The detection of the non-M2 muscarinic receptor subtype in the rat heart atria and ventricles
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- exprese genu MeSH
- fosfolipasy typu C metabolismus MeSH
- kompetitivní vazba MeSH
- krysa rodu Rattus MeSH
- potkani Wistar MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M1 účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M2 účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M3 účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M5 účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- receptory muskarinové účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- srdeční komory účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- srdeční síně účinky léků metabolismus MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- krysa rodu Rattus MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- fosfolipasy typu C MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M1 MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M2 MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M3 MeSH
- receptor muskarinový M5 MeSH
- receptory muskarinové MeSH
Mammal heart tissue has long been assumed to be the exclusive domain of the M(2) subtype of muscarinic receptor, but data supporting the presence of other subtypes also exist. We have tested the hypothesis that muscarinic receptors other than the M(2) subtype are present in the heart as minor populations. We used several approaches: a set of competition binding experiments with pirenzepine, AFDX-116, 4-DAMP, PD 102807, p-F-HHSiD, AQ-RA 741, DAU 5884, methoctramine and tripinamide, blockage of M(1) muscarinic receptors using MT7 toxin, subtype-specific immunoprecipitation experiments and determination of phospholipase C activity. We also attempted to block M(1)-M(4) receptors using co-treatment with MT7 and AQ-RA 741. Our results show that only the M(2) subtype is present in the atria. In the ventricles, however, we were able to determine that 20% (on average) of the muscarinic receptors were subtypes other than M(2), with the majority of these belonging to the M(1) subtype. We were also able to detect a marginal fraction (6 +/- 2%) of receptors that, based on other findings, belong mainly to the M(5) muscarinic receptors. Co-treatment with MT7 and AQ-RA 741 was not a suitable tool for blocking of M(1)-M(4) receptors and can not therefore be used as a method for M(5) muscarinic receptor detection in substitution to crude venom. These results provide further evidence of the expression of the M(1) muscarinic receptor subtype in the rat heart and also show that the heart contains at least one other, albeit minor, muscarinic receptor population, which most likely belongs to the M(5) muscarinic receptors but not to that of the M(3) receptors.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2003 Oct;368(4):316-9 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1991 Nov;40(5):783-9 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Mar 11;968(3):340-5 PubMed
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000 Jan 20;57(1):175-80 PubMed
Circ Res. 1996 Jul;79(1):86-93 PubMed
Pharmacol Res. 2001 Sep;44(3):161-82 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1991 Jul;40(1):28-35 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;43(2):149-57 PubMed
Eur J Pharmacol. 1993 Dec 7;250(2):223-30 PubMed
Eur J Pharmacol. 1994 Mar 3;253(3):275-81 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 2001 Feb 23;276(8):5650-8 PubMed
Pharmacol Rev. 1998 Jun;50(2):279-90 PubMed
Pediatr Res. 1992 Jun;31(6):601-5 PubMed
Toxicon. 2000 Feb;38(2):187-98 PubMed
Auton Autacoid Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;27(1):1-11 PubMed
Neuroscience. 1993 Oct;56(4):1041-8 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1991 Dec;40(6):900-7 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Oct;131(3):447-52 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Jan;138(1):156-60 PubMed
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1993 Jul-Sep;4(3):229-48 PubMed
Biochem Pharmacol. 1997 Apr 4;53(7):959-67 PubMed
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2003 Nov;368(5):366-76 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Oct 15;1055(1):43-53 PubMed
J Neurosci. 1991 Oct;11(10):3218-26 PubMed
Circulation. 2001 Mar 27;103(12):1638-43 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;142(3):395-408 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 1995 Aug;115(8):1525-31 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1983 Nov;24(3):351-6 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 2000 May;130(1):13-21 PubMed
FASEB J. 2004 Apr;18(6):711-3 PubMed
Eur J Pharmacol. 1992 Feb 13;225(2):105-12 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1692-7 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 2001 May;59(5):1029-36 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 1999 Aug;127(7):1551-8 PubMed
J Neurochem. 1999 Aug;73(2):780-90 PubMed
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1018:315-22 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 2002 Jun;61(6):1267-72 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1991 May;39(5):643-9 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1998 Mar;53(3):573-89 PubMed
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996 Apr;27(4):455-61 PubMed
Basic Res Cardiol. 2001 Nov;96(6):528-38 PubMed
Life Sci. 2006 Jun 6;79(2):112-20 PubMed
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Apr;301(1):129-37 PubMed
J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:41-60 PubMed
Am J Physiol. 1993 Sep;265(3 Pt 1):C666-73 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 2005 Aug;145(8):1153-9 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1999 Mar;55(3):497-507 PubMed
Life Sci. 1997;60(13-14):1105-12 PubMed
J Lipid Mediat Cell Signal. 1995 Jul;12(1):1-10 PubMed
Circ Res. 1994 Nov;75(5):813-20 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 27;273(48):32158-66 PubMed
FEBS Lett. 1990 Nov 26;275(1-2):65-9 PubMed
Pharmacol Res. 2006 Nov;54(5):345-55 PubMed
J Med Chem. 1998 Oct 8;41(21):4150-60 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1988 Sep;34(3):327-33 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;138(3):469-80 PubMed
Biochemistry. 1989 Aug 22;28(17):7130-7 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1993 Dec;44(6):1171-5 PubMed
Muscarinic Receptors in Cardioprotection and Vascular Tone Regulation
Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists