A standardization study of the Czech version of the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MASTcz) in stroke patients and control subjects
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Validation Study
PubMed
18787990
DOI
10.1080/02699050802372190
PII: 902418559
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Aphasia diagnosis rehabilitation MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Stroke complications MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Language Tests standards MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Recovery of Function physiology MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Speech Therapy MeSH
- Stroke Rehabilitation MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Evaluation Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To assess the criterion and construct validity and inter-rater reliability of the Czech version of the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MASTcz). RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of consecutive inpatients admitted to the stroke unit of a university hospital within 60 days of onset of a unilateral left hemispheric ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke with documented aphasia (LHA + ; n = 149). As control groups, unilateral right hemisphere stroke patients without aphasia (RHA-; n = 45) and healthy volunteers recruited from the community to comprise a non-patient control group (CG; n = 243) were examined. METHODS: Data collection included administration of MASTcz (in 52 LHA + patients, repeated by two blinded observers within 24 hours), Edinburgh inventory, Minimental State Examination score and chart review. The presence of aphasia was documented with a standard clinical logopaedic examination and also with the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) in 45 LHA+ patients. RESULTS: MASTcz displayed high criterion validity (with sensitivity and specificity above 90%) in discrimination between stroke aphasia patients and both control subjects and RHA- stroke patients, high construct validity (close correlation with WAB score; r = 0.933), and acceptable interrater reliability. CONCLUSION: Analyses suggest the usefulness of MASTcz as a reliable and valid screening tool for the detection of aphasia and tracking of its progress.
References provided by Crossref.org