Molecular diagnostics identifies risks for graft dysfunction despite borderline histologic changes
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem, validační studie
PubMed
26176825
DOI
10.1038/ki.2015.211
PII: S2157-1716(15)32267-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- asymptomatické nemoci MeSH
- biopsie MeSH
- časná diagnóza MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- diagnostické techniky molekulární * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci MeSH
- genetické markery * MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- ledviny patologie patofyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- regulace genové exprese MeSH
- rejekce štěpu genetika patologie patofyziologie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- sekvenční analýza hybridizací s uspořádaným souborem oligonukleotidů MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stanovení celkové genové exprese MeSH
- transplantace ledvin škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- genetické markery * MeSH
The significance of borderline changes in kidney allograft biopsies is widely debated. To help resolve this, we studied differences in intrarenal gene expression patterns between early clinical and 3-month protocol biopsies, all of which had borderline histologic changes. The gene expression profiles in training set of patients by microarray analysis and data were validated in a larger cohort using RT-qPCR. There was greater expression of immunity- and inflammation-related genes in the early clinical biopsies compared to the 3-month protocol biopsies with borderline changes. In early clinically manifested borderline changes, graft deterioration within 24 months due to chronic rejection was associated with increased activation of immune, defense, and inflammatory processes. Regression modeling identified higher donor age and expression of macrophage receptor CLEC5A as risk factors for progression. In the 3-month protocol biopsies with borderline changes, graft dysfunction was associated with increased expression of fibrinogen complex transcripts. The discrimination power of fibrinogen was confirmed by cross-validation on two independent cohorts. Thus, our study highlights variations in gene expression between clinical and subclinical borderline changes despite similar histological findings. The data also support a recommendation for frequent patient monitoring, especially in those with borderline changes who received grafts from older donors.
Biomedical Centre Faculty of Medicine in Plzen Charles University Prague Plzen Czech Republic
Department of Immunogenetics Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Nephrology Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Department of Nephrology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Thomayer's Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
Transplant Laboratory Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Transpl Int. 2009 Mar;22(3):293-302 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2014 Feb;14(2):272-83 PubMed
J Exp Med. 2010 Mar 15;207(3):579-89 PubMed
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;17(9):2622-32 PubMed
Kidney Int. 1997 Jan;51(1):310-6 PubMed
Nature. 2008 May 29;453(7195):672-6 PubMed
Kidney Int. 2011 Nov;80(10):1035-44 PubMed
Transplantation. 2010 Mar 15;89(5):537-47 PubMed
J Clin Invest. 1950 May;29(5):496-507 PubMed
Transplant Proc. 2008 Sep;40(7):2303-6 PubMed
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 May;23(5):948-58 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 10;349(2):125-38 PubMed
Transplantation. 2002 Jun 27;73(12):1965-8 PubMed
Transplant Proc. 1997 Feb-Mar;29(1-2):112 PubMed
J Leukoc Biol. 2009 Mar;85(3):508-17 PubMed
Eur J Immunol. 2003 Sep;33(9):2630-9 PubMed
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998 Mar 6;244(1):268-74 PubMed
Genomics. 1997 May 1;41(3):471-6 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2013 Mar;13(3):645-55 PubMed
Lancet. 1994 Jan 22;343(8891):209-11 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2012 Jan;12(1):11-2 PubMed
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013 Feb;17(1):75-9 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2012 Jan;12(1):38-42 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2004 Sep;4(9):1475-89 PubMed
Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Oct;28(4):585-8 PubMed
Transplantation. 2013 Jan 15;95(1):148-54 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2013 Sep;13(9):2334-41 PubMed
J Clin Invest. 2010 Jun;120(6):1862-72 PubMed
Transplant Proc. 2009 Apr;41(3):794-6 PubMed
Kidney Int. 2011 Dec;80(12):1364-76 PubMed
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Aug;10(8):1806-14 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4):753-60 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2005 May;5(5):1130-6 PubMed
Transplantation. 1994 Mar 27;57(6):871-6 PubMed
Transplantation. 1995 Feb 27;59(4):511-4 PubMed
Am J Transplant. 2012 Jan;12(1):191-201 PubMed
Exp Mol Pathol. 2007 Oct;83(2):188-97 PubMed
Molecular Assessment of Kidney Allografts: Are We Closer to a Daily Routine?
Molecular Fingerprints of Borderline Changes in Kidney Allografts Are Influenced by Donor Category
Early isolated V-lesion may not truly represent rejection of the kidney allograft