of the oxidized form of this secondary PSII electron donor in the donor side mechanism of D1 and D2 protein breakdown.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 PubMed

EMBO J. 1988 Feb;7(2):325-32 PubMed

Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Apr;238(1-2):161-8 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(1):109-12 PubMed

Plant Mol Biol. 1989 Dec;13(6):693-700 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1998 Nov 17;37(46):16262-9 PubMed

Eur J Biochem. 1995 Oct 15;233(2):677-82 PubMed

Cell. 1989 Jan 27;56(2):241-6 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1995 Jun 23;270(25):14919-27 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1992 Nov 10;31(44):10859-71 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1988 Dec 27;27(26):9071-4 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1998 Jul 10;273(28):17439-44 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Jul 5;1143(2):113-34 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 16;33(32):9722-30 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 5;268(28):21246-52 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Mar;81(5):1380-4 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1995 Aug 8;34(31):10019-26 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1989 Aug 22;28(17):6960-9 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1994 May 24;33(20):6150-7 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1579-84 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 15;89(4):1408-12 PubMed

Eur J Biochem. 1997 Sep 15;248(3):731-40 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1995 Jul 25;34(29):9625-31 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1992 Jan 28;31(3):942-8 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1991 Jul 30;30(30):7586-97 PubMed

Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Apr;33(6):1059-71 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1995 Feb 21;34(7):2317-32 PubMed

Photosynth Res. 1996 Feb;47(2):111-20 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1994 May 24;33(20):6137-49 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...