Effects of soil organic matter properties and microbial community composition on enzyme activities in cryoturbated arctic soils
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
I 370
Austrian Science Fund FWF - Austria
PubMed
24705618
PubMed Central
PMC3976392
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0094076
PII: PONE-D-13-51541
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aktivace enzymů MeSH
- dusík metabolismus MeSH
- enzymy metabolismus MeSH
- hydrolýza MeSH
- mikrobiota * MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie * MeSH
- uhlík metabolismus MeSH
- zeměpis MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Arktida MeSH
- Sibiř MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dusík MeSH
- enzymy MeSH
- půda MeSH
- uhlík MeSH
Enzyme-mediated decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM) is controlled, amongst other factors, by organic matter properties and by the microbial decomposer community present. Since microbial community composition and SOM properties are often interrelated and both change with soil depth, the drivers of enzymatic decomposition are hard to dissect. We investigated soils from three regions in the Siberian Arctic, where carbon rich topsoil material has been incorporated into the subsoil (cryoturbation). We took advantage of this subduction to test if SOM properties shape microbial community composition, and to identify controls of both on enzyme activities. We found that microbial community composition (estimated by phospholipid fatty acid analysis), was similar in cryoturbated material and in surrounding subsoil, although carbon and nitrogen contents were similar in cryoturbated material and topsoils. This suggests that the microbial community in cryoturbated material was not well adapted to SOM properties. We also measured three potential enzyme activities (cellobiohydrolase, leucine-amino-peptidase and phenoloxidase) and used structural equation models (SEMs) to identify direct and indirect drivers of the three enzyme activities. The models included microbial community composition, carbon and nitrogen contents, clay content, water content, and pH. Models for regular horizons, excluding cryoturbated material, showed that all enzyme activities were mainly controlled by carbon or nitrogen. Microbial community composition had no effect. In contrast, models for cryoturbated material showed that enzyme activities were also related to microbial community composition. The additional control of microbial community composition could have restrained enzyme activities and furthermore decomposition in general. The functional decoupling of SOM properties and microbial community composition might thus be one of the reasons for low decomposition rates and the persistence of 400 Gt carbon stored in cryoturbated material.
Central Siberian Botanical Garden Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences Novosibirsk Russia
Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Bodenkunde Hannover Germany
University of South Bohemia Department of Ecosystems Biology České Budějovice Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462: 795–798 10.1038/nature08632 PubMed DOI
Sistla SA, Schimel JP (2012) Stoichiometric flexibility as a regulator of carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems under change. New Phytologist 196: 68–78 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04234.x PubMed DOI
Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, et al. (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology Letters 11: 1252–1264 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x PubMed DOI
DeForest JL, Smemo KA, Burke DJ, Elliott HL, Becker JC (2012) Soil microbial responses to elevated phosphorus and pH in acidic temperate deciduous forests. Biogeochemistry 109: 189–202.
Strickland MS, Lauber C, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2009) Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition. Ecology 90: 441–451 10.1890/08-0296.1 PubMed DOI
Kaiser C, Koranda M, Kitzler B, Fuchslueger L, Schnecker J, et al. (2010) Belowground carbon allocation by trees drives seasonal patterns of extracellular enzyme activities by altering microbial community composition in a beech forest soil. New Phytologist 187: 843–858 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03321.x PubMed DOI PMC
Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Fierer N (2012) Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: The strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 50: 58–65 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.011 DOI
Waldrop MP, Firestone MK (2006) Response of microbial community composition and function to soil climate change. Microbial Ecology 52: 716–724. PubMed
Talbot JM, Bruns TD, Smith DP, Branco S, Glassman SI, et al. (2013) Independent roles of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic communities in soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 57: 282–291 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.004 DOI
Rumpel C, Kögel-Knabner I (2011) Deep soil organic matter–a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant and Soil 338: 143–158.
Blume E, Bischoff M, Reichert J, Moorman T, Konopka A, et al. (2002) Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Applied Soil Ecology 20: 171–181.
Fierer N, Allen AS, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2003) Controls on microbial CO2 production: a comparison of surface and subsurface soil horizons. Global Change Biology 9: 1322–1332.
Santruckova H, Kastovska E, Kozlov D, Kurbatova J, Liveckova M, et al. (2010) Vertical and horizontal variation of carbon pools and fluxes in soil profile of wet southern taiga in European Russia. Boreal Environment Research 15: 357–369.
Ekelund F, Rønn R, Christensen S (2001) Distribution with depth of protozoa, bacteria and fungi in soil profiles from three Danish forest sites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33: 475–481.
Hartmann M, Lee S, Hallam SJ, Mohn WW (2009) Bacterial, archaeal and eukaryal community structures throughout soil horizons of harvested and naturally disturbed forest stands. Environmental Microbiology 11: 3045–3062 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02008.x PubMed DOI
Strickland MS, Osburn E, Lauber C, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2009) Litter quality is in the eye of the beholder: initial decomposition rates as a function of inoculum characteristics. Functional Ecology 23: 627–636 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01515.x DOI
Alster CJ, German DP, Lu Y, Allison SD (2013) Microbial enzymatic responses to drought and to nitrogen addition in a southern California grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 64: 68–79 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.034 DOI
Bockheim JG (2007) Importance of Cryoturbation in Redistributing Organic Carbon in Permafrost-Affected Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71: 1335–1342 10.2136/sssaj2006.0414N DOI
Kaiser C, Meyer H, Biasi C, Rusalimova O, Barsukov P, et al. (2007) Conservation of soil organic matter through cryoturbation in arctic soils in Siberia. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: G02017 10.1029/2006JG000258 DOI
Kuhry P, Dorrepaal E, Hugelius G, Schuur EAG, Tarnocai C (2010) Potential remobilization of belowground permafrost carbon under future global warming. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 21: 208–214 10.1002/ppp.684 DOI
Xu C, Guo L, Ping C, White DM (2009) Chemical and isotopic characterization of size-fractionated organic matter from cryoturbated tundra soils, northern Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research 114: G03002 10.1029/2008JG000846 DOI
Harden JW, Koven CD, Ping C, Hugelius G, McGuire AD, et al. (2012) Field information links permafrost carbon to physical vulnerabilities of thawing. Geophysical Research Letters 39: L15704.
Gebauer RLE, Tenhunen JD, Reynolds JF (1996) Soil aeration in relation to soil physical properties, nitrogen availability, and root characteristics within an arctic watershed. Plant and Soil 178: 37–48.
Oelke C, Zhang T (2004) A model study of circum-Arctic soil temperatures. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 15: 103–121.
Gittel A, Bárta J, Kohoutová I, Mikutta R, Owens S, et al... (2014) Distinct microbial communities associated with buried soils in the Siberian tundra. The ISME Journal: in press. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.219 PubMed PMC
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965–1978 10.1002/joc.1276 DOI
Kaiser C, Frank A, Wild B, Koranda M, Richter A (2010) Negligible contribution from roots to soil-borne phospholipid fatty acid fungal biomarkers 18:2ω6,9 and 18:1ω9. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42: 1650–1652 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.019 PubMed DOI PMC
IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome.
Harris D, Horwáth WR, van Kessel C (2001) Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or CARBON-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65: 1853–1856 10.2136/sssaj2001.1853 DOI
Schnecker J, Wild B, Fuchslueger L, Richter A (2012) A field method to store samples from temperate mountain grassland soils for analysis of phospholipid fatty acids. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 51: 81–83 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.029 PubMed DOI PMC
Frostegård Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E (1991) Microbial biomass measured as total lipid phosphate in soils of different organic content. Journal of Microbiological Methods 14: 151–163.
Colman BP, Schimel JP (2013) Drivers of microbial respiration and net N mineralization at the continental scale. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 60: 65–76 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.003 DOI
Grace JB (2006) Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systmes. New York, Cambridge University Press
R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org.
Sinsabaugh RL, Follstad Shah JJ (2011) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of recalcitrant organic matter decomposition: the growth rate hypothesis in reverse. Biogeochemistry 102: 31–43.
Hugelius G, Kuhry P, Tarnocai C, Virtanen T (2010) Soil organic carbon pools in a periglacial landscape: a case study from the central Canadian Arctic. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 21: 16–29 10.1002/ppp.677 DOI
Djukic I, Zehetner F, Watzinger A, Horacek M, Gerzabek MH (2013) In situ carbon turnover dynamics and the role of soil microorganisms therein: a climate warming study in an Alpine ecosystem. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 83: 112–124 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01449.x PubMed DOI
Prosser J (2012) Ecosystem processes and interactions in a morass of diversity. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 81: 507–519 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01435.x PubMed DOI
Schimel JP, Schaeffer SM (2012) Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 3: 1–11 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348 PubMed DOI PMC
Allison SD, Lu Y, Weihe C, Goulden ML, Martiny AC, et al. (2013) Microbial abundance and composition influence litter decomposition response to environmental change. Ecology 94: 714–725 10.1890/12-1243.1 PubMed DOI
Sinsabaugh RL (2010) Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42: 391–404 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.014 DOI
Wild B, Schnecker J, Bárta J, Čapek P, Guggenberger G, et al. (2013) Nitrogen dynamics in Turbic Cryosols from Siberia and Greenland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 67: 85–93 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.004 PubMed DOI PMC