• This record comes from PubMed

Survey of cyanobacterial toxins in Czech water reservoirs--the first observation of neurotoxic saxitoxins

. 2014 ; 21 (13) : 8006-15. [epub] 20140323

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The environmental occurrence and concentrations of cyanobacterial toxins (cyanotoxins) were investigated in the Czech Republic. Concentrations of microcystins (MCs), cylindrospermopsin (CYN) or saxitoxins (STXs) were determined immunochemically by ELISA assays in 30 water samples collected from the surface layers of 19 reservoirs during the summer season of 2010. MCs were detected in 18 reservoirs and 83 % of samples, with median and maximal concentration being 1.5 and 18.6 μg/L, respectively. The high frequency of MC occurrence coincided with prevalence of cyanobacterium Microcystis sp., which was detected in 87 % samples, followed by Dolichospermum (Anabaena) sp. observed in 33 % samples. CYN was detected by ELISA only in one sample at a concentration of 1.2 μg/L. STXs presence was indicated for the first time in Czech water reservoirs when the toxins were found at low concentrations (0.03-0.04 μg/L) in two samples (7 %) collected from two different reservoirs, where STXs co-occurred with MCs and eventually also with CYN. In both STX-positive samples, the phytoplankton community was dominated by Microcystis sp., but Dolichospermum sp. and/or Aphanizomenon sp. were also present as putative producers of STX and/or CYN. Cyanotoxins commonly occurred in Czech water reservoirs, and MCs frequently at concentrations possibly associated with human health risks. MCs were the most prevalent and abundant cyanotoxins, but also other cyanotoxins were detected, though sporadically. Further research and regulatory monitoring of cyanotoxins other than MCs is therefore required.

See more in PubMed

J AOAC Int. 2001 Jul-Aug;84(4):1035-44 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Feb;76(4):1173-80 PubMed

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 Jul;397(5):1705-14 PubMed

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004 Sep;27(5):592-602 PubMed

Toxicon. 2011 May;57(6):918-21 PubMed

Environ Toxicol. 2006 Jun;21(3):236-43 PubMed

Mar Drugs. 2013 Jul 22;11(7):2643-54 PubMed

Analyst. 2001 Nov;126(11):2002-7 PubMed

Toxicon. 2000 Dec;38(12):1689-702 PubMed

Toxicon. 2009 Apr;53(5):519-24 PubMed

Mar Drugs. 2010 Jul 20;8(7):2185-211 PubMed

Toxicon. 2001 Jun;39(6):757-61 PubMed

J Chromatogr A. 2003 Dec 5;1020(1):105-19 PubMed

Toxicon. 2007 Nov;50(6):800-9 PubMed

Environ Toxicol. 2003 Apr;18(2):94-103 PubMed

Environ Toxicol. 2007 Feb;22(1):26-32 PubMed

Environ Toxicol. 2009 Aug;24(4):415-20 PubMed

Environ Toxicol. 2003 Apr;18(2):78-93 PubMed

Toxicon. 2003 Sep;42(3):313-21 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;34(3):651-60 PubMed

Environ Toxicol. 2005 Jun;20(3):331-40 PubMed

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38(2):97-125 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2000 Sep;89(3):532-8 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013 Jan;37(1):23-43 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2003 Jun;55(2):243-50 PubMed

Microbiology (Reading). 2004 Jun;150(Pt 6):1785-1796 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2009 Feb;74(5):669-75 PubMed

Mar Drugs. 2010 May 10;8(5):1650-80 PubMed

Toxicon. 2006 Feb;47(2):156-62 PubMed

Toxicon. 2008 Nov;52(6):677-86 PubMed

Environ Microbiol. 2013 May;15(5):1239-53 PubMed

Environ Toxicol. 2003 Jun;18(3):176-86 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Aug;76(15):4943-9 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...