The dynamics of protein and nucleic acid structures is as important as their average static picture. The local molecular dynamics concealed in diffraction images is expressed as so-called B factors. To find out how the crystal-derived B factors represent the dynamic behaviour of atoms and residues of proteins and DNA in their complexes, the distributions of scaled B factors from a carefully curated data set of over 700 protein-DNA crystal structures were analyzed [Schneider et al. (2014), Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 3381-3394]. Amino acids and nucleotides were categorized based on their molecular neighbourhood as solvent-accessible, solvent-inaccessible (i.e. forming the protein core) or lying at protein-protein or protein-DNA interfaces; the backbone and side-chain atoms were analyzed separately. The B factors of two types of crystal-ordered water molecules were also analyzed. The analysis confirmed several expected features of protein and DNA dynamics, but also revealed surprising facts. Solvent-accessible amino acids have B factors that are larger than those of residues at the biomolecular interfaces, and core-forming amino acids are the most restricted in their movement. A unique feature of the latter group is that their side-chain and backbone atoms are restricted in their movement to the same extent; in all other amino-acid groups the side chains are more floppy than the backbone. The low values of the B factors of water molecules bridging proteins with DNA and the very large fluctuations of DNA phosphates are surprising. The features discriminating different types of residues are less pronounced in structures with lower crystallographic resolution. Some of the observed trends are likely to be the consequence of improper refinement protocols that may need to be rectified.

INSERM U1134 DSIMB 75739 Paris France

Institute of Biotechnology AS CR Videnska 1083 142 20 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Berman, H. M., Battistuz, T. et al. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 899–907. PubMed

Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Iype, L., Schneider, B. & Zardecki, C. (2002). Acta Cryst. D58, 889–898. PubMed

Chothia, C. (1975). Nature (London), 254, 304–308. PubMed

Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763. PubMed

Halle, B. (2002). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 1274–1279. PubMed

Howlin, B., Butler, S. A., Moss, D. S., Harris, G. W. & Driessen, H. P. C. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 622–624.

Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. (1996). J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38. PubMed

Merritt, E. A. (2012). Acta Cryst. D68, 468–477. PubMed PMC

Richards, F. M. (1974). J. Mol. Biol. 82, 1–14. PubMed

Rupp, B. (2009). Biomolecular Crystallography: Principles, Practice, and Application to Structural Biology. New York: Garland Science.

Schneider, B., Cerny, J., Svozil, D., Cech, P., Gelly, J.-C. & de Brevern, A. G. (2014). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 3381–3394. PubMed PMC

Smith, D. K., Radivojac, P., Obradovic, Z., Dunker, A. K. & Zhu, G. (2003). Protein Sci. 12, 1060–1072. PubMed PMC

Tronrud, D. E. (1996). J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 100–104.

Trueblood, K. N., Bürgi, H.-B., Burzlaff, H., Dunitz, J. D., Gramaccioli, C. M., Schulz, H. H., Shmueli, U. & Abrahams, S. C. (1996). Acta Cryst. A52, 770–781.

Weiss, M. S. (2007). Acta Cryst. D63, 1235–1242. PubMed

Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242. PubMed

Knowledge-based prediction of DNA hydration using hydrated dinucleotides as building blocks

The crystal structure of XdpB, the bacterial old yellow enzyme, in an FMN-free form

A DNA Structural Alphabet Distinguishes Structural Features of DNA Bound to Regulatory Proteins and in the Nucleosome Core Particle

Structure of the ordered hydration of amino acids in proteins: analysis of crystal structures

Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets

Redesigning protein cavities as a strategy for increasing affinity in protein-protein interaction: interferon- γ receptor 1 as a model