Variability in the use of CE-marked assays for in vitro diagnostics of CFTR gene mutations in European genetic testing laboratories
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
19050730
PubMed Central
PMC2986222
DOI
10.1038/ejhg.2008.209
PII: ejhg2008209
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cystic Fibrosis diagnosis genetics MeSH
- Electrophoresis, Capillary standards MeSH
- Genetic Testing methods standards MeSH
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques standards MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mutation * MeSH
- Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator genetics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- CFTR protein, human MeSH Browser
- Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator MeSH
DNA diagnostics of genetic diseases increasingly shifts towards utilization of commercial assays. Cystic fibrosis (CF)-related DNA diagnostics were used as a model for a pilot survey of the variability in the utilization of qualitative CE-marked in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays and the scale of their modification by end users. A structured questionnaire, developed in the context of the EuroGentest project, was distributed within the frame of the 2005 annual CF external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. Its aim was to evaluate the variability in the use of different CE-marked IVD assays in routine CF DNA diagnostics. Survey results were analysed and sequentially discussed with respective users and/or manufacturers. In total, 125 responses from EQA scheme participants were received. Almost half of the respondents modified manufacturer-recommended protocols. They also reported sporadic and/or recurrent problems with assay performance and genotyping of particular alleles. Nonetheless, only half of the respondents performed in-house verification before the implementation of the assay in clinical diagnostics and/or after modification of the recommended protocol. Results of this survey substantiate the importance of guidelines for proper verification of CE-marked IVD assays in DNA diagnostics, using CF as a model.
See more in PubMed
Dequeker E, Cuppens H, Dodge H, et al. Recommendations for quality improvement in genetic testing for cystic fibrosis. European Concerted Action on Cystic Fibrosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000. pp. S2–S24. PubMed
Dequeker E, Cassiman JJ. Genetic testing and quality control in diagnostic laboratories. Nat Genet. 2000;25:259–260. PubMed
Girodon-Boulandet E, Cazeneuve C, Goossens M. Screening Practices for Mutations in the CFTR Gene ABCC7. Hum Mutat. 2000;15:135–149. PubMed
Cassiman JJ. Research network: EuroGentest – a European Network of Excellence aimed at harmonizing genetic testing services. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:1103–1105. PubMed
Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union 1998, , http://www.ivd-ce.com/ivd.pdf (Accessed October 2007).
Dequeker E, Ramsden S, Grody WW, Stenyel TT, Barton DE. Quality control in molecular genetic testing. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:717–723. PubMed
Prence E. A practical guide for the validation of genetic tests. Genet Test. 1999;3:201–205. PubMed
Ramsden SC, Deans Z, Robinson DO, et al. Monitoring standards for molecular genetic testing in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Ireland. Genet Test. 2006;10:147–156. PubMed
OECD Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Molecular Genetic Testing, OECD 2007 , http://www.cfnetwork.be/doc/QAGuidelineseng.pdf (Accessed May 2007).
The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective