Early experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
19250085
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02277.x
PII: PACE2277
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Catheter Ablation methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Body Surface Potential Mapping methods MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Robotics methods MeSH
- Pulmonary Veins surgery MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Controlled Clinical Trial MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary venous antra isolation (PVAI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation procedure for drug refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the procedure is technically challenging. Robotic navigation has a potential to expedite and facilitate the procedure. METHODS: A robotic catheter control system was used for remote navigation-supported PVAI in 22 patients (mean age = 55 +/- 9 years, 16 males, study group). An irrigated-tip catheter with estimate of catheter force on the tissue was used. This was compared in nonrandomized fashion with conventional hand-controlled catheter ablation in 16 patients (mean age = 55 +/- 9 years, 13 males, control group). The procedures were performed under guidance of Ensite NavX navigation system (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) and intracardiac echocardiography. RESULTS: Robotic navigation was associated with significantly shorter overall duration of radiofrequency delivery (1,641 +/- 609 vs 2,188 +/- 865 seconds, P < 0.01), shorter total procedural time (207 +/- 29 vs 250 +/- 62 minutes, P = 0.007), fluoroscopy exposure (15 +/- 5 vs 27 +/- 9 minutes, P < 0.001), and lower radiation dose (1,119 +/- 596 vs 3,048 +/- 2,029 mGy/m(2), P < 0.001). No complication was observed in either the study or the control group. During the 5 +/- 1 months follow-up in the study group and 9 +/- 3 months in the control group, 91% and 81% of patients, respectively, were AF free. CONCLUSIONS: In our early clinical experience, PVAI using a remote robotic catheter navigation was effective, safe, and associated with shorter procedural and fluoroscopic times than conventional PVAI.
References provided by Crossref.org
Reduction of Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Dosage During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Contact Force Assessment In Catheter Ablation Of Atrial Fibrillation