Impact of two different types of heat stress on chloroplast movement and fluorescence signal of tobacco leaves

. 2010 Jul ; 29 (7) : 705-14. [epub] 20100430

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid20431889

Although the chloroplast movement can be strongly affected by ambient temperature, the information about chloroplast movement especially related to high temperatures is scarce. For detailed investigation of the effects of heat stress (HS) on tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Samsun), we used two different HS treatments in dark with wide range of elevated temperatures (25-45 degrees C). The leaf segments were either linearly heated in water bath at heating rate of 2 degrees C min(-1) from room temperature up to maximal temperature (T (m)) and then linearly cooled down to 25 degrees C or incubated for 5 min in water bath at the same T (m) followed by 5 min incubation at 25 degrees C (T-jump). The changes in light-induced chloroplast movement caused by the HS pretreatment were detected after the particular heating regime at 25 degrees C using a method of time-dependent collimated transmittance (CT) and compared with the chlorophyll O-J-I-P fluorescence rise (FLR) measurements. The inhibition of chloroplast movement started at about 40 degrees C while the fluorescence parameters responded generally at higher T (m). This difference in sensitivity of CT and FLR was higher for the T-jump than for the linear HS indicating importance of applied heating regime. A possible influence of chloroplast movement on the FLR measurement and a physiological role of the HS-impaired chloroplast movement are discussed.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Plant Physiol. 2005 Feb;162(2):181-94 PubMed

Plant Cell Physiol. 2002 Apr;43(4):367-71 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13106-11 PubMed

Protoplasma. 2007;230(3-4):231-42 PubMed

J Exp Biol. 2003 Jun;206(Pt 12):1963-9 PubMed

Eur Biophys J. 1999;28(6):468-77 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 5;98(12):6969-74 PubMed

Science. 2001 Mar 16;291(5511):2138-41 PubMed

J Cell Sci. 2001 Jan;114(Pt 2):269-79 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2001 Jan;125(1):119-22 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2008 Oct;148(2):829-42 PubMed

Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:455-68 PubMed

J Plant Res. 2003 Feb;116(1):1-5 PubMed

Photosynth Res. 2004;81(1):49-66 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2002 Aug;129(4):1773-80 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1996 Jul;111(3):867-875 PubMed

J Exp Bot. 2006;57(9):2121-32 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Apr;1767(4):295-305 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2009 Mar;149(3):1568-78 PubMed

Photosynth Res. 2000;65(1):41-52 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 May 26;1412(1):1-28 PubMed

J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 Oct;50(10):1292-9 PubMed

Nature. 2002 Dec 19-26;420(6917):829-32 PubMed

Planta. 1987 Apr;170(4):489-504 PubMed

Photosynth Res. 2002;72(3):271-84 PubMed

Photosynth Res. 1992 Apr;32(1):23-35 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1999 Sep;121(1):37-44 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1986 May;81(1):259-67 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace